https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787
--- Comment #5 from martin <ranjan.winner at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4) > On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, ranjan.winner at gmail dot com wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787 > > > > --- Comment #2 from martin <ranjan.winner at gmail dot com> --- > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > > > You can't rely on __builtin_object_size this way, please look up its > > > documentation. > > > > Hi Richard, > > Sorry, can you kindly throw some more pointers over this. > > Here is the link for gcc document on object-size-Checking: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Object-Size-Checking.html > > > > > > Also some pointer over my Query:- > > > > Why for gcc-4.6 changes with tree-ssa.c file are omitted but not in gcc-4.7 > > branch > > Because the change is intrusive and not strictly required. Thanks:)
