https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65033
--- Comment #11 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> --- On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, torvald at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > The difference is unfortunate, but C11 specifies that atomic_is_lock_free is > *per object*. I suppose that any change there would have to go through the > ISO > C process. See DR#465 <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2059.htm#dr_465>.
