http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59734
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59724
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> > Created attachment 31778 [details]
> > gcc49-pr59724.patch
>
> Thanks, I have started native bootstrap (+ regtests) on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59576
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59715
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 9 09:21:02 2014
New Revision: 206460
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206460&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-09 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/59715
* tree-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Created attachment 31760 [details]
> list_io.diff
>
> The attached patch fixes the code in comment #1. I'm currently
> doing the regtest.
The patch fixes the problem (at least integer and real) with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59715
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58555
--- Comment #15 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #14)
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #13)
> > I see, we should just short citcuit case when caller_freq
> > is 0. I will test patch.
>
> Any news with the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59387
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Unfortunately it triggers (sccp no longer optimizes) on quite a few
> testcases:
>
> gcc.c-torture/execute/pr58277-1.c
> gcc.c-torture/execute/pr58831.c
> gcc.c-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59735
Bug ID: 59735
Summary: code coverage options generate corrupted gcno file
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59734
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59731
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59733
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59732
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #9)
> Hi,
> this patch solves the testcase.
> The first hunk gets rid of the redundant NOP_EXPR converting TRUTH_EXPR from
> INT to BOOL. The second improves gimplifier
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59725
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
Summary|[4.9 Regression
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59723
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56779
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Could the submitter and/or Daniel please provide the complete configure command
used to build GCC (e.g. from the output of 'gcc -v', this is supposed to be
part of any bug report, see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56779
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to treeve from comment #0)
>
> when gcc is built without gettext support, but gettext-
This was truncated, could the submitter also please clarify what was meant?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59385
--- Comment #6 from Julian Taylor ---
shouldn't -ffast-math enable -ffp-contract=fast?
also gcc 4.9 still documents -ffp-contract=fast as being the default while it
is apparently not anymore.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58026
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57042
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59736
Bug ID: 59736
Summary: ice with -O3 in cgraph_edge_brings_value_p
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59736
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #99 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 9 11:52:43 2014
New Revision: 206461
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206461&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-09 Richard Biener
PR lto/45586
* lto.c (hash_canonic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59737
Bug ID: 59737
Summary: ice from optimize_inline_calls
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59675
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Seems obviously correct, I don't know/remember if there was a reason stdout was
used
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59738
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59738
Bug ID: 59738
Summary: [4.9 Regression] r206444 caused FAIL:
23_containers/vector/52591.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abensonca at gmail dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59336
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2014-1-9
--- Comment #4 from Joost V
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59430
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
> This should be fixed now.
Indeed, works fine everywhere.
Thanks.
Rainer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59433
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
> Should be fixed now.
I'm seeing a massive improvement, but now some 32-bit tests that used to
work before are failing:
Running target unix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59736
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58764
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59738
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56779
--- Comment #11 from Dâniel Fraga ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
> Could the submitter and/or Daniel please provide the complete configure
> command used to build GCC (e.g. from the output of 'gcc -v', this is
> supposed to be p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59737
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka ---
> > case INTEGER_TYPE: case ENUMERAL_TYPE: case BOOLEAN_TYPE:
> > case OFFSET_TYPE:
> > + if (TREE_CODE (arg) == TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR)
> > + return fold_build2_loc (loc, TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR, type, TREE_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59631
--- Comment #4 from bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: bviyer
Date: Thu Jan 9 13:37:41 2014
New Revision: 206463
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206463&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix for PR c++/59631.
+++ gcc/cp/ChangeLog
+2014-01-09 Balaji V
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58026
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #7)
> > For the record: The code that I'm proposing to remove in comment 4 has been
> > added by Paul in r105913:
>
> For PR24158 (ice-on-invalid-code), which
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59695
mgretton at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mgretton at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58026
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |
Summary|[4.9 Regres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59737
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58026
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Further reduced test case for the error recovery:
type sysmtx_t
type(ext_complex_t), allocatable :: S(:)
end type
end
Trunk (and 4.4 - 4.8) yield:
c3.f90:3.40:
type(ext_complex_t), all
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59433
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
It seems this is a 32-bit issue: the failure is very fragile to
reproduce: I easily get it if running manually or under gdb, but it
vanishes if run under truss. Adding assertions in runti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE|[4.8 Regression] ICE
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59738
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
On x86_64-apple-darwin13 the error is
In file included from
/opt/gcc/build_w/x86_64-apple-darwin13.0.0/i386/libstdc++-v3/include/vector:62:0,
from
/opt/gcc/work/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/
#1 from Marek Polacek ---
I can't reproduce it with xg++ (GCC) 4.9.0 20140109 (experimental) configured
with --enable-checking=yes,rtl.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59190
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
A first step could be to teach alias analysis about BUILT_IN_ATOMIC_*,
currently it thinks i escapes in __atomic_add_fetch_4 (&i._M_i, 1, 5).
Unrelated, but maybe those builtins could also get the nonnull attrib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54300
--- Comment #16 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Thu Jan 9 15:18:55 2014
New Revision: 206466
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206466&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/54300
gcc:
* regcprop.c (copyprop_hardre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59738
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, I think it just needs to be reverted (at least for now).
Francois, unless you have a quick fix can you do that?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 9 15:25:34 2014
New Revision: 206467
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206467&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-09 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2013-11-18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59125
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 9 15:25:34 2014
New Revision: 206467
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206467&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-09 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2013-11-18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59362
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 9 15:25:34 2014
New Revision: 206467
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206467&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-09 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2013-11-18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59125
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59733
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59733
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It doesn't matter which change triggered it, this looks like libsanitizer
internal error, it assumes no internal allocations will need to be large, but
apparently some are. So, the question is what is the bac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:29:42PM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700
>
> --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
> The attached patch fixes t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59524
--- Comment #1 from bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: bviyer
Date: Thu Jan 9 15:41:20 2014
New Revision: 206468
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206468&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix for PR testsuite/59524
2014-01-09 Balaji V. Iyer
+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 09:27:18AM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700
>
> --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > Created attachment 31760 [det
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59524
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59194
--- Comment #10 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> That said, during stage3 I'll look at how costly would be to use there
> __atomic_load_n with MEMMODEL_RELAXED.
any chance this could be looked at in the r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59659
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59465
Viktor Ostashevskyi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostash at ostash dot kiev.ua
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59659
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 31785
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31785&action=edit
patch for the array initialization
Untested patch for the array initialization - if there are several (patch uses
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59739
Bug ID: 59739
Summary: missed optimization: attribute ((pure)) could be
honored more often
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59738
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Maybe like this...
index 3638a8c..2cedd39 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_vector.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_vector.h
@@ -1433,7 +1433,8 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER
voi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59094
--- Comment #4 from bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: bviyer
Date: Thu Jan 9 16:52:23 2014
New Revision: 206469
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206469&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix for PR bootstrap/59094
+2014-01-09 Balaji V. Iyer
+
+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Benson ---
(In reply to janus from comment #10)
> (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9)
> > I don't see the point to keep this PR open in addition of pr54224 (only one
> > issue left AFAIU). Also I don't th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59659
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59659
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For the #c0 testcase, I think reduced testcase is:
struct S { S (); S (int); ~S (); int i; };
struct A { S s[100]; };
void
foo ()
{
A a = {{}};
}
and in that case we don't go through build_vec_init, but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57945
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59645
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59740
Bug ID: 59740
Summary: [C++11] ICE in create_tmp_var
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59048
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Version|4.4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59740
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59659
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> For the #c0 testcase, I think reduced testcase is:
> struct S { S (); S (int); ~S (); int i; };
> struct A { S s[100]; };
>
> void
> foo ()
> {
> A a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59740
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
PR58501 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59713
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think this is a front-end issue, the temporary gets destroyed twice
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59704
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58501
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59740
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58501
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59730
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini ---
Testcase added to mainline.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59094
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59730
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Jan 9 17:45:55 2014
New Revision: 206473
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206473&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-09 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/59730
* g++.dg/cpp0x/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59713
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59713
--- Comment #3 from Victor Robertson ---
I was thinking that might be the case, I'll see if I can move the report to the
appropriate section.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59713
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I wasn't going to change the component until we've definitely ruled out
libstdc++ ... I'll keep looking into it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59136
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 9 18:13:39 2014
New Revision: 206475
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206475&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/59136
libsanitizer/
* sanitizer_common/Makefile.am (AM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59733
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Breakpoint 6, __sanitizer::Report (
format=format@entry=0x2821768 "ERROR: %s failed to allocate 0x%zx (%zd)
bytes of %s: %d\n")
---Type to continue, or q to quit---
at
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc/libsanitiz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58115
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 9 18:25:19 2014
New Revision: 206478
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206478&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/58115
* tree-core.h (struct target_globals): New forward
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56572
--- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 31787
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31787&action=edit
removal of transactions from clones
This is a patch that fixes part of the problem, but as discussed in the thre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59738
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Jan 9 18:38:52 2014
New Revision: 206480
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206480&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/59738
* include/bits/stl_vector.h (vector<>::_M_move_a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59738
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59741
Bug ID: 59741
Summary: Union with struct with flexible array member output
incorrectly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59226
--- Comment #17 from David Kredba ---
Qtwebkit-4.8.5 compilation not ICEs gcc after your patch applied (it not links
the final library but that is another problem).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59733
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
BTW, are you sure you don't have some ulimit imposed limits (say on virtual
address space)?
Can you strace it (perhaps just strace -o log -e mmap,munmap )?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28865
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
