--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-10 00:15 ---
Subject: Bug 38763
Author: pault
Date: Sat Jan 10 00:15:37 2009
New Revision: 143238
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143238
Log:
2009-01-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-10 00:21 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-10 00:21 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-10 21:01 ---
Subject: Bug 38665
Author: pault
Date: Sat Jan 10 21:01:14 2009
New Revision: 143248
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143248
Log:
2009-01-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-10 21:06 ---
Subject: Bug 38657
Author: pault
Date: Sat Jan 10 21:06:27 2009
New Revision: 143249
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143249
Log:
2009-01-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-10 21:25 ---
Subject: Bug 38665
Author: pault
Date: Sat Jan 10 21:24:54 2009
New Revision: 143250
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143250
Log:
2009-01-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-10 21:41 ---
Subject: Bug 38665
Author: pault
Date: Sat Jan 10 21:41:16 2009
New Revision: 143252
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143252
Log:
2009-01-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-10 21:44 ---
Fixed on trunk and latest 4.3
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38665
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-10 21:44 ---
Fixed on trunk and latest 4.3
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-10 21:45 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.3
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38802
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-11 13:42 ---
Subject: Bug 38765
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jan 11 13:42:32 2009
New Revision: 143271
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143271
Log:
2009-01-11 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-11 13:42 ---
Subject: Bug 38763
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jan 11 13:42:32 2009
New Revision: 143271
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143271
Log:
2009-01-11 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-12 06:21 ---
This does the job:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/trans-array.c (revision 143242)
+++ gcc/fortran/trans-array.c (working copy
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-12 06:22 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.3. Thanks for the reort.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-12 06:23 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.3. Thanks for the reort.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #20 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-12 16:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=17079)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17079&action=view)
A preliminary patch for the PR
A slightly earlier version of this regtested OK. Will do it to this
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-15 09:19 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This would mean an ABI change, but it is worth thinking about.
>
The required fix is trivial, although I have not regtested yet; eliminate
1127-1131 in trans-common.c.
Cheers
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-17 08:39 ---
The fix has caused the regression reported in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-01/msg00197.html so I am reverting on trunk
and 4.3.
Cheers
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-17 09:29 ---
Subject: Bug 38657
Author: pault
Date: Sat Jan 17 09:28:50 2009
New Revision: 143458
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143458
Log:
2009-01-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #14 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-17 09:44 ---
Subject: Bug 38657
Author: pault
Date: Sat Jan 17 09:43:57 2009
New Revision: 143459
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143459
Log:
2009-01-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #22 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-17 11:32 ---
Subject: Bug 34955
Author: pault
Date: Sat Jan 17 11:32:02 2009
New Revision: 143462
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143462
Log:
2009-01-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #23 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-17 11:34 ---
Fixed on trunk.
Thanks for the report and sorry that it took so long to fix.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-17 11:58 ---
Subject: Bug 38657
Author: pault
Date: Sat Jan 17 11:58:48 2009
New Revision: 143463
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143463
Log:
2009-01-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-19 23:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=17148)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17148&action=view)
A patch for the PR
This regtests and bootstraps on FC9/x86_i64. I'll do ChangeLogs and so on
tomor
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-20 05:54 ---
Ticked off 4.4...:-)
Cheers
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-20 21:57 ---
Subject: Bug 38907
Author: pault
Date: Tue Jan 20 21:56:49 2009
New Revision: 143530
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143530
Log:
2009-01-20 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-20 21:59 ---
Fixed on trunk
Thanks for the report.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-21 20:22 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-01/msg00937.html
>
Richard,
I am not sure that any of the gfortran developers have the skills to deal with
this. I read the words about can
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-22 12:33 ---
This has a trivial fix:
expr.c: 2913 becomes
if (have_pointer && lvalue->symtree->n.sym->attr.data)
Sorry about the lack of a diff - I will remedy this on submission:-)
paul
--
pault at gc
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-22 12:39 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
>In the latter case, it is non-empty if ubound > lbound only. Comparing
> ubound and lbound according to the stride to check for zero-sized arra
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-22 15:00 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Confirm. ICE with 4.1.x and 4.2.x and wrong code with 4.3.x and 4.4.
>
> Thanks for the report.
>
The character length is being incorrectly set to 1 for the failing assignme
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-22 20:16 ---
I am just about to post a fix.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-24 12:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=17174)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17174&action=view)
Fix for the PR -
OK'd http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-01/msg00297.html
2009-01-22 Paul Thomas
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-24 12:54 ---
See PR38918 for fix
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-25 18:21 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > (In reply to comment #3)
>
> >In the latter case, it is non-empty if ubound > lbound only. Comparing
> > ubound and lbound accor
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-25 21:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=17182)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17182&action=view)
A provisional patch for the PR
It take back what I said previously:-)
The attached bootstraps and regt
--- Comment #17 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-26 05:12 ---
Subject: Bug 38657
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jan 26 05:12:03 2009
New Revision: 143669
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143669
Log:
2009-01-26 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #18 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-26 05:13 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.3
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-26 05:43 ---
Subject: Bug 38859
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jan 26 05:43:44 2009
New Revision: 143670
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143670
Log:
2009-01-26 Mikael Morin
PR fortr
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-26 05:44 ---
Closed on trunk and 4.3.
Once again, thanks for the report.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-26 06:15 ---
Subject: Bug 38907
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jan 26 06:15:41 2009
New Revision: 143671
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143671
Log:
2009-01-26 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-26 06:16 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.3
Thanks for the report and thanks to Mikael for the fix.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-27 12:16 ---
I have done most of the work on the corner cases and the fix below looks good.
I am marking it as pending for temporary book-keeping purposes.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-27 20:53 ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-01/msg00217.html and subsequent
postings.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-28 06:21 ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-01/msg00331.html
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-28 17:31 ---
*** Bug 39006 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-28 17:31 ---
This is the same as PR38852 and the fix for that one works for this too.
Paul
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 38852 ***
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-28 17:33 ---
Marked up the severity to that of PR39006.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-28 20:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=17204)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17204&action=view)
Updated patch
Following discussion on fortran list and #gfortran, a more restrictive test is
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-28 21:49 ---
Subject: Bug 39006
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jan 28 21:48:53 2009
New Revision: 143743
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143743
Log:
2009-01-28 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/38852
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-28 21:49 ---
Subject: Bug 38852
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jan 28 21:48:53 2009
New Revision: 143743
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143743
Log:
2009-01-28 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/38852
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-28 21:52 ---
Fixed on trunk.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-04 09:10 ---
Dominique,
Thanks for setting this up. I'll poll everybody involved for contributions and
have assigned myself the bug(s).
Cheers
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Re
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-04 09:29 ---
see PR40006: allow type cheating for procedures with an implicit interface""
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-04 09:31 ---
...and PR39896 : "ICE with -fwhole-file"
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-04 10:19 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> It may be worth noting that there are no warnings in the application about
> labels not being in the same block as the corresponding GOTO if compiled
> without -fwhole-file, but if
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-04 10:31 ---
> For some reason that I do not see right now, cs_base in resolve.c is not being
> pushed or popped correctly.
Ah yes! resolve_codes nulls out cs_base. The problem is fixed by storing
cs_base before c
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-04 10:32 ---
I guess that I should take it :-)
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-05 18:12 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
...snip...
> [ibook-dhum] f90/bug% a.out
> 42
> 42
> Abort
>
This turns out to be the same bug as that which caused the segfault in
gas_dyn.f90.
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-06 20:46 ---
This fixes it and is regtesting right now.
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/trans-array.c (revision 147128)
+++ gcc/fortran/trans
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-07 04:44 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> The patch in comment #4 fixes this pr, but gives:
>
> .*: internal compiler error: in fold_convert, at fold-const.c:2551
Yes... I went to bed when the regression test started sp
--- Comment #17 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-10 07:23 ---
Subject: Bug 38863
Author: pault
Date: Sun May 10 07:23:30 2009
New Revision: 147329
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147329
Log:
2009-05-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #18 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-10 08:56 ---
Problem in comment #1 is fixed on trunk.
Cheers
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-10 10:21 ---
Subject: Bug 40018
Author: pault
Date: Sun May 10 10:21:08 2009
New Revision: 147331
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147331
Log:
2009-05-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-10 10:22 ---
Subject: Bug 40018
Author: pault
Date: Sun May 10 10:22:37 2009
New Revision: 147332
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147332
Log:
2009-05-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-10 10:44 ---
Subject: Bug 39879
Author: pault
Date: Sun May 10 10:44:22 2009
New Revision: 147336
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147336
Log:
2009-05-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #19 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-10 15:35 ---
Subject: Bug 38863
Author: pault
Date: Sun May 10 15:34:55 2009
New Revision: 147345
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147345
Log:
2009-05-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #14 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-10 16:09 ---
Subject: Bug 39879
Author: pault
Date: Sun May 10 16:09:02 2009
New Revision: 147346
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147346
Log:
2009-05-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #15 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-10 16:09 ---
Fixed on 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5 - thanks for the report.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-10 16:14 ---
Subject: Bug 40018
Author: pault
Date: Sun May 10 16:14:37 2009
New Revision: 147347
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147347
Log:
2009-05-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-10 16:15 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.4
Thanks for the report
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-12 06:07 ---
Since I am working on it, I had better take it :-)
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-18 04:46 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> In the following program, env%n should be equal to zero when entering the
> routine "titi" but one gets the output :
>
> 10 0
>5 10
>
> instead of
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-19 05:06 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Can you attach a working example? I failed to apply your patch and figure out
> which diffed file is what.
>
Hi Tobias,
It's a reversed diff!
Hi Thomas,
Works for me
--- Comment #19 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-22 13:40 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> the patch posted here:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-05/msg00244.html
> allows cp2k in its single source file form, 640klines as made available in
> PR40005, to compile
--- Comment #24 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-29 15:33 ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> I've added a 'related' PR40275 on -combine not working for Fortran. I think
> that as soon as the -fwhole-file patch is added (default or not yet ;-) there
> would
--- Comment #27 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-30 08:27 ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> > types that are identical
> I'm not sure this is related, but note comment #8. Even identical types are
> not
> identical, unless they are sequence type.
Joo
--- Comment #28 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-01 18:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=17942)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17942&action=view)
A progression of -fwhole-file
This patch is as far as I have got. It incorporates module procedures a
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-11 05:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=17980)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17980&action=view)
Fix for the problem
This regtests and bootstraps on trunk.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-11 06:21 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I forgot to add that this demonstrates a proper fix. At the moment, it
generates an extra, spurious error. I'll see if I cannot do a proper job
tonight.
Je vous remercie pour le ra
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-11 20:12 ---
Subject: Bug 40402
Author: pault
Date: Thu Jun 11 20:11:59 2009
New Revision: 148396
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148396
Log:
2009-06-11 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-12 05:20 ---
Confirmed on FC8/x86 running in a VMware on an XP professional machine if
you get that:-)
Anyway, it's not limited to Darwin nor to 64 bits. It's not present, as far as
I can tell with gcc-4.
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-13 15:52 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Changing
type :: polarization_t
logical :: polarized = .false.
integer :: spin_type = 0
integer :: multiplicity = 0
type(state_matrix_t) :: state
end type
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-15 13:21 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Paul, I CC you as you are our generic-resolution expert.
Well, gosh golly, that's a mantle that I did not seek:-)
Note that my account at the CC address is no longer valid - I
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-18 09:44 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Juergen: Thanks for the report, but it is not a regression - it might not
> crash
> with 4.3 (or your 4.4) but I think that's just by chance.
>
> Paul, I think also t
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-18 20:51 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > I am not sure that your testcase should be allowed at all! I am not sure
> > that
> > I understand what it means.
>
> I think it is valid and not different
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-19 00:20 ---
Adding at trans-expr.c:2740
&& !(e->symtree && e->symtree->n.sym->attr.pointer)
eliminates the problem in the reduced testcase and allows the original testcase
to run correctly.
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-19 21:58 ---
Subject: Bug 40440
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jun 19 21:58:27 2009
New Revision: 148731
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148731
Log:
2009-06-19 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-19 22:10 ---
Subject: Bug 40402
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jun 19 22:10:45 2009
New Revision: 148732
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148732
Log:
2009-06-20 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-19 22:11 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.4.
Thanks for the report
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-20 09:21 ---
Subject: Bug 39800
Author: pault
Date: Sat Jun 20 09:21:06 2009
New Revision: 148741
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148741
Log:
2009-06-20 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-20 09:22 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.4.
Thanks for the report.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-20 09:58 ---
This one must be fixed. When the upper limit on array simplification was
removed, it was with initialization expressions in mind. In this case, the
assignment compiles and runs at a sensible pace if there is no
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-20 10:00 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> > Probably a duplicate of pr34554
>
> Essentially yes, but the compile-time simplifier for spread (and others) was
> introduced only recently.
As I say above, this is not an
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-21 07:42 ---
This should be relatively easy to fix - I have not looked yet but I am rather
sure I know what to do and where to do it.
Cheers
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-22 04:39 ---
Subject: Bug 40472
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jun 22 04:39:40 2009
New Revision: 148775
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148775
Log:
2009-06-22 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-22 04:41 ---
Subject: Bug 40443
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jun 22 04:41:10 2009
New Revision: 148776
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148776
Log:
2009-06-22 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-22 04:42 ---
Subject: Bug 40443
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jun 22 04:41:53 2009
New Revision: 148777
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148777
Log:
2009-06-22 Paul Thomas
PR fortr
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-22 04:48 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Paul, what's your point of view on replacing the linear list by the splay-tree
> ('con_by_offset' in gfc_expr)?
>
I do not know enough about splay trees to
401 - 500 of 3045 matches
Mail list logo
