[Bug fortran/70842] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error with character members within a polymorphic pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #16 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/70614] [4.9/5 Regression] GCC gets stuck with -O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70614 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener

[Bug lto/70929] [4.9/5/6/7 regression] Cross-module inlining for functions having argument passed by reference is no longer working.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70929 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener

[Bug fortran/71066] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in set_loop_bounds, at fortran/trans-array.c:4680

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71066 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener

[Bug rtl-optimization/71119] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ftoit instruction not emitted for double -> long bitcast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71119 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener

[Bug c/71115] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Missing warning: excess elements in struct initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/71083] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] Unaligned bit-field address when predictive commoning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71083 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/71264] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE in convert_move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #18 from Richard Biener

[Bug inline-asm/71086] [4.9 Only] miscompiled inline-asm + alternative constraints + __builtin_expect + always_inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71086 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71451] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code on x86_64-linux-gnu: in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:22599

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71451 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/71464] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code (with redeclared constructor) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71464 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/71515] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on valid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71515 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/71665] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with non-integral constant enumerator value: in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:3918

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71665 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/71576] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE on valid C++11 code (with xvalue and bitfield) on x86_64-linux-gnu: in build_target_expr, at cp/tree.c:385

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71576 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/71662] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression][DR 1485] ICE on invalid C++11 code with unqualified name look up: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:14010

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71662 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener

[Bug target/71652] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in in ix86_target_macros_internal, at config/i386/i386-c.c:187

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71652 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener

[Bug fortran/71703] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree, at tree.c:1488

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71703 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener

[Bug middle-end/71700] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code with struct assignment with sub-word signed bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71700 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/71737] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE following 2x pack expansion in non-pack with template alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71737 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener

[Bug fortran/71723] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE with attempted pointer initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71723 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/71747] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code with misuse of overloaded operator '()': Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71747 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/71748] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE on valid (?) C++ template code invoking a base destructor: in build_base_path, at cp/class.c:304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71748 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/71575] [6/7 Regression] [graphite] internal compiler error: in copy_cond_phi_nodes, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2500

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71575 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |6.2 Summary|[4.9/6/7 Regress

[Bug fortran/71795] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] Two Bugs in array constructors (optimization)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71795 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener

[Bug middle-end/71762] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ~X & Y to X < Y doesn't work for uninitialized values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71762 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener

[Bug fortran/71861] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in write_symbol(): bad module symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71861 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/71784] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid code in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71784 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/71827] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code with non constant diff between two labels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71827 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener

[Bug fortran/71860] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on pointing to null(mold), verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71860 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/72786] New: Odd spelling suggestion with later defined macro: Suggestion is identical to unknown identifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72786 Bug ID: 72786 Summary: Odd spelling suggestion with later defined macro: Suggestion is identical to unknown identifier Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/72763] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] incorrectly accepts invalid C++11 code that instantiates a non-template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72763 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/72707] [4.9/5/6/7 regression] local anonymous union member hides names in the same scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72707 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

[Bug fortran/72714] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_array_init_size, at fortran/trans-array.c:5235

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72714 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/72764] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code instantiating an alias template: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in typedef_variant_p, at tree.c:126

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72764 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/72787] New: Query related to gcc-4_6-branch fix for Bug-49279 (Getting issue with __restrict type qualifier)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787 Bug ID: 72787 Summary: Query related to gcc-4_6-branch fix for Bug-49279 (Getting issue with __restrict type qualifier) Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/65151] [SH] Internal compiler error when trying to build libav 11.2 on sh4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65151 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c++/72415] [7 regression][concepts] ICE in satisfy_predicate_constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72415 --- Comment #2 from lucdanton at free dot fr --- I completely failed to make note that this used to compile on GCC 6.1, too (modulo the missing definition, again).

[Bug tree-optimization/71824] [6/7 Regression] ICE when compiling libiberty with Graphite loop optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71824 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |6.2

[Bug tree-optimization/71881] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with -g enabled on x86_64-linux-gnu: cannot update SSA form

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71881 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |6.2

[Bug c++/72415] [6/7 regression][concepts] ICE in satisfy_predicate_constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72415 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Started with r238558.

[Bug rtl-optimization/72778] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.c:451

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72778 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/72788] New: Stack unwinding fails since GCC 4.9 on i686 without -fexceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72788 Bug ID: 72788 Summary: Stack unwinding fails since GCC 4.9 on i686 without -fexceptions Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug regression/67288] [4.9 regression] non optimal simple function (useless additional shift/remove/shift/add)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67288 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug tree-optimization/72787] Query related to gcc-4_6-branch fix for Bug-49279 (Getting issue with __restrict type qualifier)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/72771] [6/7 Regression] powerpc64le ICE with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72771 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- Needs -O3 -mcpu=power9 -mno-lra, and a binutils that supports power9, to fail. Same on BE as on LE.

[Bug c++/72789] New: add -Wunused-private-field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72789 Bug ID: 72789 Summary: add -Wunused-private-field Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assign

[Bug debug/72779] ice when compiling included lambda pattern (internal compiler error: in is_base_type, at dwarf2out.c:9968)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72779 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/72775] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in finish_expr_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:677

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72775 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug gcov-profile/58250] -fprofile-use causes: "warning: -fprefetch-loop-arrays is not supported with -Os"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58250 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/72790] New: MOVE_ALLOC() of character looses content data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72790 Bug ID: 72790 Summary: MOVE_ALLOC() of character looses content data Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Prior

[Bug rtl-optimization/71984] [7 Regression] wrong code with -O -mavx512cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71984 mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug gcov-profile/69004] Building t-engine on ARM fails during -fprofile-use stage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69004 --- Comment #20 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to PeteVine from comment #19) > Here's what I've been doing to arrive at that profile-use crash: > > In the unpacked archive's top-level directory (see URL), edit premake4.lua Can you please check

[Bug gcov-profile/69004] Building t-engine on ARM fails during -fprofile-use stage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69004 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added URL|http://te4.org/dl/t-engine/ |http://te4.org/dl/t-engine/

[Bug c++/72786] Odd spelling suggestion with later defined macro: Suggestion is identical to unknown identifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72786 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Thanks for filing this. A two-liner fix for this would be to detect in best_match::get_best_meaningful_candidate if m_best_distance is 0, and if so return NULL, i.e. to not give a suggestion if somehow we

[Bug fortran/72791] New: Internal compiler error for reshape intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72791 Bug ID: 72791 Summary: Internal compiler error for reshape intrinsic Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: for

[Bug fortran/72699] [6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_check_dependency, at fortran/dependency.c:1257

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72699 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/72787] Query related to gcc-4_6-branch fix for Bug-49279 (Getting issue with __restrict type qualifier)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787 --- Comment #2 from martin --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > You can't rely on __builtin_object_size this way, please look up its > documentation. Hi Richard, Sorry, can you kindly throw some more pointers over this. Here is t

[Bug tree-optimization/72787] Query related to gcc-4_6-branch fix for Bug-49279 (Getting issue with __restrict type qualifier)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787 --- Comment #3 from martin --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > You can't rely on __builtin_object_size this way, please look up its > documentation. Hi Richard, Sorry, can you kindly throw some more pointers over this. Here is

[Bug tree-optimization/72772] Missed SCEV after pass reordering@236440

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72772 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- The patch has quite some fallout, including ICEs and wrong-code :/ FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/pr71403-1.c -O3 -g execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr35356-1.c scan-tree-dump graphite "if (P_9 >= P_1

[Bug tree-optimization/72787] Query related to gcc-4_6-branch fix for Bug-49279 (Getting issue with __restrict type qualifier)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, ranjan.winner at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787 > > --- Comment #2 from martin --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) >

[Bug libstdc++/72793] New: pointer_traits is too strict about rebinding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72793 Bug ID: 72793 Summary: pointer_traits is too strict about rebinding Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Pri

[Bug libstdc++/72792] New: allocator_traits is too strict about rebinding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72792 Bug ID: 72792 Summary: allocator_traits is too strict about rebinding Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal P

[Bug tree-optimization/72772] Missed SCEV after pass reordering@236440

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72772 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug gcov-profile/69004] Building t-engine on ARM fails during -fprofile-use stage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69004 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2015-12-23 00:00:00 |2016-8-3 --- Comment #22 from Martin Lišk

[Bug tree-optimization/72787] Query related to gcc-4_6-branch fix for Bug-49279 (Getting issue with __restrict type qualifier)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787 --- Comment #5 from martin --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4) > On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, ranjan.winner at gmail dot com wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787 > > > > --- Comment #2 from martin --- > > (In

[Bug tree-optimization/69848] poor vectorization of a loop from SPEC2006 464.h264ref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69848 --- Comment #12 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi Jim, May I ask which function in h264ref also shows this issue? I instrumented GCC and could not found a case in it. Thanks.

[Bug fortran/72791] Internal compiler error for reshape intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72791 --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Patrick Seewald from comment #0) > I get an internal compiler error (Segmentation fault) when compiling the > following program > > program reshape_bug >integer, dimension(2) :: or

[Bug libfortran/72790] MOVE_ALLOC() of character looses content data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72790 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug middle-end/70920] if ((intptr_t)ptr == 0) doesn't get simplified to if (ptr == 0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70920 mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/70677] Suboptimal cond on AVR: unneeded stack frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70677 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Aug 3 15:46:11 2016 New Revision: 239080 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239080&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR 70677 * common/config/avr/avr-common.c (avr_option_opt

[Bug tree-optimization/71815] SLSR misses several PHI candidate cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71815 --- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt --- I have a prototype that fixes this in the obvious way and it causes both slsr-35.c and slsr-36.c to pass again without turning off code hoisting. I'll do a regstrap and then work on some benchmark testing. I

[Bug c/72794] New: [7 regression'] CF on spec2000/176.gcc after r238862.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794 Bug ID: 72794 Summary: [7 regression'] CF on spec2000/176.gcc after r238862. Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug c/72794] [7 regression'] CF on spec2000/176.gcc after r238862.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Can you try with -std=gnu90 and see if that fixes the issue.

[Bug tree-optimization/69848] poor vectorization of a loop from SPEC2006 464.h264ref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69848 --- Comment #13 from Jim Wilson --- I think it was poc_ref_pic_reorder() in slice.c that triggered the ICE. I don't know if the original code shows the vectorization reduction problem. That might only be present in the reduced testcase.

[Bug tree-optimization/69848] poor vectorization of a loop from SPEC2006 464.h264ref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69848 --- Comment #14 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #13) > I think it was poc_ref_pic_reorder() in slice.c that triggered the ICE. I > don't know if the original code shows the vectorization reduction problem.

[Bug c/72783] Fortify scanf %s, %[ conversion specifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72783 --- Comment #1 from Florian Weimer --- Martin and I discussed this for a bit. The %ms hack does not work due to embedded NULs, which are copied to the destination buffer by scanf, do not terminate the string, and are (in most cases) detectable b

[Bug c/72794] [7 regression'] CF on spec2000/176.gcc after r238862.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794 --- Comment #2 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- Yes, this option cures CF. Does it mean that we must compile spec2000 with this flag? 2016-08-03 19:08 GMT+03:00 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org : > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794 > > --- Co

[Bug c/72794] [7 regression] CF on spec2000/176.gcc after r238862.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/65033] C++11 atomics: is_lock_free result does not always match the real lock-free property

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65033 --- Comment #11 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, torvald at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > The difference is unfortunate, but C11 specifies that atomic_is_lock_free is > *per object*. I suppose that any change there would h

[Bug target/71978] -mrealignstack and the unwinder

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71978 Rian Quinn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/72795] New: Missed optimization of external-linkage variables in presence of barriers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72795 Bug ID: 72795 Summary: Missed optimization of external-linkage variables in presence of barriers Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c++/72796] New: [7 Regression] Firefox build error: use of deleted function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72796 Bug ID: 72796 Summary: [7 Regression] Firefox build error: use of deleted function Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug c++/70616] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in build_base_path, at cp/class.c:303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70616 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71748] [5 Regression] ICE on valid (?) C++ template code invoking a base destructor: in build_base_path, at cp/class.c:304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71748 --- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell --- *** Bug 70616 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/72796] [7 Regression] Firefox build error: use of deleted function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72796 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- markus@x4 js % cat jsarray.ii struct a; template struct b { typedef a c; }; struct d { void e(int); }; struct a : d { void e(int) = delete; }; template struct g : b::c { g(int) { this->d::e(0);

[Bug c++/72759] [6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (Segmentation fault, tree_class_check, ocp_convert)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72759 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c/72797] New: bogus -Wmisleading-indentation with -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 on a multi-statement macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72797 Bug ID: 72797 Summary: bogus -Wmisleading-indentation with -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 on a multi-statement macro Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug rtl-optimization/72778] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.c:451

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72778 --- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #6) Hi, Uros. Thanks for reporting this. It was my mistake that I did not check bootstrap with GO. I am going to fix it soon. > Before the patch, register allocato

[Bug middle-end/72795] Missed optimization of external-linkage variables in presence of barriers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72795 Peter Cordes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter at cordes dot ca --- Comment #1 fro

[Bug middle-end/72795] Missed optimization of external-linkage variables in presence of barriers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72795 --- Comment #2 from Ahmad Fatoum --- The write that can't be optimized away is the final assignment to x. The `movl$1, x(%rip)` prior to the barrier should've been optimized out, IMO.

[Bug rtl-optimization/72778] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.c:451

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72778 --- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Wed Aug 3 18:54:49 2016 New Revision: 239091 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239091&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-08-03 Vladimir Makarov PR middle-end/72778

[Bug middle-end/71876] longjmp is miscompiled with -ffreestanding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71876 --- Comment #14 from Bernd Edlinger --- Author: edlinger Date: Wed Aug 3 19:05:45 2016 New Revision: 239092 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239092&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-08-03 Bernd Edlinger PR middle-end/71876 * c

[Bug gcov-profile/69004] Building t-engine on ARM fails during -fprofile-use stage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69004 --- Comment #23 from PeteVine --- > updating URL to latest 1.4.8 version. Can you please check that the problem > is still reproducible? Thanks, forgot to mention my last reproduction used 1.4.6 source.

[Bug c++/72796] [7 Regression] Firefox build error: use of deleted function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72796 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/72796] [7 Regression] Firefox build error: use of deleted function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72796 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug middle-end/72795] Missed optimization of external-linkage variables in presence of barriers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72795 --- Comment #3 from Peter Cordes --- Based on further discussion (http://chat.stackoverflow.com/rooms/119045/discussion-between-a3f-and-peter-cordes), the only bug (or feature?) here is that asm("":::"memory") doesn't count as a reference for `y`

[Bug web/60933] Please do not advertise outdated version of gmp, mpfr, mpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60933 --- Comment #15 from Leif Leonhardy --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14) > Fixed. In trunk that is. In GCC 6.1.0 we still have $ egrep -iw 'gmp|mpfr|mpc' src/gcc-6.1.0/contrib/download_prerequisites MPFR=mpfr-2.4.2 GMP=gmp-4.3.2

[Bug fortran/72798] New: Module (.mod) file changes even when interface does not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72798 Bug ID: 72798 Summary: Module (.mod) file changes even when interface does not Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c++/72796] [7 Regression] Firefox build error: use of deleted function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72796 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/72799] New: [C++11] ref-qualifiers are dropped from some function types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72799 Bug ID: 72799 Summary: [C++11] ref-qualifiers are dropped from some function types Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

<    1   2   3   4   5   >