On Aug 16, 2006, at 10:41 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
We have accumulated five XPASS instances in the libstdc++
testsuite on MacOS X...
XPASS: 21_strings/basic_string/element_access/char/21674.cc
execution test
XPASS: 21_strings/basic_string/element_access/wchar_t/21674.cc
execution test
XPASS: 23_containers/vector/resize/1.cc execution test
XPASS: 26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for
excess errors)
XPASS: 27_io/ios_base/storage/2.cc execution test
These consistently pass on my build machine and on Apple's regress
tester.
Shouldn't these be changed to no longer be marked as xfail on darwin8?
I don't know of a reason not to. If you have the inclination, would
you like to submit patches to fix this? I don't know if I could
approve them or not, otherwise I would just pre-approve them.
Normally I'd just fix it myself under the obvious rule, but I can't
be certain the change is obvious.
