------- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-19 00:20 -------
Adding at trans-expr.c:2740
&& !(e->symtree && e->symtree->n.sym->attr.pointer)
eliminates the problem in the reduced testcase and allows the original testcase
to run correctly. This has not been regtested yet - even if it introduces
regressions, it will be a question of getting the condition right. Notice that
pointer variables need to be excluded from deallocation of allocatable
components too.
My tree is sourced from a more recent version of svn than is available on the
system that I am using - hence the lack of a diff.
It's mine :-)
Cheers
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2009-06-15 13:09:45 |2009-06-19 00:20:01
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40440
