On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:52 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> When FPU isn't used, there is no excess precision.  We should set
>> FLT_EVAL_METHOD to 0 if 387 is disabled.
>>
>> OK for trunk?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> H.J.
>> ---
>> gcc/
>>
>>         PR target/69225
>>         * config/i386/i386.h (TARGET_FLT_EVAL_METHOD): Set to 0 if
>>         TARGET_80387 is false.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite
>>
>>         PR target/69225
>>         * gcc.target/i386/pr69225-1.c: New test.
>>         * gcc.target/i386/pr69225-2.c: Likewise.
>>         * gcc.target/i386/pr69225-3.c: Likewise.
>>         * gcc.target/i386/pr69225-4.c: Likewise.
>>         * gcc.target/i386/pr69225-5.c: Likewise.
>>         * gcc.target/i386/pr69225-6.c: Likewise.
>> ---
>>  gcc/config/i386/i386.h                    | 4 ++--
>>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-1.c | 8 ++++++++
>>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-2.c | 8 ++++++++
>>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-3.c | 8 ++++++++
>>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-4.c | 8 ++++++++
>>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-5.c | 8 ++++++++
>>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-6.c | 8 ++++++++
>>  7 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-1.c
>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-2.c
>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-3.c
>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-4.c
>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-5.c
>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-6.c
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
>> index dcaa011..5c97fd1 100644
>> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
>> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
>> @@ -692,9 +692,9 @@ extern const char *host_detect_local_cpu (int argc, 
>> const char **argv);
>>     FPU, assume that the fpcw is set to extended precision; when using
>>     only SSE, rounding is correct; when using both SSE and the FPU,
>>     the rounding precision is indeterminate, since either may be chosen
>> -   apparently at random.  */
>> +   apparently at random.  Also set to 0 if FPU isn't used.  */
>>  #define TARGET_FLT_EVAL_METHOD \
>> -  (TARGET_MIX_SSE_I387 ? -1 : TARGET_SSE_MATH ? 0 : 2)
>> +  (TARGET_MIX_SSE_I387 ? -1 : (TARGET_SSE_MATH || !TARGET_80387) ? 0 : 2)
>
> IMO, it is more informative written as:
>
>> +  (TARGET_MIX_SSE_I387 ? -1 : (TARGET_80387 && !TARGET_SSE_MATH) ? 2 : 0)
>
> So, you don't even need to adjust the comment.
>
> If Joseph (CC'd) is OK with the patch, then the patch is OK for mainline.
>

Here is the updated patch.  Joseph, is this OK?

Thanks.


-- 
H.J.
From f716c005109b9e78fae44b69935acd6434443cda Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.to...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 20:21:10 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Set FLT_EVAL_METHOD to 2 only if 387 FPU is used

When 387 FPU isn't used, there is no excess precision.  We should set
FLT_EVAL_METHOD to 2 only if 387 FPU is used.

gcc/

	PR target/69225
	* config/i386/i386.h (TARGET_FLT_EVAL_METHOD): Set to 2 only if
	TARGET_80387 is true.

gcc/testsuite

	PR target/69225
	* gcc.target/i386/pr69225-1.c: New test.
	* gcc.target/i386/pr69225-2.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.target/i386/pr69225-3.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.target/i386/pr69225-4.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.target/i386/pr69225-5.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.target/i386/pr69225-6.c: Likewise.
---
 gcc/config/i386/i386.h                    | 2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-1.c | 8 ++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-2.c | 8 ++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-3.c | 8 ++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-4.c | 8 ++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-5.c | 8 ++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-6.c | 8 ++++++++
 7 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-1.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-2.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-3.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-4.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-5.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-6.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
index dcaa011..6c63871 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
@@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ extern const char *host_detect_local_cpu (int argc, const char **argv);
    the rounding precision is indeterminate, since either may be chosen
    apparently at random.  */
 #define TARGET_FLT_EVAL_METHOD \
-  (TARGET_MIX_SSE_I387 ? -1 : TARGET_SSE_MATH ? 0 : 2)
+  (TARGET_MIX_SSE_I387 ? -1 : (TARGET_80387 && !TARGET_SSE_MATH) ? 2 : 0)
 
 /* Whether to allow x87 floating-point arithmetic on MODE (one of
    SFmode, DFmode and XFmode) in the current excess precision
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cc5b782
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+/* { dg-do compile} */
+/* { dg-options "-msse2 -mfpmath=sse" } */
+
+#include <float.h>
+
+#if FLT_EVAL_METHOD != 0
+# error FLT_EVAL_METHOD != 0
+#endif
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cd0a626
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+/* { dg-do compile} */
+/* { dg-options "-mno-sse -mno-80387" } */
+
+#include <float.h>
+
+#if FLT_EVAL_METHOD != 0
+# error FLT_EVAL_METHOD != 0
+#endif
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-3.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1440b74
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-3.c
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+/* { dg-do compile} */
+/* { dg-options "-m80387 -mfpmath=387" } */
+
+#include <float.h>
+
+#if FLT_EVAL_METHOD != 2
+# error FLT_EVAL_METHOD != 2
+#endif
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-4.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b032a5f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-4.c
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+/* { dg-do compile} */
+/* { dg-options "-msse2 -mfancy-math-387 -mfpmath=sse" } */
+
+#include <float.h>
+
+#if FLT_EVAL_METHOD != 0
+# error FLT_EVAL_METHOD != 0
+#endif
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-5.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-5.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4162f77
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-5.c
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+/* { dg-do compile} */
+/* { dg-options "-msse2 -m80387 -mfpmath=sse,387" } */
+
+#include <float.h>
+
+#if FLT_EVAL_METHOD != -1
+# error FLT_EVAL_METHOD != -1
+#endif
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-6.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-6.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cd5f419
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69225-6.c
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+/* { dg-do compile} */
+/* { dg-options "-mno-80387" } */
+
+#include <float.h>
+
+#if FLT_EVAL_METHOD != 0
+# error FLT_EVAL_METHOD != 0
+#endif
-- 
2.5.0

Reply via email to