http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46695
--- Comment #4 from Dave Korn <davek at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-01 12:31:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > not I, > > the addition of -no-undefined was from the Dave K. who needs it to get a > > .dll > > to build > > - without that change, everything is hunky-dory with libtool defaults. > > Based on our off-list discussion, I thought that it actually required an > explicit "-undefined dynamic_lookup"? Ah, hang on, I re-read our earlier emails and think I misunderstood. My understanding now is that that is what you get by default, so simply /not/ passing "-no-undefined" on Darwin is all that is required. That is how I will respin the patch.
