Sent from my iPad

> On 30 Apr 2018, at 20:43, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr> wrote:
> 
> I don't get what's the issue with creating a test Git repo, that is 
> independent from anything else, and that was discussed on the ML
There are no issue as such, it is just that lately we have seen a lot of things 
happening very uncoordinated. In this case it happened crossing another 
(slightly older, but with positive comments) to move the production to git. 

I would have preferred a more organized way, e.g. making sure a test site (or 
build bot) will have someone to maintain it, before just doing it. However this 
is just my opinion, which, even though I did the maintenance, seems to count 
very little.

Please lets stop this discussion, done is done, and I (as chair/pmc/committer) 
will have to accept the consequences.

rgds
jan I.

> 
> I did the exact same at GitHub just because it was outside Apache then was 
> even more clear that it was a side test to have  chance to get common tests 
> instead of long discussions where it's clear that a part of the discussion is 
> that we don't have the same initial culture on the technical parts
> 
> regards,
> 
> Hervé
> 
> Le lundi 30 avril 2018, 19:39:16 CEST Jan Iversen a écrit :
>> Hi
>> 
>> We just received an email that attic-test.git is created, on private, which
>> I cannot relay here due to apache policy (which I agree with).
>> 
>> I can however relay my response, what apart from a “thank you” was a call to
>> all:
>> 
>> “I must however state that the word “consensus” seems to mean nothing in our
>> little community. I remember we have discussed transferring the site to
>> git, something I would have done tomorrow based on the positive comments...
>> but attic-test, where did that come from.”
>> 
>> I am concerned about people going in different directions, without trying to
>> get consensus, what the community wants, that way we will never reach a
>> state where we can get a new site online.
>> 
>> PMC members know who made the request in self-service but not who initiated
>> it.
>> 
>> A concerned committer/PMC/Chair
>> jan I
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
> 
> 

Reply via email to