http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59194
--- Comment #10 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > That said, during stage3 I'll look at how costly would be to use there > __atomic_load_n with MEMMODEL_RELAXED. any chance this could be looked at in the remaining part of stage3? I can benchmark the patch on our application if this makes sense.
