[Bug testsuite/51059] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-14.c (test for excess errors) on powerpc-apple-darwin9

2011-11-09 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51059 --- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell 2011-11-10 07:38:26 UTC --- There's something strange about the semantics of weak & inline on darwin (or a bug in the darwin linker?). Here's the bits of the testcase: extern int __attribute__ ((weak)) Foo ();

[Bug fortran/51055] deferred length character allocation: allocate(character(len=i)::s) rejected

2011-11-09 Thread jpr at csc dot fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51055 --- Comment #2 from jpr at csc dot fi 2011-11-10 06:09:07 UTC --- OK, i found and lost the PR that included this. However, your workaround doesn't seem to work either: program a character(len=:),allocatable::s integer::j=2 s=repeat(' ',j) pri

[Bug fortran/51073] New: _gfortran_caf_register incorrectly assumes malloc(0) returns non-NULL

2011-11-09 Thread joel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51073 Bug #: 51073 Summary: _gfortran_caf_register incorrectly assumes malloc(0) returns non-NULL Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/50837] [c++0x] static_assert and constexpr in template class

2011-11-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50837 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50837] [c++0x] static_assert and constexpr in template class

2011-11-09 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50837 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-10 02:27:20 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Nov 10 02:27:16 2011 New Revision: 181248 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181248 Log: /cp 2011-11-09 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug bootstrap/51031] build error in libitm (how to disable trans-mem???)

2011-11-09 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/darwin_objdir/./gcc/specs COLLECT_GCC=/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/darwin_objdir/./gcc/xgcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/darwin_objdir/./gcc/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-apple-darwin11.2.0 Configured with: ../gcc-4.7-2009/configure --prefix=/sw

[Bug bootstrap/51031] build error in libitm (how to disable trans-mem???)

2011-11-09 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51031 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/51031] build error in libitm (how to disable trans-mem???)

2011-11-09 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/gcc-4.7-2009/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ > -I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/gcc-4.7-2009/libstdc++-v3/include/backward > -I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/gcc-4.7-2009/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util > -L/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwi

[Bug bootstrap/51031] build error in libitm (how to disable trans-mem???)

2011-11-09 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
-2009/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/gcc-4.7-2009/libstdc++-v3/include/backward -I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/gcc-4.7-2009/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util -L/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin11.2.0/libstdc++-v3/src -L/sw/src

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2011-11-09 Thread inform at tiker dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #17 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-11-10 00:12:58 UTC --- Done. Andreas

[Bug preprocessor/51067] cpp.texi Line Control node not mentioning #, trailing integers

2011-11-09 Thread karl at freefriends dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51067 --- Comment #3 from karl at freefriends dot org 2011-11-09 23:10:09 UTC --- > See "Preprocessor Output" in cpp.texi. Thanks much. That's all the information, for sure. Glad to see it. may I suggest an xref in Line Control?

[Bug c++/50973] [C++0x] internal compiler error defaulted destructor virtual inheritance

2011-11-09 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50973 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/51006] bootstrap fails on NetBSD 5.1

2011-11-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51006 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-09 22:32:26 UTC --- --disable-libitm is also needed to bootstrap on netbsd

[Bug c++/51046] [C++0x] ICE by unexpanded template param pack in range-based for

2011-11-09 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51046 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/50972] [C++0x] ICE on undeclared identifier

2011-11-09 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50972 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/50972] [C++0x] ICE on undeclared identifier

2011-11-09 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50972 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-09 22:25:33 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Nov 9 22:25:25 2011 New Revision: 181240 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181240 Log: PR c++/50972 * pt.c (maybe_instantiate_noex

[Bug c++/51046] [C++0x] ICE by unexpanded template param pack in range-based for

2011-11-09 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51046 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-09 22:25:21 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Nov 9 22:25:12 2011 New Revision: 181239 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181239 Log: PR c++/51046 * parser.c (cp_parser_range_fo

[Bug bootstrap/51072] Build with --disable-bootstrap fails in libitm

2011-11-09 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug libfortran/36755] Avoid fork/exec in chmod intrinsic

2011-11-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36755 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug bootstrap/51072] Build with --disable-bootstrap fails in libitm

2011-11-09 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|bg |Build with |

[Bug c++/50976] [C++0x] literal operator with unsigned long long parameter not accepted

2011-11-09 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50976 --- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-09 21:53:19 UTC --- I like the approach of #2, but it looks like that patch doesn't limit raw operators to char*, but allows other character types as well.

[Bug bootstrap/51072] New: bg

2011-11-09 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072 Bug #: 51072 Summary: bg Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug target/50911] [4.7 regression] assertion failure in expand_vec_perm_interleave2 with -msse

2011-11-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50911 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/51071] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in gimple_has_side_effects, at gimple.c:2513

2011-11-09 Thread belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51071 Bug #: 51071 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in gimple_has_side_effects, at gimple.c:2513 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/50911] [4.7 regression] assertion failure in expand_vec_perm_interleave2 with -msse

2011-11-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50911 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-11-09 21:37:31 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 9 21:37:27 2011 New Revision: 181238 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181238 Log: PR target/50911 * config/i386/i386.c (expan

[Bug bootstrap/51031] build error in libitm (how to disable trans-mem???)

2011-11-09 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51031 --- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth 2011-11-09 21:26:40 UTC --- Looking at llvm, when pushsection and popsection support was added, it is only part of the ELFAsmParser... http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20110214/116525.

[Bug bootstrap/51031] build error in libitm (how to disable trans-mem???)

2011-11-09 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
-2009/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/gcc-4.7-2009/libstdc++-v3/include/backward -I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/gcc-4.7-2009/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util -L/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin11.2.0/libstdc++-v3/src -L/sw/src/fink.build

[Bug target/50493] ICE in neon_disambiguate_copy, at config/arm/arm.c:20388

2011-11-09 Thread michael.hope at linaro dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50493 Michael Hope changed: What|Removed |Added CC||michael.hope at linaro dot

[Bug c/51070] New: ICE verify_gimple failed

2011-11-09 Thread regehr at cs dot utah.edu
: posix gcc version 4.7.0 2009 (experimental) (GCC) [regehr@gamow tmp057]$ current-gcc -Ofast -c -w small.c small.c: In function 'func_9': small.c:24:1: error: invalid PHI argument .MEM_3 small.c:24:1: error: incompatible types in PHI argument 0 int void g_95_I_lsm.15_29 = PHI

[Bug c/51069] New: ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1559

2011-11-09 Thread regehr at cs dot utah.edu
-languages=c,c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 2009 (experimental) (GCC) [regehr@gamow tmp056]$ current-gcc -Ofast -funroll-loops -c -w small.c small.c: In function 'func_44': small.c:73:1: error: edge from 10 to 12 should be marked irreducible small.c:73:1: error: basic block 12

[Bug rtl-optimization/50762] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2137 (unrecognizable insn)

2011-11-09 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50762 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com --- Comment #9 fro

[Bug c++/50976] [C++0x] literal operator with unsigned long long parameter not accepted

2011-11-09 Thread 3dw4rd at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50976 --- Comment #15 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> 2011-11-09 20:23:19 UTC --- Created attachment 25775 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25775 Potential patch #2 A different choice. If I find a string, explicitl

[Bug c++/50976] [C++0x] literal operator with unsigned long long parameter not accepted

2011-11-09 Thread 3dw4rd at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50976 --- Comment #14 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> 2011-11-09 20:21:46 UTC --- Created attachment 25774 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25774 Potential patch #1 I'll regtest this trivial patch when I get home.

[Bug bootstrap/51068] New: 4.7 Regression] ARM bootstrap failure due to ICE in rtl_verify_flow_info_1 at cfgrtl.c:2001

2011-11-09 Thread michael.hope at linaro dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51068 Bug #: 51068 Summary: 4.7 Regression] ARM bootstrap failure due to ICE in rtl_verify_flow_info_1 at cfgrtl.c:2001 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug fortran/46686] Improve backtracing (unwinding) on non-glibc targets

2011-11-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46686 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2011-11-09 20:13:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > I thought that fork, exec, and pipe, which are necessary for starting and > interacting with the addr2line process are not supported on mingw? I just asked

[Bug preprocessor/51067] cpp.texi Line Control node not mentioning #, trailing integers

2011-11-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51067 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-11-09 19:49:05 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.2/cpp/Preprocessor-Output.html#Preprocessor-Output

[Bug preprocessor/51067] cpp.texi Line Control node not mentioning #, trailing integers

2011-11-09 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51067 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-11-09 19:45:32 UTC --- On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, karl at freefriends dot org wrote: > Also, I do not see any description of the trailing integers now sometimes > present in the CPP output, as in:

[Bug fortran/46686] Improve backtracing (unwinding) on non-glibc targets

2011-11-09 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46686 --- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-11-09 19:38:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > TODO: For Windows, one should be able to make use of SymFromAddr + > > SymGetLineFromAddr64 + IMAGEHLP_LINE64 to obtain the sy

[Bug preprocessor/51067] New: cpp.texi Line Control node not mentioning #, trailing integers

2011-11-09 Thread karl at freefriends dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51067 Bug #: 51067 Summary: cpp.texi Line Control node not mentioning #, trailing integers Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/51043] [4.7 Regression]: g++.dg/lto/20100423-3 cp_lto_20100423-3_0.o assemble, -flto -g

2011-11-09 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51043 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/46686] Improve backtracing (unwinding) on non-glibc targets

2011-11-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46686 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2011-11-09 19:26:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > TODO: For Windows, one should be able to make use of SymFromAddr + > SymGetLineFromAddr64 + IMAGEHLP_LINE64 to obtain the symbol name Kai points out that th

[Bug c++/51043] [4.7 Regression]: g++.dg/lto/20100423-3 cp_lto_20100423-3_0.o assemble, -flto -g

2011-11-09 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51043 --- Comment #3 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-11-09 19:25:07 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Wed Nov 9 19:25:01 2011 New Revision: 181231 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181231 Log: PR c++/51043 - ICE in LTO * cp-tree.h (TYPE_A

[Bug c++/51028] [C++0x] Alias-Declaration in namespace omits other whole code

2011-11-09 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51028 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/51046] [C++0x] ICE by unexpanded template param pack in range-based for

2011-11-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51046 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Status|UN

[Bug rtl-optimization/51040] ICE: RTL check: access of elt 1 of 'not' with last elt 0 in gen_rtx_fmt_ee_stat, at ./genrtl.h:33 with __atomic_nand_fetch()

2011-11-09 Thread amacleod at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51040 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/50976] [C++0x] literal operator with unsigned long long parameter not accepted

2011-11-09 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50976 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/50762] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2137 (unrecognizable insn)

2011-11-09 Thread uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50762 --- Comment #8 from Ulrich Weigand 2011-11-09 18:52:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Redefining "j" constraint as "define_address_constraint" results in: Yes, it needs to be define_address_constraint. > pr50762.c:48:1: error: unrecognizabl

[Bug testsuite/51057] FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 -O0 execution test on powerpc*-*-*

2011-11-09 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51057 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug rtl-optimization/50762] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2137 (unrecognizable insn)

2011-11-09 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50762 --- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak 2011-11-09 18:38:12 UTC --- Redefining "j" constraint as "define_address_constraint" results in: pr50762.c:48:1: error: unrecognizable insn: (insn 29 28 30 3 (set (reg:DI 0 ax [77]) (zero_extend:DI (const_

[Bug c++/51064] False Positive for -Wparentheses

2011-11-09 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51064 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/51056] [4.7 Regression][OOP] Bogus "Unused module variable '__vtab_domain_Domain_container'"

2011-11-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51056 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-09 18:32:51 UTC --- Possible fix: Index: module.c === --- module.c(revision 181207) +++ module.c(working copy) @@ -4213,7

[Bug rtl-optimization/50762] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2137 (unrecognizable insn)

2011-11-09 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50762 --- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak 2011-11-09 18:30:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > It seems to me (part of) the problem is that the operand constraint is too > generic here: > > (define_insn "*lea_4_zext" > [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "regis

[Bug tree-optimization/51058] [4.7 Regression] ICE: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:1992

2011-11-09 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51058 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC|ira at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'H

[Bug target/50911] [4.7 regression] assertion failure in expand_vec_perm_interleave2 with -msse

2011-11-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50911 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-11-09 18:26:12 UTC --- Created attachment 25772 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25772 gcc47-pr50911.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c++/51029] [C++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE with -std=c++0x

2011-11-09 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51029 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51029] [C++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE with -std=c++0x

2011-11-09 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51029 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-09 18:13:16 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Nov 9 18:13:09 2011 New Revision: 181225 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181225 Log: PR c++/51029 * class.c (build_base_path): D

[Bug libfortran/47972] error.c:158:7: warning: return makes pointer from integer without a cast

2011-11-09 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47972 --- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson 2011-11-09 18:09:45 UTC --- Author: rth Date: Wed Nov 9 18:09:42 2011 New Revision: 181223 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181223 Log: PR libfortran/47972 * runtime/error.c (gf

[Bug c++/51066] New: [C++0x] warning about binding an rvalue-reference to an implicit conversion result

2011-11-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51066 Bug #: 51066 Summary: [C++0x] warning about binding an rvalue-reference to an implicit conversion result Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Stat

[Bug fortran/46686] Improve backtracing (unwinding) on non-glibc targets

2011-11-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46686 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-11-09 17:57:57 UTC --- With addr2line, the output looks like: #5 0x40064C in MAIN__ at test.f90:6 without #5 0x40064C TODO: For Windows, one should be able to make use of SymFromAddr + SymGetLineFromA

[Bug fortran/46686] Improve backtracing (unwinding) on non-glibc targets

2011-11-09 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46686 --- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-11-09 17:52:19 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Wed Nov 9 17:52:11 2011 New Revision: 181217 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181217 Log: PR 46686 Fix incorrect comment. 2011-11-09 Janne B

[Bug fortran/51056] [4.7 Regression][OOP] Bogus "Unused module variable '__vtab_domain_Domain_container'"

2011-11-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51056 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-09 17:45:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Revision 177649 is OK. > Revision 178509 gives the warning. Well, the culprit is surely this one: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revisio

[Bug tree-optimization/51058] [4.7 Regression] ICE: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:1992

2011-11-09 Thread irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51058 --- Comment #4 from Ira Rosen 2011-11-09 17:40:26 UTC --- Thanks. Index: tree-vect-slp.c === --- tree-vect-slp.c (revision 181190) +++ tree-vect-slp.c (working copy) @@ -219

[Bug c++/51043] [4.7 Regression]: g++.dg/lto/20100423-3 cp_lto_20100423-3_0.o assemble, -flto -g

2011-11-09 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51043 --- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-11-09 17:38:59 UTC --- A patch for this was submitted to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01324.html

[Bug preprocessor/51061] Deprecated -I- option causes segfault

2011-11-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51061 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug preprocessor/51061] Deprecated -I- option causes segfault

2011-11-09 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51061 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-09 17:26:42 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Nov 9 17:26:37 2011 New Revision: 181216 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181216 Log: 2011-11-09 Paolo Carlini PR prep

[Bug c++/51047] [C++0x] SFINAE does not handle errors of ambiguous base members

2011-11-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51047 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51045] erroneous zero as null pointer constant warning at delete

2011-11-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51045 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51045] erroneous zero as null pointer constant warning at delete

2011-11-09 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51045 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-09 17:22:25 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Nov 9 17:22:22 2011 New Revision: 181215 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181215 Log: /cp 2011-11-09 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/51045] erroneous zero as null pointer constant warning at delete

2011-11-09 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51045 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-09 17:21:23 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Nov 9 17:21:19 2011 New Revision: 181214 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181214 Log: /cp 2011-11-09 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/51047] [C++0x] SFINAE does not handle errors of ambiguous base members

2011-11-09 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51047 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-09 17:19:15 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Nov 9 17:19:12 2011 New Revision: 181213 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181213 Log: /cp 2011-11-09 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug tree-optimization/51058] [4.7 Regression] ICE: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:1992

2011-11-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51058 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-11-09 17:17:54 UTC --- Or use enum tree_code code = gimple_expr_code (stmt);

[Bug tree-optimization/51058] [4.7 Regression] ICE: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:1992

2011-11-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51058 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-11-09 17:15:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I guess it'd better be > > SUBROUTINE MLIST(MOLsp,PBCx,PBCy,PBCz, X0) > IMPLICIT NONE > INTEGER, PARAMETER :: NM=16384 > INTEGER ::

[Bug tree-optimization/51058] [4.7 Regression] ICE: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:1992

2011-11-09 Thread irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51058 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/51063] gcc does not pass the -Fpathname option unmodified to /usr/bin/ld linker (all Darwin systems)

2011-11-09 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51063 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-11-09 17:05:09 UTC --- This was supposed to have been fixed by: 2011-03-30 Christian Schueler PR driver/48208 * config/c.opt (F): Added 'Driver' to -F option. 2011-02-12

[Bug target/45233] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr44707.c

2011-11-09 Thread mikestump at comcast dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45233 --- Comment #9 from Mike Stump 2011-11-09 17:03:21 UTC --- Ok. Yeah, combine has a habit of removing a complex thing at one point and rebuilding at another point, mainly to shorten the lifetime. Mentally, I guess I was expecting to see code mot

[Bug tree-optimization/51065] New: Forwarding functions can be optimized to aliases

2011-11-09 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51065 Bug #: 51065 Summary: Forwarding functions can be optimized to aliases Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug bootstrap/51031] build error in libitm (how to disable trans-mem???)

2011-11-09 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51031 Jack Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at nitro dot |

[Bug tree-optimization/51000] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in vect_get_store_cost, at tree-vect-stmts.c:923 on powerpc-apple-darwin9

2011-11-09 Thread irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51000 --- Comment #5 from Ira Rosen 2011-11-09 16:24:05 UTC --- Looks good. Thanks.

[Bug tree-optimization/50605] ice in ipa_get_jf_pass_through_result with -O3

2011-11-09 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50605 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/51062] SLP vectorization of dot (inner) product

2011-11-09 Thread irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51062 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com --- Comment #2 from Ir

[Bug fortran/46686] Improve backtracing (unwinding) on non-glibc targets

2011-11-09 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46686 --- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-11-09 16:04:47 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Wed Nov 9 16:04:42 2011 New Revision: 181209 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181209 Log: PR 46686 Implement backtrace with _Unwind_Backtrace

[Bug fortran/50960] [OOP] vtables not marked as constant

2011-11-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50960 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/50960] [OOP] vtables not marked as constant

2011-11-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50960 --- Comment #22 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-09 15:56:57 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Wed Nov 9 15:56:53 2011 New Revision: 181208 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181208 Log: 2011-11-09 Janus Weil PR fortran/

[Bug libfortran/50016] [4.7 Regression] Drastic I/O performance regression on Windows

2011-11-09 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50016 --- Comment #19 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-11-09 15:46:20 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Wed Nov 9 15:46:15 2011 New Revision: 181207 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181207 Log: PR 50016 Slow I/O on MingW due to _commit frontend

[Bug fortran/51056] [4.7 Regression][OOP] Bogus "Unused module variable '__vtab_domain_Domain_container'"

2011-11-09 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51056 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-11-09 15:33:05 UTC --- Revision 177649 is OK. Revision 178509 gives the warning.

[Bug tree-optimization/51000] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in vect_get_store_cost, at tree-vect-stmts.c:923 on powerpc-apple-darwin9

2011-11-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51000 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25768|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/51052] [OOP] Internal compiler error in gfc_conv_component

2011-11-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51052 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-09 15:20:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > yes, that is the one :). I am really examining the borders of > gfortran at the moment. Right. Thanks for your continued bug reporting. That sort o

[Bug driver/51063] gcc does not pass the -Fpathname option unmodified to /usr/bin/ld linker (all Darwin systems)

2011-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51063 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/51061] Deprecated -I- option causes segfault

2011-11-09 Thread rmansfield at qnx dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51061 --- Comment #3 from Ryan Mansfield 2011-11-09 15:10:59 UTC --- Yes, the patch fixes the crash. Thanks.

[Bug fortran/51056] [4.7 Regression][OOP] Bogus "Unused module variable '__vtab_domain_Domain_container'"

2011-11-09 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
ner' which has > been explicitly imported at (1) That's what I get here with: gcc version 4.7.0 2009 (experimental) [trunk revision 181203] (GCC) Reduced test case: module domain implicit none type :: domain_container contains procedure, nopass :: init end type ty

[Bug target/50911] [4.7 regression] assertion failure in expand_vec_perm_interleave2 with -msse

2011-11-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50911 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c/51061] Deprecated -I- option causes segfault

2011-11-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51061 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug c/51061] Deprecated -I- option causes segfault

2011-11-09 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51061 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-11-09 14:59:41 UTC --- Created attachment 25770 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25770 Untested

[Bug tree-optimization/51062] SLP vectorization of dot (inner) product

2011-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51062 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51064] New: False Positive for -Wparentheses

2011-11-09 Thread sascha.cunz at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51064 Bug #: 51064 Summary: False Positive for -Wparentheses Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3

[Bug driver/51063] New: gcc does not pass the -Fpathname option unmodified to /usr/bin/ld linker (all Darwin systems)

2011-11-09 Thread lutzwei at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51063 Bug #: 51063 Summary: gcc does not pass the -Fpathname option unmodified to /usr/bin/ld linker (all Darwin systems) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2

[Bug c/51061] New: Deprecated -I- option causes segfault

2011-11-09 Thread rmansfield at qnx dot com
bi/sys-root --disable-nls --enable-threads=posix --enable-symvers=gnu --enable-c99 --enable-long-long --enable-target-optspace target_alias=arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi --enable-languages=c++ --disable-shared --disable-libmudflap --disable-libssp Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 2009 (experi

[Bug tree-optimization/51062] New: SLP vectorization of dot (inner) product

2011-11-09 Thread vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51062 Bug #: 51062 Summary: SLP vectorization of dot (inner) product Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Prio

[Bug c++/51060] Temporary object stack space is not re-used

2011-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51060 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/51058] [4.7 Regression] ICE: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:1992

2011-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51058 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

  1   2   >