https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119419
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118939
Adrian Bunk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bunk at stusta dot de
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119424
Bug ID: 119424
Summary: memcpy->memset optimization should happen even for
non-constant form of memcpy
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyword
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118939
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119401
Bug ID: 119401
Summary: [15 regression] ICE when lambda is used as template
argument in member function parameter type
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119386
--- Comment #31 from Alexander Monakov ---
I am certainly missing some interesting history here, because on one hand, I
see that a.out uses call-pop combo in function prologue to find out current PC,
and then uses %ebx-relative addressing in PIC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119361
--- Comment #4 from Robin Dapp ---
(In reply to Edwin Lu from comment #3)
> I'm not familiar enough with how the two modes interact with each other but
> I guess my question is, why do we have so many conversions between the two
> modes? What's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119401
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
Bug 16994 depends on bug 114292, which changed state.
Bug 114292 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE with a generic (templated) lambda
capturing a constant for VLA allocation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114292
What|Remov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111055
--- Comment #16 from Tomasz Kamiński ---
The changes are also required for .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116225
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119291
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60839
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60839&action=edit
testcase that aborts instead of infinite loop
This testcase makes it easier to put into the testsuite.
It abor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119386
--- Comment #32 from Ard Biesheuvel ---
Franz, given that you are building your own compiler, mind checking whether the
below fixes the issue for you?
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
@@ -23154,6 +23154,8 @@
if (fl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119403
Bug ID: 119403
Summary: Typo in Interface mismatch in dummy procedure at %L
conflichts with %L: %s
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119291
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60840|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119404
Bug ID: 119404
Summary: Possible typo in: Usa LRA for reload instead of the
old reload framework
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119291
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|11.5.0 |8.5.0
Known to fail|12.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119405
Bug ID: 119405
Summary: Missed FMA optimization for C code present in C++
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119349
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f344846a62c8863375909d8d6b435b4b5fd35a0
commit r15-8481-g0f344846a62c8863375909d8d6b435b4b5fd35a0
Author: Andre Vehreschild
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119404
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119396
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
What I have already tried is to set
SHLIB_LINK :=
in t-avr, which should imply enable_shared=no. But it had no effect.
Also I don't know where SHLIB_LINK should be set. In the top-level configure.ac
?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119410
Bug ID: 119410
Summary: 5% slowdown of 510.parest_r on Intel Ice Lake
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119399
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-03-21
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101995
--- Comment #16 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Still present.
Perhaps more significantly (and possibly related)
class x
{
public:
x ();
int func ();
private:
int a;
};
int g ()
{
x b;
return b.func();
}
generates:
g():
push
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119380
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a5c69abf1384ec6163cd5e14146e8b3876e8b95c
commit r15-8642-ga5c69abf1384ec6163cd5e14146e8b3876e8b95c
Author: Andre Vehreschild
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119386
--- Comment #30 from Alexander Monakov ---
Sorry, sent too soon: a.out had the concept of PLT as well as GOT:
https://gcc.gnu.org/cgit/gcc/tree/gcc/config/i386/i386.c?id=c98f874233428d7e6ba83def7842fd703ac0ddf1#n820
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119380
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
Summary|[12,13,1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811
--- Comment #21 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-March/678597.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114292
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Simon Martin
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:65e998d172e006cdf0dd4d58f83784a5fed61fc5
commit r13-9441-g65e998d172e006cdf0dd4d58f83784a5fed61fc5
Author: Simon Martin
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105212
Honki Tonk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|13.1.0 |14.2.0
--- Comment #3 from Honki Tonk ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119409
Bug ID: 119409
Summary: should not include all of
and
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119405
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
We already have the -fexcess-precision=standard difference between gnu++ and
c++ modes. That only changed recently for C++, which might be why fp-contract
isn't the same between C and C++.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119291
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60839|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119376
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:37ae2e055687a22974d7bcb9e618f258fa49ab1a
commit r15-8492-g37ae2e055687a22974d7bcb9e618f258fa49ab1a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119408
Bug ID: 119408
Summary: LoongArch: Q Suffix for __float128 Literals Not
Supported
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119390
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
#9 lang_specific_driver (in_decoded_options=0x7fffd970,
in_decoded_options_count=0x7fffd97c,
in_added_libraries=) at ../../gcc/cobol/gcobolspec.cc:510
510 strcpy(ach, de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119409
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Similarly:
include/std/chrono:# include
include/std/chrono:# include
include/std/chrono:# include
include/std/flat_map:#include // not_fn
include/std/flat_map:#include // views::zip
include/std/flat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119349
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119405
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
If you used -std=gnu11, -std=gnu++11 then the setting would be -ffp-contract=on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118545
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:47822ef8f1b03ab7124aba694709825a93897994
commit r15-8477-g47822ef8f1b03ab7124aba694709825a93897994
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Fri M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119405
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106902#c36
So this is by design. Except maybe C++ front-end should change too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119405
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am going to leave this open for a C++ front-end person to decide if they want
to make the change to be similar to the C front-end here.
BUT the C front-end is doing it by design. If you want something di
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119405
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Setting to =off for -std=c* (and not -std=c++*) was done in
r0-126303-g6dbe09581a1349.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119405
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |c++
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119380
--- Comment #4 from Andre Vehreschild ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #1)
> Is the known-to-fail list correct?
> I do not see failures for 11- and 12-releases.
>
> The dump tree also changes only between 12 and 13.
> To me it looks rather
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119241
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60834|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119241
--- Comment #25 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a62893d71c5f48fd7780957e1ad1a4f38f351728
commit r15-8482-ga62893d71c5f48fd7780957e1ad1a4f38f351728
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119291
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note disabling combine (-fdisable-rtl-combine) works around the issue.
So we know what is coming out of expand is correct.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119235
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b383ae2a6e5fc0530bfd8b86ad0e6b27e760bd2
commit r15-8483-g2b383ae2a6e5fc0530bfd8b86ad0e6b27e760bd2
Author: Stefan Sch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119405
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
IMO the different behavior between gnu and non-gnu is odd.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119399
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Note the possible UB is in the POINTER_DIFF_EXPR _25 = p_12(D) - _7 which
we should arguably not use but instead use an integer type difference when
different objects are involved.
Still the actual alias c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119406
Bug ID: 119406
Summary: Typo in Index variable %qs at %L cannot be specified
in alocality-spec
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119376
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:589c94da22ec71fe8518878e801e88b05deffe18
commit r15-8493-g589c94da22ec71fe8518878e801e88b05deffe18
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119408
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Q is an extension, 1.1f128 should work. The extension is enabled only for
some platforms.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811
--- Comment #22 from Christophe Lyon ---
Bootstrap on arm-linux-gnueabihf passes, 'make check' too.
Sorry for the delay, I was trying to understand an ICE
gcc.target/arm/mve/general/preserve_user_namespace_1.c after I bootstrapped
with your pat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119377
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119408
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119408
--- Comment #2 from Zhou Qiankang ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Q is an extension, 1.1f128 should work. The extension is enabled only
> for some platforms.
But this extension (__flaot128) actually enables on LoongArch6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119386
--- Comment #34 from Alexander Monakov ---
We have -mcmodel=kernel already, which is incompatible with -fpic.
Ard, where is -fpic in the kernel context coming from? Kernel's top-level
Makefile passes -fno-PIE, and arch/x86/Makefile passes -mcmo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119414
Bug ID: 119414
Summary: cobol driver unconditionally adds platform-specific
command line options.
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119408
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
--- Comment #5 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119386
--- Comment #38 from Alexander Monakov ---
(In reply to Ard Biesheuvel from comment #37)
> Yes, we can drop -mcmodel=kernel, and use -mcmodel=small instead. This is
> why I'm not keen on relying on that - it is ill-defined and there is really
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119386
--- Comment #39 from Ard Biesheuvel ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #38)
> (In reply to Ard Biesheuvel from comment #37)
> > Yes, we can drop -mcmodel=kernel, and use -mcmodel=small instead. This is
> > why I'm not keen on relyin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119415
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114992
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119413
Bug ID: 119413
Summary: [15 Regression] 11% slowdown (but only 3% regression
against GGC 14) of 507.cactuBSSN_r on Aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119380
--- Comment #7 from Damian Rouson ---
Thanks, Andre!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119408
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119411
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91614
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15|[12/13/14 regression][arm]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119407
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119416
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119415
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
There are no "official contributors", anyone who submits patches is a
contributor:
https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114992
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41db4716a5603052df626a1ab911b0b3fab322b2
commit r13-9442-g41db4716a5603052df626a1ab911b0b3fab322b2
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119421
Bug ID: 119421
Summary: [avr] Better optimize some operations involving bits
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119420
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119421
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119420
Bug ID: 119420
Summary: `a >> 1 == 0` should be trasformed into `((unsigned)a)
<= 1`
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimiza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114292
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] ICE with |[12 Regression] ICE with a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119417
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60846
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60846&action=edit
Self contained testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119411
Bug ID: 119411
Summary: [15 Regression] 5% slowdown of 505.mcf_r on Aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119411
--- Comment #1 from Filip Kastl ---
>
here there should have been "GCC 14" inserted into my bugreporting template :D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119408
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4)
> The reason is we already added __float128 for "compatibility with existing
> code" so it makes sense to add Q as well. And we have "use a suffix ‘q’ or
> ‘Q’ for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118939
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119412
Bug ID: 119412
Summary: 7% slowdown of 482.sphinx3 on Aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114992
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab716829da7c885b97ac2649c7c0ff5c7703ffa5
commit r15-8651-gab716829da7c885b97ac2649c7c0ff5c7703ffa5
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119406
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119403
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:00cbf03029267b3bdfb696aa09c9a36dbeeb51aa
commit r15-8652-g00cbf03029267b3bdfb696aa09c9a36dbeeb51aa
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119403
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119422
Bug ID: 119422
Summary: `u <= (u <= (unsigned)b)` can be transform into just
`(u <= (unsigned)b)`
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119391
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And for GCC 16, perhaps we can keep existing behavior and just set overflow
flag on the result whenever it is pedantically invalid. So for the cases like
negative shift count or left shift of signed negati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119417
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119415
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
(In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #0)
> As an aside, seems like Tomasz recently became an "official"
> contributor/maintainer of libstdc++ based on his numerous valuable libstdc++
> submission. I am just purely curi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119407
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |tree-optimization
Severity|no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119386
--- Comment #35 from Ard Biesheuvel ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #34)
> We have -mcmodel=kernel already, which is incompatible with -fpic.
>
> Ard, where is -fpic in the kernel context coming from? Kernel's top-level
> Makefi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119403
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119417
Bug ID: 119417
Summary: -fexpensive-optimizations forces GCC 14 to use uxtw
instead of uxth causing different result on ADD
instruction
Product: gcc
Version: 14.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119390
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|cobol compiler crashes with |stack buffer overflow in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119417
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.3.0
Summary|-fexpensive-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119417
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
