http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46736
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46723
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46730
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488
--- Comment #36 from rguenther at suse dot de
2010-12-01 10:12:21 UTC ---
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488
>
> --- Comment #35 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-30
> 23:25:5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46738
Laurent GUERBY changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28105
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46695
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46742
Summary: -Wparentheses unexpectedly misses some cases
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46743
Summary: gdb Pretty Printers don't work for std::set
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46743
--- Comment #1 from Benjamin Schindler
2010-12-01 12:31:30 UTC ---
Btw, I tried latest svn too and it has the same issues
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46695
--- Comment #4 from Dave Korn 2010-12-01 12:31:28
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
>
> > not I,
> > the addition of -no-undefined was from the Dave K. who needs it to get a
> > .dll
> > to build
> > - without that ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46743
--- Comment #2 from Benjamin Schindler
2010-12-01 12:32:15 UTC ---
Btw, I tried latest svn (pretty printers only) too and it has the same issues
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43628
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bschindler at inf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46743
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46743
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-12-01
12:35:57 UTC ---
the bug is in g++ not the pretty printers, so you need a new gcc from svn, not
just the pretty printers
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46695
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe 2010-12-01 12:42:48
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > (In reply to comment #2)
> >
> > > not I,
> > > the addition of -no-undefined was from the Dave K. who needs it to get a
> > >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46625
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-01
12:47:13 UTC ---
Regarding the mangled symbols: As
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/11b3845e961393bc
shows there is a real-world issue with MinGW64 and static linki
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46744
Summary: Additional "stop after" stage for C cache usage
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46730
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-01
13:13:28 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Dec 1 13:13:23 2010
New Revision: 167326
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167326
Log:
2010-12-01 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46745
Summary: '#'mem_ref' not supported by dump_expr#'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46731
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46734
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46744
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-01
14:00:31 UTC ---
There isn't such point internally, unused typedefs etc. are not removed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46745
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46730
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46732
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-12-01
14:03:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> GCC 4.4 predates that issue being resolved, so the only real workaround is to
> avoid using -std=c++0x with GCC 4.4
Or do something like I did for std::mo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46746
Summary: ICE at find_valid_class, at reload.c:704
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46731
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-12-01
14:18:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> But I would argue that g is bound at first stage name-lookup
> and thus it is not a dependent name and thus the error is correct.
9.3.1p3 says that becaus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46747
Summary: invalid first operand of MEM_REF errors and ICEs with
-fgraphite-identity
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46731
--- Comment #5 from Johannes Schaub 2010-12-01
14:39:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Confirmed. EDG accepts it.
>
> But I would argue that g is bound at first stage name-lookup
> and thus it is not a dependent name and thus the error is c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28105
--- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist 2010-12-01 14:43:55
UTC ---
AFAICS the patch I committed in #6 as r167317 only changes how the ALLOCATE
statement is compiled. For automatic and static arrays, different codepaths are
chosen.
In principle we
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46744
Michael T. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46748
Summary: Error "using typename" in template class
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46723
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|4.6.0 |
Summary|[4.5 Regression] i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46748
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-12-01
15:33:56 UTC ---
another dup of PR 14258 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46723
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-01
15:37:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 22587
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22587
patch
Patch I'm testing. Computes the induction PHI in the type of the evolution,
stripping conv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46745
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |middle-end
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28105
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-01
15:38:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> For automatic and static arrays, different code paths are chosen.
I think one should try to get some checking working for INTEGER_CST_P only,
i.e. independe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14258
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #14 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46748
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
Summary|GCC no longer ge
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marc.glisse at normalesup
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46746
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37440
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-01
16:18:14 UTC ---
*** Bug 46746 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45297
--- Comment #6 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-01 17:25:15
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 1 17:25:10 2010
New Revision: 167348
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167348
Log:
Postpone the rewrite out of SSA to the end of the tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45297
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
/xgcc
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/gcc-4.6-20101201/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/pr41893-1.c
-gdwarf-2 -g1 -flto -fwhole-program -O
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/gcc-4.6-20101201/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/pr41893-2.c
-lm -m32 -o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-01
17:50:25 UTC ---
This failure appeared after r167289 but by r167301.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-01
18:05:00 UTC ---
Caused by...
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 30 10:00:51 2010
New Revision: 167292
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167292
Log:
2010-11-30 Richard Guenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488
--- Comment #38 from Paulo César Pereira de Andrade 2010-12-01 18:23:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #37)
> > If you'd re-use the same type the issue would go away as well (I think).
>
> Yes, this works for the testcase, but probably only because
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488
--- Comment #39 from Paulo César Pereira de Andrade 2010-12-01 18:25:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #38)
> (In reply to comment #37)
> > > If you'd re-use the same type the issue would go away as well (I think).
> >
> > Yes, this works for the t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488
--- Comment #40 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-01
18:55:28 UTC ---
> Maybe this should this be considered a problem in the sense that it
> does not warn with -Wstrict-aliasing ? As in this case, httpd source
> was patched to "correct" the warning,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46750
Summary: Parallel build doesn't work
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto in a gcc+binutils
combined tree
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45297
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46750
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45297
--- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-01
19:10:07 UTC ---
Note that I see these failures with either ppl-0.10.2 and legacy cloog-ppl or
ppl-0.11 and cloog-isl.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46751
Summary: backtrace_symbols wrong when in unexpected_handler
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46751
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2010-12-01
19:18:02 UTC ---
backtrace is part of libc and not GCC.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46751
--- Comment #2 from Erik J Groeneveld 2010-12-01 19:27:26
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> backtrace is part of libc and not GCC.
Thank you, I'll post it there too.
Could it also have to do something with exception handling code in the c++
ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45297
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45297
--- Comment #11 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-01
20:15:29 UTC ---
In this code:
:
q_5 = &MEM[(void *)q_1 + 4294967288B];
:
# q_1 = PHI
if (q_1 != p_2(D))
goto ;
else
goto ;
scev analysis is able to determine that q1 = {q_3, +, -8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46752
Summary: OpenMP - Seg fault for unallocated allocatable array
in firstprivate clause
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-01
20:30:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 22588
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22588
-v for gcc.dg/debug/pr41893-1.c -gdwarf-2 -g1 at r167291
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-01
20:31:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 22589
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22589
-v for gcc.dg/debug/pr41893-1.c -gdwarf-2 -g1 at r167292
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46753
Summary: ICE: OpenMP - in extract_omp_for_data, at
omp-low.c:335
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-01
20:32:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 22590
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22590
diff between -v for gcc.dg/debug/pr41893-1.c -gdwarf-2 -g1 at r167291 and
r167292
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-01
20:35:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> What's the difference of -v output caused by the patch?
The offending lines from the diff of -v output appears to be...
COMPILER_PATH=/Users/howarth/darwin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46667
--- Comment #6 from Joel Sherrill 2010-12-01 20:34:56
UTC ---
Also impacts arm-*-rtems*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46754
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr45297.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassig...@gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-01
20:38:40 UTC ---
Can you also add -Wl,-debug and/or -debug (basically make sure collect2 and
lto-wrapper have verbosity on)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe 2010-12-01 20:46:11
UTC ---
my (quick) reading of this is that
-- the bugfix made by 167292 has caused the source file to be recognized
-- causing dsymutil to fire up
-- and revealing a pre-existing, probably un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38856
Sergei Larin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slarin at codeaurora dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-01
20:49:41 UTC ---
Works for me with -Wl,-debug (which doesn't delete intermediate files).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #11 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-01
20:58:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Works for me with -Wl,-debug (which doesn't delete intermediate files).
On x86_64-apple-darwin10 at r167292, adding -Wl,-debug inhibits the crash in
dsymut
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe 2010-12-01 21:10:51
UTC ---
hm.
on i686-darwin9 - adding -Wl,-debug simply suppresses the recognition of the
source file and dsymutil is not called (a manifestation of PR41751).
So there are two things;
1. dsy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe 2010-12-01 21:20:36
UTC ---
with -save-temps, dsymutil _is_ called and, indeed, the file complained about
is absent.
(I've a hunch that this could be related to the changes for simple-obj).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-01
21:23:55 UTC ---
Also works with splitting the command into a -c and a link step. Thus,
/Users/richard/obj/gcc/xgcc -B/Users/richard/obj/gcc/
/Users/richard/src/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46752
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp, wrong-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe 2010-12-01 21:34:19
UTC ---
splitting the command into compile and link steps will intentionally remove the
dsymutil step - thus making the problem 'go away' ...
dsymutil should _only_ be called if there is a so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45297
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46754
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de
2010-12-01 21:51:18 UTC ---
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, iains at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
>
> --- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe 2010-12-01
> 21:34:19 UTC -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe 2010-12-01 21:52:33
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> is invocated (it's basically old LTO mode and not WHOPR). darwin doesn't
> seem to have an 'strace' command (bah).
dtruss/dtrace might help.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488
--- Comment #41 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-01
21:53:23 UTC ---
The warning machinery is faced with:
(struct apr_bucket *) &a->list.next
It doesn't warn because, although &a->list has a different type than struct
apr_bucket, its field 'next' h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #18 from Iain Sandoe 2010-12-01 22:06:23
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, iains at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
> >
> > --- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe 2010-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488
--- Comment #42 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-01
22:14:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #41)
> The warning machinery is faced with:
>
> (struct apr_bucket *) &a->list.next
>
> It doesn't warn because, although &a->list has a different type tha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46755
Summary: ICE: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:395 with -O
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46755
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #1 from Zden
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46756
Summary: -fcompare-debug failure (length) with ASSIGN
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46755
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46756
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-12-01 23:11:44
UTC ---
Created attachment 22593
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22593
another testcase (from pr9258.f)
This one is shorter, but needs -fexpensive-optimizations
$ gcc -O -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46757
Summary: bootstrap failure under Fedora 13 and 14
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46757
--- Comment #1 from rwgk at yahoo dot com 2010-12-01 23:44:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 22595
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22595
output of make bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46757
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka 2010-12-01
23:58:30 UTC ---
I am just trying to get Mozilla building with GNU ld instead of gold. First
problem is that Mozilla links some of libraries as:
/abuild/jh/trunk-install/bin/gcc -O3 -flto -flto-parti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46734
--- Comment #2 from Ryan Hill 2010-12-02 00:29:26
UTC ---
Created attachment 22596
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22596
testcase-mini.i
FWIW, delta eventually spit this out.
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
