http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55092
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-26
15:15:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I believe on that testcase it was because without LRA the function didn't use
> a
> frame pointer, while with LRA for some reason it does.
Can we make this bug a dup or is this now about IRA vs. LRA and the frame
pointer issue?
