https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119380
--- Comment #4 from Andre Vehreschild <vehre at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #1) > Is the known-to-fail list correct? > I do not see failures for 11- and 12-releases. > > The dump tree also changes only between 12 and 13. > To me it looks rather like a 13/14/15 regression. I misunderstood this as a regression and looked for a known good version of v 11 branching off of master. Unfortunately that branch point 250f234988b6231669a720c52101d3686d645072 also fails the test. I therefore errorneously assumed that all versions are affected. I tried to add a 11-version to the known to fail list and 11.1.0 was the first one accepted. The other versions I took from Damian's report, trusting he has tested them.
