On Tue, 12 Jan 2016, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> I think that following definition describes -msse -mfpmath=sse
> situation in the most elegant way. We can just declare that the
> precision is not known in this case:
>
> #define TARGET_FLT_EVAL_METHOD\
> (TARGET_MIX_SSE_I387 ?
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 01:32:05PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> Using this patch, SSE math won't be emitted for a simple testcase
>> using " -O2 -msse -m32 -std=c99 -mfpmath=sse" compile flags:
>>
>> float test (float a, float b)
>> {
>> re
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 01:32:05PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Using this patch, SSE math won't be emitted for a simple testcase
> using " -O2 -msse -m32 -std=c99 -mfpmath=sse" compile flags:
>
> float test (float a, float b)
> {
> return a + b;
> }
>
> since we start with:
>
> test (float a,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:10:20PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Joseph Myers
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Mon, 11 Jan 2016, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Here i
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:10:20PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Joseph Myers
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 11 Jan 2016, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> >
>> >> Here is the updated patch. Joseph, is this OK?
>> >
>> > I have no
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:10:20PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Jan 2016, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> >> Here is the updated patch. Joseph, is this OK?
> >
> > I have no objections to this patch.
>
> Thinking some more, it looks to me t
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2016, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
>> Here is the updated patch. Joseph, is this OK?
>
> I have no objections to this patch.
Thinking some more, it looks to me that we also have to return 2 when
SSE2 (SSE doubles) is not enabled.
I'm tes
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Here is the updated patch. Joseph, is this OK?
I have no objections to this patch.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:52 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> When FPU isn't used, there is no excess precision. We should set
>> FLT_EVAL_METHOD to 0 if 387 is disabled.
>>
>> OK for trunk?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> H.J.
>> ---
>> gcc/
>>
>> PR targe
