https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46299
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
Keywords| |needs-stdcheck
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think that the crayftn diagnostic is wrong.
Since A is made accessible by host-association, its use in a specification
expression is fine. See also the discussion in pr119994.
Can we resolve this one as invalid?
