On 21/09/18 15:48 +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 12:21:31 +0100
From: Jonathan Wakely
Here's the corrected patch, any objections to this?
Quite the contrary; LGTM.
Committed to trunk.
> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 12:21:31 +0100
> From: Jonathan Wakely
> Here's the corrected patch, any objections to this?
Quite the contrary; LGTM.
brgds, H-P
On 21/09/18 11:39 +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 21/09/18 11:34, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/09/18 11:24 +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 21/09/18 01:52, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:22:23 +0100
From: Jonathan Wakely
On 20/09/18 15:36 +0200, Chri
On 21/09/18 11:34, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 21/09/18 11:24 +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>> On 21/09/18 01:52, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:22:23 +0100
From: Jonathan Wakely
>>>
On 20/09/18 15:36 +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2
On 21/09/18 11:24 +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 21/09/18 01:52, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:22:23 +0100
From: Jonathan Wakely
On 20/09/18 15:36 +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 23:13, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Christophe,
I have notic
On 21/09/18 02:52 +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:22:23 +0100
From: Jonathan Wakely
On 20/09/18 15:36 +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 23:13, Rainer Orth
wrote:
>>
>> Hi Christophe,
>>
>> > I have noticed failures on hypot-long-double.cc on ar
On 21/09/18 01:52, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:22:23 +0100
>> From: Jonathan Wakely
>
>> On 20/09/18 15:36 +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 23:13, Rainer Orth
>>> wrote:
Hi Christophe,
> I have noticed failures on hypot-long-
> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:22:23 +0100
> From: Jonathan Wakely
> On 20/09/18 15:36 +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> >On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 23:13, Rainer Orth
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Christophe,
> >>
> >> > I have noticed failures on hypot-long-double.cc on arm, so I suggest we
> >> > add:
> >>
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 16:22, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On 20/09/18 15:36 +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> >On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 23:13, Rainer Orth
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Christophe,
> >>
> >> > I have noticed failures on hypot-long-double.cc on arm, so I suggest we
> >> > add:
> >> >
> >> >
On 20/09/18 15:36 +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 23:13, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Christophe,
> I have noticed failures on hypot-long-double.cc on arm, so I suggest we add:
>
> diff --git
> a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/hypot-long-double.cc
> b/libstdc++
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 23:13, Rainer Orth wrote:
>
> Hi Christophe,
>
> > I have noticed failures on hypot-long-double.cc on arm, so I suggest we add:
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/hypot-long-double.cc
> > b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cma
Hi Christophe,
> I have noticed failures on hypot-long-double.cc on arm, so I suggest we add:
>
> diff --git
> a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/hypot-long-double.cc
> b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/hypot-long-double.cc
> index 8a05473..4c2e33b 100644
> --- a/l
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 at 16:54, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> Split the long double testing into a separate file, so that we can XFAIL
> targets where the long double precision doesn't meet the expected
> tolerances. The float and double tests are still expefted to PASS for
> all targets.
>
> PR
Split the long double testing into a separate file, so that we can XFAIL
targets where the long double precision doesn't meet the expected
tolerances. The float and double tests are still expefted to PASS for
all targets.
PR libstdc++/78179
* testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/hy
14 matches
Mail list logo
