On 20/09/18 15:36 +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 23:13, Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:

Hi Christophe,

> I have noticed failures on hypot-long-double.cc on arm, so I suggest we add:
>
> diff --git
> a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/hypot-long-double.cc
> b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/hypot-long-double.cc
> index 8a05473..4c2e33b 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/hypot-long-double.cc
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/hypot-long-double.cc
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
>
>  // { dg-options "-std=gnu++17" }
>  // { dg-do run { target c++17 } }
> -// { dg-xfail-run-if "PR 78179" { powerpc-ibm-aix* hppa-*-linux* nios2-*-* } 
}
> +// { dg-xfail-run-if "PR 78179" { powerpc-ibm-aix* hppa-*-linux*
> nios2-*-* arm*-*-* } }
>
>  // Run the long double tests from hypot.cc separately, because they fail on a
>  // number of targets. See PR libstdc++/78179 for details.
>
> OK?

just a nit (and not a review): I'd prefer the target list to be sorted
alphabetically, not completely random.


Sure, I can sort the whole list, if OK on principle.

Yes, please go ahead and commit it with the sorted list.

Reply via email to