http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Benson <abensonca at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to janus from comment #10) > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9) > > I don't see the point to keep this PR open in addition of pr54224 (only one > > issue left AFAIU). Also I don't think this is any longer a regression. > > I agree that this PR can probably be closed. > > Except: What happened to the problem of comment 5, i.e. the linking problems > with the FoX library? This is apparently the reason for the 'regression' > tag. I see no follow-ups to this either here or in the mailing list thread. > Has it been fixed? Or was it just false alarm? > > Andrew, can you give as a comment about what happened to the linking problem? This was fixed in PR54884 if I remember correctly.
