------- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-18 09:44 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Juergen: Thanks for the report, but it is not a regression - it might not > crash > with 4.3 (or your 4.4) but I think that's just by chance. > > Paul, I think also this bug touches code for which you have the expertise. > > The problem is the automatic deallocation of an allocatable component. The DT > with this component is returned by a function but treated as variable and not > as function. The crucial part is that the return value is a pointer! If I
Yeeees.... there is a bug there somewhere. I shall have to think this through. I am not sure that your testcase should be allowed at all! I am not sure that I understand what it means. Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40440
