http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50976
--- Comment #14 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> 2011-11-09 20:21:46 UTC --- Created attachment 25774 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25774 Potential patch #1 I'll regtest this trivial patch when I get home. I Just moved the checks for the strings and the length after the numeric value checks. Jason, could you check this on your cross compiler? This seems simplest - it keeps the walk through the parameter list. I could put the check for size_type inside the POINTER_TYPE bit after a TREE_CHAIN (argtype) and test. Ed