http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59659
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, | |jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I think this is somewhat related to e.g.: struct A { A (); A (int); ~A (); }; void bar (A *); #define T10(N) N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N #define T100(N) T10(N), T10(N), T10(N), T10(N), T10(N), \ T10(N), T10(N), T10(N), T10(N), T10(N) #define T1000(N) T100(N), T100(N), T100(N), T100(N), T100(N), \ T100(N), T100(N), T100(N), T100(N), T100(N) #define T10000(N) T1000(N), T1000(N), T1000(N), T1000(N), T1000(N), \ T1000(N), T1000(N), T1000(N), T1000(N), T1000(N) #define T100000(N) T10000(N), T10000(N), T10000(N), T10000(N), T10000(N), \ T10000(N), T10000(N), T10000(N), T10000(N), T10000(N) void foo () { A a[] = { 1, 2, T1000 (3), T10000 (4), T1000 (3), 2, 1 }; bar (a); } also taking long time to compile and generating enormous amount of code (and when replacing T10000 (4) with T100000 (4) it is even much worse).