https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119410
Bug ID: 119410 Summary: 5% slowdown of 510.parest_r on Intel Ice Lake Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org Blocks: 26163 Target Milestone: --- Host: x86_64-linux Target: x86_64-linux As seen here https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=796.457.0 https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=801.457.0 there was a 5% exec time slowdown of the 510.parest_t SPEC 2017 benchmark between commits r15-7978-g7efe3aa9b5d4d7 r15-8017-g4e6967aba1aaa9 when run with -Ofast -march=native, with and withou -flto on an Intel Ice Lake (3rd generation Xeon) machine. This is *not* a regression against GCC 14. See the comparison here: https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.4=1093.457.0&plot.5=801.457.0& https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.4=1097.457.0&plot.5=796.457.0& Referenced Bugs: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 [Bug 26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)