Paolo, I would argue that if the failures are targeted at Darwin8, which is MacOS X 10.4, and the problems are resolved in a later point release like 10.4.7, they should be marked as as passing. The point releases on MacOS X are free and contain essential security fixes. Encouraging users to not stay current with their OS security fixes should not be a goal of the gcc developers. Jack
- Re: libstdc++ XPASS's on Darwin Mike Stump
- Re: libstdc++ XPASS's on Darwin Jack Howarth
- Re: libstdc++ XPASS's on Darwin Paolo Carlini
- Re: libstdc++ XPASS's on Darwin Joe Buck
- Re: libstdc++ XPASS's on Darwin Mike Stump
- Re: libstdc++ XPASS's on Darwin Joe Buck
- Re: libstdc++ XPASS's on Darwin Mike Stump
- Re: libstdc++ XPASS's on Darwin Jack Howarth