https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102301
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120671
Bug ID: 120671
Summary: Failure to fold AND+PTEST to ANDS for SVE
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: aarch64-sve, missed-optimization
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120664
Matthias Kretz (Vir) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-16
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120670
Bug ID: 120670
Summary: vector_loop caused FAIL:
go.test/test/fixedbugs/issue13160.go execution, -O2
-g
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120669
Bug ID: 120669
Summary: overloading of constructor of type that have an
implicit dereference
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118150
Spencer Abson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109393
Haochen Jiang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haochen.jiang at intel dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109393
--- Comment #13 from Haochen Jiang ---
One thing forget to mention, we definitely could handle this at the backend,
but my question is if this optimization has more pros than cons.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109393
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120641
--- Comment #8 from Pierre Ossman ---
It seems strange to make life difficult for all ARM users, just to warn anyone
that might potentially use GCC 6 and GCC 15 at the same time.
Can we make sure that flag is the default in our build of the com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120670
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120672
Bug ID: 120672
Summary: Failure to fold BIC+PTEST to BICS for SVE
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: aarch64-sve, missed-optimization
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99667
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
(within -fanalyzer, that is)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120661
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> This is in main, I only see one create_basic_block there during expansion
> (the one added on edge from ENTRY to ENTRY->succ) and no remove_edge, no
> further e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120676
Bug ID: 120676
Summary: Internal compiler error: in push_namespace (in modules
app)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118551
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
I am happy it helps. I wonder if you can share details of your SPEC config.
I.e. how you call perf (do you specify count etc) and how you handle merging of
profiles.
We now have regular tester (on AMD hardwa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59786
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120677
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> s/gsi_start_bb/gsi_after_labels/ ?
Yes looking at other locations that do that it is that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82036
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||12.4.1, 13.4.1, 14.3.1
K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120677
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108909
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ---
Patches are always welcome!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120670
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
[hjl@gnu-tgl-3 pr120670]$ cat go-memclr.c
#include
void memclrNoHeapPointers(void *, size_t)
__asm__ ("" "runtime.memclrNoHeapPointers")
__attribute__ ((no_split_stack));
void
memclrNoHeapPointers (void *p1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120328
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119769
Simon Sobisch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119933
Simon Sobisch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simonsobisch at gnu dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119636
--- Comment #5 from Simon Sobisch ---
Note: While I'm all for cleaning up COBOL code, we do run some programs that
still have that in... ignoring (possibly with a warning, but for other
compilers you have to enable outputting those) would be muc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120678
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120273
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3b95be7bd1882add4b1e22f6b70bc130cd465eca
commit r16-1534-g3b95be7bd1882add4b1e22f6b70bc130cd465eca
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120685
Bug ID: 120685
Summary: GCC Crashes After C++23 auto(t) Warning Instead of
Graceful Error
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119805
--- Comment #5 from Simon Sobisch ---
I possibly need to wait one day more (just tested with the godbolt snapshot
from yesterday)... but there:
* compiles as expected with dialects gnu and mf
* raises the same error message without dialect or w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118551
--- Comment #7 from Hongtao Liu ---
Looks like it's fixed by r16-1521-g2ef043c5a05d99
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118551
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 16.0.0 20250616 (experimental) (GCC)
[513] %
[513] % time gcctk -O2 small.c
real0m0.217s
user0m0.069s
sys 0m0.014s
[514] % time gcctk -O3 small.c
real
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120675
Bug ID: 120675
Summary: Missed loop invariant code elimination from loop
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120655
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120661
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Macleod ---
>
> Im not sure the best solution immediately... Let me experiment
btw, that is for the second testcase at -Os. The first one is a similar
situation, with a different calculation... but it is again c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120677
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The problem is obvious:
gimple_stmt_iterator si = gsi_start_bb (output_crc->bb);
gsi_insert_before (&si, call, GSI_SAME_STMT);
This will insert before labels.
I am not in front of computer to recommend the
sable-bootstrap
--enable-checking=yes --prefix=/local/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 16.0.0 20250616 (experimental) (GCC)
[580] %
[580] % gcct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120677
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization
Target Milestone|15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120677
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|16.0|15.2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120677
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|16.0|15.2
Summary|[16 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120677
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120666
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Can you please get us the preprocessed sources for each of the TUs in the link
when it fails?
It would also help to have the full build instructions for ffmpeg you used, gcc
-v, and the full build output.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120666
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-16
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109393
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118551
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59786
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this was fixed a few weeks ago.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46299
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by James K. Lowden :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f298fabf3f10bcc426b41c23f90a5b90d694730d
commit r16-1531-gf298fabf3f10bcc426b41c23f90a5b90d694730d
Author: James K. Lowden
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120677
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
s/gsi_start_bb/gsi_after_labels/ ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120678
Bug ID: 120678
Summary: __is_trivially_destructible should take 1 arg, not -1
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108909
--- Comment #12 from Eric Reischer ---
Is there a plan to fix this? It seems to be in a perpetual retarget loop.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120673
Bug ID: 120673
Summary: Mutually dependent types crash the compiler
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99667
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120677
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120669
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119695
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120554
--- Comment #13 from James K. Lowden ---
The code now reads,
cbl_declarative_t& operator=(const cbl_declarative_t&) = default;
Can I mark this PR as resolved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120665
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119324
--- Comment #12 from James K. Lowden ---
As of today, except for gcc/cobol/genapi.cc, I have only a couple dozen
outstanding reports from cppcheck. One deserves attention at some point but is
not causing a problem. Most are cppcheck failing to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120679
Bug ID: 120679
Summary: nvptx stl support for automatic mapping is slow and
not asynchronous despite cuda supporting that. also
#pragma omp requires unified_shared_memory is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, if cbldiag.h would want to avoid including the 3 gcc headers, it could
perhaps
#if (CHECKING_P && GCC_VERSION >= 4001) || GCC_VERSION == BUILDING_GCC_VERSION
#define ATTRIBUTE_GCOBOL_DIAG(m, n) __attri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120674
Bug ID: 120674
Summary: [riscv][dwarf] internal compiler error: in
int_loc_descriptor, at dwarf2out.cc:14520
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120667
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.1.0, 16.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51961
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3b276fe0d22f9052657dbbffbb8ad6f8585bd304
commit r16-1528-g3b276fe0d22f9052657dbbffbb8ad6f8585bd304
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119769
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119805
--- Comment #4 from James K. Lowden ---
Patch was applied. Please confirm it meets your expectations.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120680
Bug ID: 120680
Summary: [nvptx] Linker errors with absent weak symbol
'zoneinfo_dir_override'
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118551
--- Comment #10 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #9)
> I am happy it helps. I wonder if you can share details of your SPEC config.
> I.e. how you call perf (do you specify count etc) and how you handle merging
> of pro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120683
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-16
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120670
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |go
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120681
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeevitha at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120681
Bug ID: 120681
Summary: PowerPC GCC turns off pc-relative addressing on
power10 when -mcmodel=large is used
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120666
--- Comment #2 from BBK ---
I cherry-picked the change from "See also
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116674"; to gcc-14 branch and
tested the reult toolchain.
FFmpeg built without problem now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120681
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 61651
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61651&action=edit
Test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120665
--- Comment #2 from Dennis ---
Yes, these are good warnings — definitely better than a GNAT bug message :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120683
Bug ID: 120683
Summary: vector_loop generates horrible prologue and epilogue
on memset
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120682
Bug ID: 120682
Summary: declare mapper does not work with templates
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120684
Bug ID: 120684
Summary: bogus "error: destroying ‘’ outside its
lifetime" with constexpr dtor object inside
range-based for
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120684
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|bogus "error: destroying|[15/16 Regression] bogus
83 matches
Mail list logo
