http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46736
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-01
09:27:42 UTC ---
Jason, could you take a look?
Shouldn't a user-provided move constructor still be defined as deleted if
there's a subobject that isn't trivially copyable?
