On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:51:04PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote: > ... just an obvious remark, then I leave the issue to the darwin > maintainers, of course: if some, probably most, of those XPASS are > because of a more recent release of the OS, and the previous ones are > still widespread and supported, I'm not sure you really want to see > FAILs on the latter...
Can the test framework distinguish based on the OS release? Probably not with sufficient granularity, I suppose. It seems like we need something autoconf-like for the test suite: first you run a test for missing OS features or known flaws, then you use that to adjust your notion of which tests are expected to pass.
