[Bug libstdc++/56468] Clang exposes bug with unexpected forward-declaration of type_info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56468 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/56455] [4.8 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56455 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/56455] [4.8 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56455 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-27 07:27:02 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 27 07:26:53 2013 New Revision: 196304 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196304 Log: PR target/56455 * stmt.c (expan

[Bug driver/56469] New: The .gcno file being generated is not cleaned up after gcc exits with an error.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56469 Bug #: 56469 Summary: The .gcno file being generated is not cleaned up after gcc exits with an error. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status

[Bug libstdc++/56012] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] Narrowing conversion in atomic_flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56012 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/56011] [C++11] std::atomic and std::atomic_bool miss volatile assignment operator overload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56011 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/56011] [C++11] std::atomic and std::atomic_bool miss volatile assignment operator overload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56011 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-27 00:57:45 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Wed Feb 27 00:57:36 2013 New Revision: 196301 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196301 Log: PR libstdc++/56012 * include/b

[Bug libstdc++/56012] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] Narrowing conversion in atomic_flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56012 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-27 00:57:43 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Wed Feb 27 00:57:36 2013 New Revision: 196301 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196301 Log: PR libstdc++/56012 * include/b

[Bug libstdc++/56011] [C++11] std::atomic and std::atomic_bool miss volatile assignment operator overload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56011 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-26 23:46:31 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Tue Feb 26 23:46:21 2013 New Revision: 196296 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196296 Log: PR libstdc++/56012 * include/b

[Bug libstdc++/56012] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] Narrowing conversion in atomic_flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56012 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-26 23:46:29 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Tue Feb 26 23:46:21 2013 New Revision: 196296 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196296 Log: PR libstdc++/56012 * include/b

[Bug libstdc++/56468] Clang exposes bug with unexpected forward-declaration of type_info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56468 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgcc/56460] _Unwind_Find_FDE is O(n) in the number of frame infos, (and LLVM's JIT will generate many of them)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56460 --- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher 2013-02-26 22:57:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > - Why qsort the whole array, instead of e.g. memmove'ing the bits Ah, oops. qsort can't be used in libgcc, the target may not provide a qsort i

[Bug libstdc++/56468] New: Clang exposes bug with unexpected forward-declaration of type_info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56468 Bug #: 56468 Summary: Clang exposes bug with unexpected forward-declaration of type_info Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UN

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-26 21:13:36 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Feb 26 21:13:27 2013 New Revision: 196294 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196294 Log: PR middle-end/56461 * lra-spill

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov 2013-02-26 20:45:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Created attachment 29544 [details] > gcc48-pr56461-2.patch > Sorry, I should have checked on leaks when I submitted LRA first time. The patch

[Bug fortran/51487] leak memory with eoshift(..,...,boundary)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51487 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/52748] [C++11] N3276 changes to decltype

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/50537] explicit interface required (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50537 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50190] linkpk bench of polyhedron fails during validation with gcc trunk when it is compiled with -Ofast on amd64.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50190 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-02-26 19:23:14 UTC --- On a Core2Duo with '-Ofast' I get 2.51200998D+01 and with '-fprotect-parens -Ofast' 2.50952975D+01. I think the tolerance value for linpk does not make sense: the targe

[Bug c/56463] infinite loop when having integer overflow in a simple accumulator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56463 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-02-26 18:41:56 UTC --- > The compiler may assume that undefined behavior doesn't happen in the program. > It is fine to have undefined behavior in code that will be never executed, but > as soo

[Bug middle-end/56344] ICE for program with very large structs returned by value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56344 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug c++/55582] [C++11] Unable to define string user-defined literal without leading underscore.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55582 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|jaso

[Bug libgcc/56460] _Unwind_Find_FDE is O(n) in the number of frame infos, (and LLVM's JIT will generate many of them)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56460 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/56341] GCC produces unaligned data access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29506|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c/56467] gcc fails to link binaries with unknown reference complaint

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56467 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/56466] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1629 (loop with header n not in loop tree !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56466 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek 2013-02-26 18:15:28 UTC --- Unsurprisingly started with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=195880, but must have been latent before.

[Bug c/56467] New: gcc fails to link binaries with unknown reference complaint

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56467 Bug #: 56467 Summary: gcc fails to link binaries with unknown reference complaint Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/56358] [C++11] Erroneous interaction of typedef and inherited constructor declarations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56358 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lucdanton at free dot fr --- Co

[Bug c++/56452] [C++11] Using declaration for inheriting constructors taints template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56452 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/56466] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1629 (loop with header n not in loop tree !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56466 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Ma

[Bug tree-optimization/56466] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1629 (loop with header n not in loop tree !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56466 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/56463] infinite loop when having integer overflow in a simple accumulator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56463 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-26 17:53:43 UTC --- The compiler may assume that undefined behavior doesn't happen in the program. It is fine to have undefined behavior in code that will be never executed, but as soon as you hit

[Bug target/56441] [ARM Thumb] generated asm code produces "branch out of range" error in gas with -O1 -mcpu=cortex-m3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56441 --- Comment #11 from gnugcc at emblocks dot org 2013-02-26 17:51:16 UTC --- Richard, you can close this one. I'm leaving the ARM-branch and are moving to the head of branch 4.7. Sorry for the inconveniences, I thought that the ARM branch

[Bug tree-optimization/56448] [4.8 Regression] cc1 hangs on volatile array with -O or above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56448 --- Comment #5 from Dara Hazeghi 2013-02-26 17:47:04 UTC --- Thanks! That was a very quick fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/56466] New: ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1629 (loop with header n not in loop tree !)

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: antoine.balest...@gmail.com Using GCC 4.8.0 as of 20130226 : $ cat peel.c int a, b, c; void f(void) { for(; b; b

[Bug c/56463] infinite loop when having integer overflow in a simple accumulator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56463 --- Comment #2 from Cristóbal Camarero 2013-02-26 17:39:31 UTC --- I think that at least -Wall -Wextra -Wstrict-overflow=5 should give a giving notice of the extremely odd behaviour. However, I am not following your reasoning to invalidate the

[Bug target/56441] [ARM Thumb] generated asm code produces "branch out of range" error in gas with -O1 -mcpu=cortex-m3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56441 --- Comment #10 from gnugcc at emblocks dot org 2013-02-26 17:24:52 UTC --- The ARM branch, sorry I see now that the trunk is different. Arm branch: ;; The r/r/k alternative is required when reloading the address ;; (plus (reg rN) (r

[Bug c/56465] Strange warning about variable modified range

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56465 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2013-02-26 17:23:21 UTC --- >it is actual a constant. I don't think it is a integer constant expression though as it contains a cast from a pointer type to an integer type.

[Bug c/56465] New: Strange warning about variable modified range

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56465 Bug #: 56465 Summary: Strange warning about variable modified range Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug target/56441] [ARM Thumb] generated asm code produces "branch out of range" error in gas with -O1 -mcpu=cortex-m3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56441 --- Comment #9 from Richard Earnshaw 2013-02-26 17:03:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > I was looking completely wrong, the arm_addsi3 is acting wrong. > > The "add%?\\t%0, %1, %2" for "=l,%0,Py" is set at a length of 2. > (first e

[Bug target/56441] [ARM Thumb] generated asm code produces "branch out of range" error in gas with -O1 -mcpu=cortex-m3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56441 --- Comment #8 from Richard Earnshaw 2013-02-26 17:01:36 UTC --- Please use an open (non-proprietory) file format for attaching files. I don't have access to RAR format.

[Bug c++/56464] Crashes when using implicit this in a lambda capture in member initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56464 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-26 16:32:18 UTC --- Created attachment 29544 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29544 gcc48-pr56461-2.patch Another leak fix, this time in lra. ==31825== 161,960 bytes in 32

[Bug c++/56462] Simple use of auto in template function causes internal error in type_unification_real

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56462 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Known t

[Bug c++/56464] Crashes when using implicit this in a lambda capture in member initilizer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56464 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/56464] New: Crashes when using implicit this in a lambda capture in member initilizer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56464 Bug #: 56464 Summary: Crashes when using implicit this in a lambda capture in member initilizer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Sta

[Bug c/56463] infinite loop when having integer overflow in a simple accumulator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56463 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/56463] New: infinite loop when having integer overflow in a simple accumulator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56463 Bug #: 56463 Summary: infinite loop when having integer overflow in a simple accumulator Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UN

[Bug c++/56462] New: Simple use of auto in template function causes internal error in type_unification_real

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56462 Bug #: 56462 Summary: Simple use of auto in template function causes internal error in type_unification_real Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1

[Bug fortran/48890] length of a character derived-type component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48890 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-26 16:00:32 UTC --- Created attachment 29543 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29543 incpath.c leak fixes Another place which leaks memory all the time is incpath.c. Untested

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-26 15:58:34 UTC --- Created attachment 29542 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29542 opts* memory leak fixes Another thing, something that bothered me for a while and clutters

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org Ta

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-26 15:53:22 UTC --- Created attachment 29541 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29541 gcc48-pr56461.patch The biggest leak there is: ==31825== 1,491,200 bytes in 11,650 blocks

[Bug middle-end/56461] New: [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 Bug #: 56461 Summary: [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/56061] [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug rtl-optimization/55092] [4.8 Regression] LRA aggravates var-tracking scalability problems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55092 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #7 from Ri

[Bug debug/55056] [4.8 Regression] -O0 -g missing location for register double var

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55056 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #8 from Ri

[Bug target/47333] [4.6/4.8 regression] g++.dg/lto/20091219 FAILs on Solaris 2 with SUN as

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/56453] Gcc segmentation fault building argz_add.c for xcompiler newlib for fr30-elf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56453 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/56453] Gcc segmentation fault building argz_add.c for xcompiler newlib for fr30-elf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56453 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton 2013-02-26 14:58:34 UTC --- Author: nickc Date: Tue Feb 26 14:58:17 2013 New Revision: 196292 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196292 Log: PR target/56453 Import this patc

[Bug target/54662] Wrong warning flags for building mep-pragma.o, fails to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54662 --- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2013-02-26 14:55:37 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Tue Feb 26 14:55:31 2013 New Revision: 196291 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196291 Log: PR target/54662

[Bug target/54640] arm_adjust_block_mem: signed/unsigned comparison

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54640 --- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2013-02-26 14:51:46 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Tue Feb 26 14:51:36 2013 New Revision: 196290 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196290 Log: PR target/54640

[Bug libgcc/56460] _Unwind_Find_FDE is O(n) in the number of frame infos, (and LLVM's JIT will generate many of them)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56460 --- Comment #1 from Chris Reed 2013-02-26 14:43:15 UTC --- Created attachment 29540 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29540 Proposed fix - maintain array, binary search it

[Bug libgcc/56460] New: _Unwind_Find_FDE is O(n) in the number of frame infos, (and LLVM's JIT will generate many of them)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56460 Bug #: 56460 Summary: _Unwind_Find_FDE is O(n) in the number of frame infos, (and LLVM's JIT will generate many of them) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Versio

[Bug fortran/55758] LOGICAL and BIND(C): Reject kind=2/4/8/16 with -std=f2008, improve warning, switch to nonBOOLEAN_TYPE for those

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55758 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug target/54639] mn10300_expand_epilogue: signed / unsigned comparison

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54639 --- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2013-02-26 14:39:24 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Tue Feb 26 14:39:15 2013 New Revision: 196289 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196289 Log: PR target/54639

[Bug target/52550] tile*.c: unused variable ‘cfa_offset’

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52550 --- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2013-02-26 14:34:34 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Tue Feb 26 14:34:26 2013 New Revision: 196288 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196288 Log: PR target/52550

[Bug target/52501] cr16-protos.h uses enum rtx_code outside #ifdef RTX_CODE guard

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52501 --- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2013-02-26 14:30:27 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Tue Feb 26 14:30:17 2013 New Revision: 196287 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196287 Log: PR target/52501

[Bug target/52500] dwarf2cfi.c fails to build with -Werror for c6x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52500 --- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2013-02-26 14:24:22 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Tue Feb 26 14:24:17 2013 New Revision: 196286 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196286 Log: PR target/52500

[Bug bootstrap/53798] [4.7] Bootstrap fails on Linux x86_64 with pre-built libmpc/mpfr/gmp due to multilib path problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53798 Martin changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.7.1 |4.7.2 Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/56459] New: Wrongly rejects "TYPE(CHARACTER*1,)" (with comma)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56459 Bug #: 56459 Summary: Wrongly rejects "TYPE(CHARACTER*1,)" (with comma) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: reject

[Bug target/48901] lm32.md: ashlsi3: error: unused variable ‘one’

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48901 --- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2013-02-26 14:19:32 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Tue Feb 26 14:19:24 2013 New Revision: 196285 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196285 Log: PR target/48901

[Bug libitm/53113] Build fails in x86_avx.cc if AVX disabled but supported by as (Solaris & Linux)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53113 --- Comment #10 from Martin 2013-02-26 14:18:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) In fact I [suppose I] do as you suggest: I use "-march=core2" to prevent it from using AVX. The problem is that this is inconsistently overruled by the cap

[Bug c++/55632] trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c:10614: strange line of code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55632 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/55632] trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c:10614: strange line of code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55632 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-26 14:04:59 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Feb 26 14:04:47 2013 New Revision: 196284 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196284 Log: 2013-02-26 David Binderman

[Bug c++/56419] [4.8 regression] transactions in for-loops disappear

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56419 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/56419] [4.8 regression] transactions in for-loops disappear

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56419 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-02-26 12:40:36 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Tue Feb 26 12:40:27 2013 New Revision: 196282 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196282 Log: PR c++/56419 * semantics.c (be

[Bug target/54661] mcore_output_movedouble: operation on ‘memexp’ may be undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54661 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug target/54660] iq2000_function_arg_advance: format ‘%p expects argument of type ‘void*’, but argument 3 has type ‘const_tree

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54660 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug target/56455] [4.8 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56455 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/52495] rs6000.c fails to (cross-) build: "implicit declaration of function ‘ASM_WEAKEN_DECL’"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52495 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug target/47100] No prototype for ‘vxworks_override_options'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47100 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug c/56458] support for crash on invalid array access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56458 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c/56458] New: support for crash on invalid array access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56458 Bug #: 56458 Summary: support for crash on invalid array access Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/18374] [meta-bug] Argument and return value marshalling at tree level

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18374 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener 2013-02-26 11:33:15 UTC --- On the other hand we do have a mismatch between caller and callee, for C at least: short barshort (short a) { return a; } short foo1short (short a) { return barshor

[Bug target/54657] darwin-c.c:278:27: error: invalid conversion from ‘const char*’ to ‘char*’

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54657 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug sanitizer/56454] need to rename attribute no_address_safety_analysis to no_sanitize_address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56454 --- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-02-26 11:19:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > Clang accepts the old name silently. > I am not sure about "forever", > clang will probably start printing a "deprecated" warning at some point. W

[Bug target/47107] ix86-netware is recognized by config.guess, but has no valid basic_machine set

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47107 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug tree-optimization/56426] [4.8 Regression] Segmentation fault in find_var_scev_info, at tree-scalar-evolution.c:358

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56426 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/56426] [4.8 Regression] Segmentation fault in find_var_scev_info, at tree-scalar-evolution.c:358

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56426 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek 2013-02-26 11:06:28 UTC --- Author: mpolacek Date: Tue Feb 26 11:06:14 2013 New Revision: 196281 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196281 Log: 2013-02-26 Marek Polacek

[Bug target/47091] non-elf arm targets fail to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47091 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug target/56444] mn10300.c:3228:16: error: unused variable ‘loops’

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56444 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/56444] mn10300.c:3228:16: error: unused variable ‘loops’

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56444 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2013-02-26 10:49:30 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Feb 26 10:49:25 2013 New Revision: 196280 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196280 Log: 2013-02-26 Richard Biener P

[Bug target/26546] missed optimization with respect of vector intrinsics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26546 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|meta-bug| Target|

[Bug target/52928] Alpha/VMS: c++ triggers gas errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52928 --- Comment #3 from Tristan Gingold 2013-02-26 10:38:40 UTC --- On Feb 26, 2013, at 11:27 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52928 > > --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener 2013-02-26

[Bug tree-optimization/56457] New: Bogus warning: loop-invariant.c:786:20: error: unused variable ‘regno’ when building vax-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56457 Bug #: 56457 Summary: Bogus warning: loop-invariant.c:786:20: error: unused variable ‘regno’ when building vax-*-* Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug c++/55632] trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c:10614: strange line of code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55632 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/56443] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed at -O[1-2] -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56443 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/56443] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed at -O[1-2] -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56443 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-26 10:29:58 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Feb 26 10:29:47 2013 New Revision: 196279 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196279 Log: PR tree-optimization/56443 * tr

  1   2   >