Re: libstdc++ XPASS's on Darwin

2006-08-17 Thread Jack Howarth
Paolo, I would argue that if the failures are targeted at Darwin8, which is MacOS X 10.4, and the problems are resolved in a later point release like 10.4.7, they should be marked as as passing. The point releases on MacOS X are free and contain essential security fixes. Encouraging users to not

Re: libstdc++ XPASS's on Darwin

2006-08-17 Thread Mike Stump
On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:42 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: Well, I note sure how to handle some of these testcases. For instance, 1_strings/basic_string/element_access/char/21674.cc has... // { dg-require-debug-mode "" } // { dg-options "-O0 -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG" } // { dg-do run { xfail *-*-* } } Wel

Re: libstdc++ XPASS's on Darwin

2006-08-17 Thread Joe Buck
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 12:26:12PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote: > On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:57 AM, Joe Buck wrote: > >Can the test framework distinguish based on the OS release? > > Yes. It's a fundamental feature: > > set host_triplet powerpc-apple-darwin9.0.0d1 > set build_triplet powerpc-apple-darwi

Re: libstdc++ XPASS's on Darwin

2006-08-17 Thread Mike Stump
On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:57 AM, Joe Buck wrote: Can the test framework distinguish based on the OS release? Yes. It's a fundamental feature: set host_triplet powerpc-apple-darwin9.0.0d1 set build_triplet powerpc-apple-darwin9.0.0d1 set target_triplet powerpc-apple-darwin9.0.0d1 set target_alias

Re: libstdc++ XPASS's on Darwin

2006-08-17 Thread Joe Buck
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:51:04PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote: > ... just an obvious remark, then I leave the issue to the darwin > maintainers, of course: if some, probably most, of those XPASS are > because of a more recent release of the OS, and the previous ones are > still widespread and su

Re: libstdc++ XPASS's on Darwin

2006-08-17 Thread Paolo Carlini
... just an obvious remark, then I leave the issue to the darwin maintainers, of course: if some, probably most, of those XPASS are because of a more recent release of the OS, and the previous ones are still widespread and supported, I'm not sure you really want to see FAILs on the latter...

Re: libstdc++ XPASS's on Darwin

2006-08-17 Thread Jack Howarth
Mike, Well, I note sure how to handle some of these testcases. For instance, 1_strings/basic_string/element_access/char/21674.cc has... // { dg-require-debug-mode "" } // { dg-options "-O0 -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG" } // { dg-do run { xfail *-*-* } } ...which I assume implies that it really should only

Re: libstdc++ XPASS's on Darwin

2006-08-17 Thread Mike Stump
On Aug 16, 2006, at 10:41 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: We have accumulated five XPASS instances in the libstdc++ testsuite on MacOS X... XPASS: 21_strings/basic_string/element_access/char/21674.cc execution test XPASS: 21_strings/basic_string/element_access/wchar_t/21674.cc execution test