On 21/09/18 15:48 +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 12:21:31 +0100
From: Jonathan Wakely
Here's the corrected patch, any objections to this?
Quite the contrary; LGTM.
Committed to trunk.
> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 12:21:31 +0100
> From: Jonathan Wakely
> Here's the corrected patch, any objections to this?
Quite the contrary; LGTM.
brgds, H-P
On 21/09/18 11:39 +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 21/09/18 11:34, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/09/18 11:24 +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 21/09/18 01:52, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:22:23 +0100
From: Jonathan Wakely
On 20/09/18 15:36 +0200, Chri
On 21/09/18 11:34, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 21/09/18 11:24 +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>> On 21/09/18 01:52, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:22:23 +0100
From: Jonathan Wakely
>>>
On 20/09/18 15:36 +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2
On 21/09/18 11:24 +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 21/09/18 01:52, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:22:23 +0100
From: Jonathan Wakely
On 20/09/18 15:36 +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 23:13, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Christophe,
I have notic
On 21/09/18 02:52 +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:22:23 +0100
From: Jonathan Wakely
On 20/09/18 15:36 +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 23:13, Rainer Orth
wrote:
>>
>> Hi Christophe,
>>
>> > I have noticed failures on hypot-long-double.cc on ar
On 21/09/18 01:52, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:22:23 +0100
>> From: Jonathan Wakely
>
>> On 20/09/18 15:36 +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 23:13, Rainer Orth
>>> wrote:
Hi Christophe,
> I have noticed failures on hypot-long-
> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:22:23 +0100
> From: Jonathan Wakely
> On 20/09/18 15:36 +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> >On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 23:13, Rainer Orth
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Christophe,
> >>
> >> > I have noticed failures on hypot-long-double.cc on arm, so I suggest we
> >> > add:
> >>
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 16:22, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On 20/09/18 15:36 +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> >On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 23:13, Rainer Orth
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Christophe,
> >>
> >> > I have noticed failures on hypot-long-double.cc on arm, so I suggest we
> >> > add:
> >> >
> >> >
On 20/09/18 15:36 +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 23:13, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Christophe,
> I have noticed failures on hypot-long-double.cc on arm, so I suggest we add:
>
> diff --git
> a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/hypot-long-double.cc
> b/libstdc++
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 23:13, Rainer Orth wrote:
>
> Hi Christophe,
>
> > I have noticed failures on hypot-long-double.cc on arm, so I suggest we add:
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/hypot-long-double.cc
> > b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cma
Hi Christophe,
> I have noticed failures on hypot-long-double.cc on arm, so I suggest we add:
>
> diff --git
> a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/hypot-long-double.cc
> b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/hypot-long-double.cc
> index 8a05473..4c2e33b 100644
> --- a/l
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 at 16:54, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> Split the long double testing into a separate file, so that we can XFAIL
> targets where the long double precision doesn't meet the expected
> tolerances. The float and double tests are still expefted to PASS for
> all targets.
>
> PR
13 matches
Mail list logo
