On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 07:18:24 +0200 Pierre Couderc said:
> Since 0.23, my computer (debian buster) crashes on
> "menu,system,suspend" command. (ctel-alt-F2 inactive).
>
> What do I miss? It was ok with 0.22.
it's ok for me on 0.23 ... so ... backtraces and all the usual debug stuff
needed.
Since 0.23, my computer (debian buster) crashes on
"menu,system,suspend" command. (ctel-alt-F2 inactive).
What do I miss? It was ok with 0.22.
Thanks
PC
___
enlightenment-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://li
On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 10:01:14 +0200 Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> On 09/12/2013 08:40, Nex6 wrote:
> > * Carsten Haitzler [2013-12-08 21:42:25
> > +0900]:
> >
> >> On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 10:25:04 + Mick
> >> said:
> >>
> >>> On Sunday 08 Dec 2013 01:48:18 Steven@e wrote:
> >> Hello beber, just for
On 09/12/2013 08:40, Nex6 wrote:
> * Carsten Haitzler [2013-12-08 21:42:25 +0900]:
>
>> On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 10:25:04 + Mick said:
>>
>>> On Sunday 08 Dec 2013 01:48:18 Steven@e wrote:
>> Hello beber, just for information, you dont need FUSE anymore to use
>> ZFS. zfsonlinux solves th
* Bertrand Jacquin [2013-12-09 02:41:18 +0100]:
> On 2013-12-09 01:52, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 12:17:53 -0500 Christopher Barry
> > said:
> >
> >> On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 21:42:25 +0900
> >> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 10:25:04 +000
* Carsten Haitzler [2013-12-08 21:42:25 +0900]:
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 10:25:04 + Mick said:
>
> > On Sunday 08 Dec 2013 01:48:18 Steven@e wrote:
> > > >> Hello beber, just for information, you dont need FUSE anymore to use
> > > >> ZFS. zfsonlinux solves this.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for th
On 2013-12-09 01:52, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 12:17:53 -0500 Christopher Barry
> said:
>
>> On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 21:42:25 +0900
>> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>
>> > On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 10:25:04 + Mick
>> > said:
>> >
>> > > On Sunday 08 Dec 2013 01:48:18 Stev
On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 12:17:53 -0500 Christopher Barry
said:
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 21:42:25 +0900
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 10:25:04 + Mick
> > said:
> >
> > > On Sunday 08 Dec 2013 01:48:18 Steven@e wrote:
> > > > >> Hello beber, just for information,
On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 21:42:25 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 10:25:04 + Mick
> said:
>
> > On Sunday 08 Dec 2013 01:48:18 Steven@e wrote:
> > > >> Hello beber, just for information, you dont need FUSE anymore
> > > >> to use ZFS. zfsonlinux solves this.
>
On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 10:25:04 + Mick said:
> On Sunday 08 Dec 2013 01:48:18 Steven@e wrote:
> > >> Hello beber, just for information, you dont need FUSE anymore to use
> > >> ZFS. zfsonlinux solves this.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the info, but why should we need this ? I see no valid
> > > reaso
On Sunday 08 Dec 2013 01:48:18 Steven@e wrote:
> >> Hello beber, just for information, you dont need FUSE anymore to use
> >> ZFS. zfsonlinux solves this.
> >
> > Thanks for the info, but why should we need this ? I see no valid
> > reason.
There are out-of-tree Linux kernel modules care of ZFSO
On 07/12/2013 22:16, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> On 2013-12-07 22:09, Guillaume Friloux wrote:
>> On 07/12/2013 21:05, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
>>> Moving to other FS is not an option. BTRFS that format is not yet
>>> completed/fully defined, has elementary fsck when not giving needed
>>> features. ZF
ZFS on linux is clearly not stable yet. not an option.
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> On 2013-12-07 22:09, Guillaume Friloux wrote:
>> On 07/12/2013 21:05, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
>>>
>>> Moving to other FS is not an option. BTRFS that format is not yet
>>> completed/f
On 2013-12-07 22:09, Guillaume Friloux wrote:
> On 07/12/2013 21:05, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
>>
>> Moving to other FS is not an option. BTRFS that format is not yet
>> completed/fully defined, has elementary fsck when not giving needed
>> features. ZFS using FUSE is not going to happened on that c
On 07/12/2013 21:05, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
>
> Moving to other FS is not an option. BTRFS that format is not yet
> completed/fully defined, has elementary fsck when not giving needed
> features. ZFS using FUSE is not going to happened on that critical host.
>
> Kernel was a 3.7 and have been upda
On 2013-12-07 20:30, Christopher Barry wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 04:20:37 +1000
> David Seikel wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 18:11:16 + Mick
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Saturday 07 Dec 2013 17:22:06 David Seikel wrote:
>> > > On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:41:36 +0100 Bertrand Jacquin
>> > >
>> > >
>>
On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 04:20:37 +1000
David Seikel wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 18:11:16 + Mick
> wrote:
>
> > On Saturday 07 Dec 2013 17:22:06 David Seikel wrote:
> > > On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:41:36 +0100 Bertrand Jacquin
> > >
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > >Missing subscribers on git list, e-b0
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 18:11:16 + Mick
wrote:
> On Saturday 07 Dec 2013 17:22:06 David Seikel wrote:
> > On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:41:36 +0100 Bertrand Jacquin
> >
> >
> > wrote:
> > >Missing subscribers on git list, e-b0rk list entirely corrupted
> >
> > e-b0rk got borked, think that was just
On Saturday 07 Dec 2013 17:22:06 David Seikel wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:41:36 +0100 Bertrand Jacquin
>
> wrote:
> >Missing subscribers on git list, e-b0rk list entirely corrupted
>
> e-b0rk got borked, think that was just asking for trouble. B-)
Perhaps time to move to ZFS?
--
Regar
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:41:36 +0100 Bertrand Jacquin
wrote:
>Missing subscribers on git list, e-b0rk list entirely corrupted
e-b0rk got borked, think that was just asking for trouble. B-)
--
A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants
coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in
Hi,
This morning e5 have been unavailable for 2 hours and 30 minutes starting
at about 10:40 UTC.
All is back again, but if you have strange behaviour, please reply (and
CC: me). Thanks to thoses who already did.
The EXT4 filesystem that host the VMs used for Enlightenment internal and
public pu
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Vikram Goyal wrote:
> #5 eina_list_data_get (list=0x8)
> at /opt/e17/include/eina-1/eina/eina_inline_list.x:47
> No locals.
> #6 _e_int_menus_apps_scan (m=m@entry=0x911c918, menu=menu@entry=0x8fdd578)
> at e_int_menus.c:658
> entry =
> mi
Hi,
Compiled EFL as told. I couldn't find any debuginfo catalyst rpm on the
rpmfusion repo & also no updates were done as none were available.
The flags were:
CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -O -g -ggdb3 -g -O0"
CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -g -O0"
The crash report is as follows:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 4:33 AM, Vikram Goyal wrote:
> Hello Friends,
>
> I don't know if one should file a bug report like this but the ticket
> system is not accepting the report citing it as spam.
>
> I compiled E17 with the following options:
> ./easy_e17.sh -s -k --threads=1
> --skip=emotion
Hello Friends,
I don't know if one should file a bug report like this but the ticket
system is not accepting the report citing it as spam.
I compiled E17 with the following options:
./easy_e17.sh -s -k --threads=1
--skip=emotion,b_and_w,efenniht,empris,everything-mpris,everything-pidgin,everythi
That was the trick. efreet_language_get() calls efreet_parse_locale(),
which looks to three possible environmental variables: LANG, LC_ALL and
LC_MESSAGES. None of those were set in my environment, which caused all
sorts of problems.
Once I set one of them, e started up properly. Which is a relief
On Monday, December 3, 2012, Jose Souza wrote:
> Its seen that efreet_language_get() in efreet_cache_init() is returning
> NULL...
Edbus should check null pointer and report error with EINA_SAFETY
This for strings, arrays, object paths and everything else that may lead to
crashes. If there is n
Its seen that efreet_language_get() in efreet_cache_init() is returning NULL...
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 3:50 PM, mik firestone wrote:
> CTION__ = "_edbus_message_arguments_vset"
> #9 0xb7186732 in _edbus_proxy_vcall (prox
--
I need some help. I am assuming this is something on my machine, since
nobody else has mentioned seeing these issues.
I have built rev 79984 and every time I try to start E, nothing happens.
When I switch back to my terminal window, I just see PAUSE. I have tried
this with a clean ~/.e and I see n
hi
I think i found two bugs
1. I am able to add the same binding to n times , for example: (Left Button +
WIN) .
2. set any mouse button to "command" and here put: 1 1 1 1 , press apply and
now try to delete one 1 . e crash .
Thanks
- -Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.oper
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:54:24 -0800 (PST) mynullvoid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Hi there I would like to know, how do I fix my system where every time I
> click at Advance button, my session will crash, for example I am trying to
> create another Shelves, I clicked at Configure and Later when I
Hi there I would like to know, how do I fix my system where every time I click
at Advance button, my session will crash, for example I am trying to create
another Shelves, I clicked at Configure and Later when I clicked at Advanced,
it will crash asking me either to F1 (recover) or F2 (exit)
32 matches
Mail list logo
