------- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-22 12:39 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> In the latter case, it is non-empty if ubound > lbound only. Comparing
> ubound and lbound according to the stride to check for zero-sized arrays
> doesn't make sense in this case (see dimension 2 of dla).
Indeed - the fix can be done in gfc_conv_intrinsic_bound. I will regtest
tonight and submit accordingly.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2009-01-15 05:57:57 |2009-01-22 12:39:50
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38852
