http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51057
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-09 18:51:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 fails on powerpc*-*-* (see
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-11/msg00620.html ). This is due to
> a
> less precise representation of REAL(16) on ppc (i.e., two REAL(8)) than on
> Intel platforms. The following patch fixes the failure
>
> --- /opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 2011-11-06
> 20:55:43.000000000 +0100
> +++ quad_2_db.f90 2011-11-09 14:06:48.000000000 +0100
> @@ -48,8 +48,8 @@ program test_qp
> case (16)
> if (str1 /= " 1.00000000000000000000000000000000000") call abort()
> if (str2 /= "1.00000000000000000000000000000000000") call abort()
> - if (str3 /= " 1.41421356237309504880168872420969798") call abort()
> - if (str4 /= "1.41421356237309504880168872420969798") call abort()
> + if (str3(1:37) /= " 1.41421356237309504880168872420969") call
> abort()
> + if (str4(1:34) /= "1.41421356237309504880168872420969") call abort()
> block
> real(qp), volatile :: fp2a
> fp2a = 2.0_qp
Please XFAIL this testcase on powerpc, or make this
testcase i686/x64_64 specific. The problem runs rather
deep. See PR 46481 and 47032.
