Sent from my iPad
> On 28 Apr 2018, at 00:15, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 27 April 2018 at 18:01, Jan Iversen <j...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>>> On 27 Apr 2018, at 16:30, Henk P. Penning <penn...@uu.nl> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, Jan Iversen wrote: >>>> >>>> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:04:50 +0200 >>>> From: Jan Iversen <j...@apache.org> >>>> To: general@attic.apache.org >>>> Subject: Re: new sites and swarm of commits. >>> >>> Hi Jan, >>> >>>>> --- >>>>> name: Oltu >>>>> project: oltu >>>>> retired: April 2018 >>>>> mailnames: >>>>> - dev >>>>> - user >>>>> - commits >>>>> tracker: >>>>> - JIRA >>>>> - OLTU >>>>> scm: svn >>>>> wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/oltu/ >>>>> description: |- >>>>> Apache Oltu was an OAuth protocol implementation in Java. It also >>>>> covers others OAuth family related implementations such as JWT, JWS >>>>> and OpenID Connect >>>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> What is complicated about that ? >>>> for one it is, yaml, and I still have not seen any online validator of >>>> that. json offers online validation so som faulty commits are avoided >>>> (not all I know). >>> >>> Why check ? If there's a yaml error the generator shows exactly >>> where the error occurs ; I think we can catch that. >>> If/when an error occurs, nothing should be committed, of course. >> >> because the generator runs after the yaml file is committed, not before. > > Of course, otherwise the buildbot has nothing to work on. > > But the generated code is only committed after the generator runs. > > Once a buildbot job has detected a failure it skips any remaining > steps, so it can be set to ignore the commit. > >>> >>>> secondly I believe having fields like JIRA and svn are wrong un very >>>> unflexible, having the url is a lot more generic. how will you retire >>>> e.g. AOO that runs its own bugzilla instance. >>> >>> I agree ; just an url is fine ; but 'as is' is easy too. >>> >>>> and I have to learn yaml. >>> >>> Copy/paste/edit of the example above should suffice almost always. >>> >>>>> Just ignore the commits. We'll judge the stuff when dev is done. >>>>> I think we're mostly done. >>> >>>> both of you keep saying that....I still believe that having a >>>> volunteer who will actually maintain it is now more important than >>>> seeing the final bits. >>> >>> Ok ; I'll volunteer to maintain the site. >>> I would love to see the stuff "at work". >> Super one less problem. The rest of the retiring process is nearly automated >> so that will not be a big extra job. > > I am happy to maintain the Jekyll site if that is chosen, or even the Perl > site. Super, so now we have 2 volunteers, seems I am off the hook. I will start a discussion/vote later. rgds jan i > >> rgds >> jan I >>> >>>> jan i >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> HPP >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------ _ >>> Henk P. Penning, ICT-beta R Uithof MG-403 _/ \_ >>> Faculty of Science, Utrecht University T +31 30 253 4106 / \_/ \ >>> Leuvenlaan 4, 3584CE Utrecht, NL F +31 30 253 4553 \_/ \_/ >>> http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~penni101/ M penn...@uu.nl \_/
