Re: after closing the lid and reopening it the screen remains blank

2010-09-10 Thread Andy Isaacson
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 08:44:48AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > On Fr, 10 Sep 2010, Andy Isaacson wrote: > > FWIW, 2.6.36-rc3-00396-gbe6200a suspend-to-ram works for me on GM45 > > I never said that it has anything to do with suspend to ram. Ah, sorry for misunderstanding. My

Re: after closing the lid and reopening it the screen remains blank

2010-09-10 Thread Andy Isaacson
f5, can you try current linux-2.6.git ? If it still fails, please post - lspci -vvv - /var/log/Xorg.0.log from after the failure - dmesg -andy -- Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using the

[2.6.35-rc regression] i915: cursor corruption on Arrandale caused by 9b8c4a0b215e

2010-06-05 Thread Andy Isaacson
I've attached a JPG of a corrupted cursor. -andy <>-- ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize li

nouveau userspace bits for 2.6.34

2010-04-12 Thread Andy Isaacson
face version 0.0.16? (I'm on Debian and Ubuntu, but building my own from git is fine.) Thanks, -andy -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs pr

Re: [Bug 15293] Flash video laggy inside Firefox only with KMS

2010-02-28 Thread Andy Furniss
working/not working depending on uts with the kbluetooth vid above using seamonkey 2.02. But I fear you may be correct and despite comment #24 I am seeing a separate issue and am derailing this bug, I will file a new one - I can now recreate my problem without flash. > (In reply t

Re: [Bug 15293] Flash video laggy inside Firefox only with KMS

2010-02-28 Thread Andy Furniss
Andy Furniss wrote: > Andy Furniss wrote: > >> Out of curiosity, why does it work OK with UMS? > > To possibly answer my own question for my case - AGP cards have accel > UTS/DFS disabled in UMS. This does seem to be the case, if I enable uts/dfs in UMS (with BusTypePCIE) I

Re: [Bug 15293] Flash video laggy inside Firefox only with KMS

2010-02-28 Thread Andy Furniss
Andy Furniss wrote: > Out of curiosity, why does it work OK with UMS? To possibly answer my own question for my case - AGP cards have accel UTS/DFS disabled in UMS. -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the

Re: [Bug 15293] Flash video laggy inside Firefox only with KMS

2010-02-28 Thread Andy Furniss
[email protected] wrote: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293 > > > > > > --- Comment #25 from Pauli 2010-02-27 06:39:33 --- > I vote for NOTOURBUG too. > > Maybe ddx could be a bit better optimized for XGetSubImage that flash is using > but in end we can't get it

Re: Problem with drm-radeon-testing commit - drm/ttm: Avoid conflicting reserve_memtype during ttm_tt_set_page_caching.

2010-02-09 Thread Andy Furniss
Andy Furniss wrote: > db78e27de7e29a6db6be7caf607cf803d84094aa is first bad commit I have confirmed by running both todays and yesterdays heads with and without that commit reverted that it is the one causing the problem. Another test I tried was with agpmode=-1. This does avoid the prob

Problem with drm-radeon-testing commit - drm/ttm: Avoid conflicting reserve_memtype during ttm_tt_set_page_caching.

2010-02-05 Thread Andy Furniss
Card is an AGP RV670. libdrm,mesa,ddx and xorg are current gits. After the recent batch of commits to drm-radeon-testing I have a perf problem. It doesn't show immediately, but after running a timedemo on nexuiz followed by openarena, further timedemos on either will have very poor performance

Re: [2.6.33-rc6-git regression] idr fix breaks Xorg

2010-02-03 Thread Andy Isaacson
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 05:28:37PM -0800, Andy Isaacson wrote: > On my Dell Latitude e4300 commit 859ddf0974 ("idr: fix a critical > misallocation bug") causes Xorg to segfault with the following > backtrace: > > ... > (II) intel(0): Initializing HW Cursor > (II)

Re: [2.6.33-rc6-git regression] idr fix breaks Xorg

2010-02-03 Thread Andy Isaacson
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 12:11:41PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > On 02/04/2010 10:28 AM, Andy Isaacson wrote: > > On my Dell Latitude e4300 commit 859ddf0974 ("idr: fix a critical > > misallocation bug") causes Xorg to segfault with the following > > backtrace: > &

[2.6.33-rc6-git regression] idr fix breaks Xorg

2010-02-03 Thread Andy Isaacson
re (presumably?) not seeing this crash. (Gzipped, alas, because AFAIK 70KB will exceed vger's size liimit.) -andy kconfig.gz Description: application/gunzip -- The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storag

Re: [git pull] drm

2009-12-11 Thread Andy Walls
; their code either. > So what, if someone outside RedHat is ok to sign it off, it can go > into staging? If it's that simple I don't mind signing it off > (including the dubious bits), I can take the blame if that helps > things move forward. Co

Re: [git pull] drm

2009-12-11 Thread Andy Walls
to fall squarely in the "authors don't want it merged" category. Your point does highlight, though, that it is worth talking to the author directly to understand the obstacles, as Alan mentioned. Regards, Andy -

Re: [PATCH 1/1] i915: fix up a raw 64bit divide

2009-07-02 Thread Andy Whitcroft
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 09:12:55AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:20:59 +0100 > Andy Whitcroft wrote: > > > We are seeing compilation failures on i386 in some environments due > > to an undefined reference as below: > > > > ERROR: "

[PATCH 1/1] i915: fix up a raw 64bit divide

2009-07-01 Thread Andy Whitcroft
We are seeing compilation failures on i386 in some environments due to an undefined reference as below: ERROR: "__udivdi3" [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko] undefined! This is generated due to a raw 64 bit divide in the i915 driver. Fix up this raw divide. Signed-off-by: Andy

Re: [PATCH 1/2] radeon: fix radeon kms framebuffer device

2009-06-23 Thread Andy Lutomirski
Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Jerome Glisse wrote: >> smem.start is a physical address which kernel can remap to access >> video memory of the fb buffer. We now pin the fb buffer into vram >> by doing so we are loosing vram but fbdev need to be reworked to >> allow change in

Re: [PATCH 1/2] radeon: fix radeon kms framebuffer device

2009-06-22 Thread Andy Lutomirski
his (and the corresponding 2/2 initialization order, but with radeon as a module), and plymouth seems to be fully functional (graphical boot, password prompt, etc). (The driver set the wrong mode, but that's a different issue.) Thanks! Tested-by

Linux OpenGL ABI discussion

2005-09-28 Thread Andy Ritger
00157.html It would be great if those involved in developing and distributing OpenGL implementations on Linux joined the discussion on the lsb-desktop alias. Thanks, - Andy --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Ce

Re: [Xorg] Re: Damage/Composite + direct rendering clients

2004-05-24 Thread Andy Ritger
On Mon, 24 May 2004, Ian Romanick wrote: > Andy Ritger wrote: > > > The other concern (how to make sure direct rendering has completed > > by the time the drawable is used as a source in a composite > > operation) conceptually would be solved as you describe, but I >

Re: [Xorg] Damage/Composite + direct rendering clients

2004-05-18 Thread Andy Ritger
On Tue, 18 May 2004, Keith Packard wrote: > > Around 1 o'clock on May 18, Andy Ritger wrote: > > > I'm debating whether it is better for the X server to not even know > > of the damage until it has completed in hardware, or if it is > > better to tell the

Re: [Xorg] Re: Damage/Composite + direct rendering clients

2004-05-18 Thread Andy Ritger
On Mon, 17 May 2004, Jim Gettys wrote: > On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 16:03, Andy Ritger wrote: > > > > >2) some damage occurs, composite manager sends composite > request, > > > > additional rendering is performed, part of which the > composite >

Re: [Xorg] Damage/Composite + direct rendering clients

2004-05-18 Thread Andy Ritger
(including the XGrabServer request) are not processed until that client has ungrabbed the server. The composite manager would block until the other client had ungrabbed. - Andy > Søren > --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.

Re: [Xorg] Damage/Composite + direct rendering clients

2004-05-18 Thread Andy Ritger
On Mon, 17 May 2004, Keith Packard wrote: > > Around 15 o'clock on May 17, Andy Ritger wrote: [snip] > > The tricky part here is that the damage event shouldn't be sent to > > Damage clients until the hardware has completed the damage, but > > that is the v

Re: [Xorg] Re: Damage/Composite + direct rendering clients

2004-05-17 Thread Andy Ritger
On Mon, 17 May 2004, Jim Gettys wrote: > On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 11:41, Andy Ritger wrote: > > I've given some thought to how best to integrate direct rendering > > clients with Damage/Composite. For the below discussion, I'll focus > > on GLX as the direct renderi

Re: [Xorg] Damage/Composite + direct rendering clients

2004-05-17 Thread Andy Ritger
On Mon, 17 May 2004, Keith Packard wrote: > > Around 11 o'clock on May 17, Andy Ritger wrote: > > > How should a direct rendering client interact with Damage/Composite? > > There seem to be two pieces to this: damage notification, and > > synchronization. &g

Damage/Composite + direct rendering clients

2004-05-17 Thread Andy Ritger
re OpenGL performance is more important to them than window system compositing. Feedback very welcome. Thanks, - Andy --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastes

Re: [Xorg] Re: Damage/Composite + direct rendering clients

2004-05-17 Thread Andy Ritger
On Mon, 17 May 2004, Alex Deucher wrote: > > --- Andy Ritger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > - A Video Overlay Xv Adaptor is obviously fundamentally incompatible > > with Damage/Composite. Should X drivers no longer advertise >

DRM v1.3 under 2.4.24-epia PCI changes?

2004-05-12 Thread Andy Jamieson
Hi, Getting there with the process of getting all the VIA stuff working. Using 2.4.24-epia1 kernel and XF86 4.4, and got X working with the VIA driver as below. XFree86 Version 4.4.0 Release Date: 29 February 2004 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6 Build Operating System: Linux

Re: BK for X11 development? (was Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Status of XFree86 4.4.0 integration?)

2004-03-09 Thread Andy Isaacson
[responding from my personal account to avoid the subscriber-only filter] On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:40:28PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Andy Isaacson wrote: > > [perhaps DRI / fd.o should consider BitKeeper] > > For DRI at least, it's been discussed & rejected. My a

BK for X11 development? (was Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Status of XFree86 4.4.0 integration?)

2004-03-09 Thread Andy Isaacson
elopers would necessarily be a showstopper -- so long as the community as a whole can agree, and no contributors feel excluded. -andy --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, P

Re: [Dri-devel] New DRM design (was ATI I2C, MONID)

2004-02-09 Thread Andy Isaacson
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:40:25AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > bk clone bk://mesa3d.bkbits.net/drm > ERROR-Lock fail: possible permission problem. Oops. OK, fixed. Sorry for the inconvenience. (In the future, please let [EMAIL PROTECTED] know of such problems.)

Re: [Dri-devel] 32/64bit issues in ioctl struct passing

2003-03-04 Thread Andy Isaacson
id*), sizeof(long), sizeof(int)); return 0; } $ cc foo.c $ ./a.out void*=4 long=4 int=4 $ cc -xarch=v9 foo.c $ ./a.out void*=8 long=8 int=4 $ cc -V cc: Sun WorkShop 6 update 1 C 5.2 2000/09/11 usage: cc [ options] files. Use 'cc -flags' for details -andy --

Re: [Dri-devel] S3TC

2002-12-19 Thread Andy Ross
Ian Romanick wrote: > Andy Ross wrote: > > And there is no one involved with DRI with assets to pay such an > > award anyway. > > Except all the distros. How is that an argument against DRI implementing S3TC? If the distribution vendors don't want to ship it because o

Re: [Dri-devel] S3TC

2002-12-19 Thread Andy Ross
omeone correct me if I'm wrong. Again, I'm not a lawyer. But it would seem to be *very* hard for VIA to claim damages from DRI distribution of an algorithm that is already freely available. At worst, they could force the algorithm's removal from the code base. Andy -- Andr

Re: [Dri-devel] S3TC

2002-12-19 Thread Andy Ross
ages. And there is no one involved with DRI with assets to pay such an award anyway. Really, the worst that can happen is that you will be forced to take the code out. Andy -- Andrew J. RossNextBus Information Systems Senior Software Engineer Emeryville, CA [EMAIL

Re: [Dri-devel] R200 notes & issues

2002-12-17 Thread Andy Ross
, exactly? :) Accept my profuse apologies for the hubris of posting the thing. But I can't apologize for writing it. Andy -- Andrew J. RossNextBus Information Systems Senior Software Engineer Emeryville, CA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nextbus.com &q

Re: [Dri-devel] R200 notes & issues

2002-12-17 Thread Andy Ross
Keith Whitwell wrote: > Andy Ross wrote: > > ATI blows you guys away in glxgears. I see 38% faster frame rates > > with their drivers. > > Actually what gears does most is glClear and glXSwapBuffers, with a > small amount of glCallList. You can speed up swapbuffers by tu

Re: [Dri-devel] R200 notes & issues

2002-12-16 Thread Andy Ross
Keith Whitwell wrote: > Andy Ross wrote: > > Is it possible [...] to get the client-side libGL to look somethere > > *other* that /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri for drivers? > > It's LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH Perfect. Thanks. > > You also don't exhibit a texture bor

[Dri-devel] R200 notes & issues

2002-12-16 Thread Andy Ross
at the printf works just fine. It also causes about a 5% loss in framerate in FlightGear when flying at night due to all the console traffic (runway lights are points). :) Andy -- Andrew J. RossNextBus Information Systems Senior Software Engineer Emeryvi

Re: [Dri-devel] New ATI FireGL drivers announced

2002-11-22 Thread Andy Isaacson
at would be 64-bit), but it's just speculation unconfirmed by Apple. > Or i am just confusing it with the DEC Alpha which is 64 bit. > Anyone knows it there are Alpha's out that do have AGP slots? There are Alpha systems with AGP slots, but they're fairly uncommon. -andy -

Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon 9000 patch

2002-10-29 Thread Andy Ross
ftware-compatible. The R300 was supposed to be a new architecture, no? Andy -- Andrew J. RossNextBus Information Systems Senior Software Engineer Emeryville, CA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nextbus.com "Men go crazy in conflagrations. They only get better

[Dri-devel] R200: new and exciting crash

2002-10-02 Thread Andy Dustman
his on two separate occasions. Machine locks up, although I believe on one occassion SysRq still worked. * Setting R200_DEBUG=sanity and running glxgears *immediately* locks the machine hard with no output. -- Andy Dustman PGP: 0x930B8AB6 @ .net http://dustman.net/andy "C

Re: [Dri-devel] Snaps for gcc<3, glibc-2.2

2002-10-02 Thread Andy Dustman
pshots on my Red Hat 7.3 system, which is what they used to be built on, and which also seems to be more portable to other systems at present. -- Andy Dustman PGP: 0x930B8AB6 @ .net http://dustman.net/andy "Cogito, ergo sum.&q

Re: [Dri-devel] Snaps for gcc<3, glibc-2.2

2002-10-02 Thread Andy Dustman
7;t work unless you have Red Hat 8.0 and/or glibc-2.3; I'm not even sure that they work on that platform. Broken snapshots are worse than no snapshots at all (you can't download something that isn't going to work if it isn't there). -- Andy Dustman PGP: 0x930B8AB6

Re: [Dri-devel] Snaps for gcc<3, glibc-2.2

2002-10-02 Thread Andy Dustman
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 10:57, José Fonseca wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 09:40:20AM -0400, Andy Dustman wrote: > >What didn't work was making a binary snapshot (via the dripkg.sh script) > >and installing that over the system-wide X installation: It does the the > >s

Re: [Dri-devel] Snaps for gcc<3, glibc-2.2

2002-10-02 Thread Andy Dustman
a list of what libraries must be upgraded? The GL directory in the dripkg is empty in all the old snapshots; I suspect that's a Bad Thing. -- Andy Dustman PGP: 0x930B8AB6 @ .net http://dustman.net/andy "Cogito, ergo sum." -- Rene Descartes "I yam what I

Re: [Dri-devel] Snapshots now being built with gcc 3.2

2002-09-26 Thread Andy Dustman
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 20:50, Andy Dustman wrote: > On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 03:40, Charl P. Botha wrote: > > > serious note, have you tried replacing your libxaa.a yet to eliminate > > the possibility of that signal 11 that we've been seeing with the last > > few sna

Re: [Dri-devel] Snapshots now being built with gcc 3.2

2002-09-26 Thread Andy Dustman
ave 3.0 in stable and 3.2 in testing). Is it possible you have changed some of your compiler options? The snapshots are about twice the size they used to be. -- Andy Dustman PGP: 0x930B8AB6 @ .net http://dustman.net/andy "Cogito, ergo sum." -- Rene Descartes

Re: [Dri-devel] Snapshots now being built with gcc 3.2

2002-09-26 Thread Andy Dustman
ne, but the video goes dead: The monitor no longer syncs up and switching VTs doesn't help. -- Andy Dustman PGP: 0x930B8AB6 @ .net http://dustman.net/andy "Cogito, ergo sum." -- Rene Descartes "I yam what I

Re: [Dri-devel] Snapshots now being built with gcc 3.2

2002-09-25 Thread Andy Dustman
Most likely Red Hat provides this in a gcc-compat package. I'm trying now to build some myself from CVS, but didn't have much luck last night (result didn't run). -- Andy Dustman PGP: 0x930B8AB6 @ .net http://dustman.net/andy "Cogito, ergo sum."

Re: [Dri-devel] NURBs + Autonormal peculiarity

2002-07-12 Thread Andy Isaacson
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 07:54:11AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote: > Andy Isaacson wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 06:10:01PM -0400, Mike Westall wrote: > >>The attached program illustrates a shading anomaly > >>we have encountered while attempting to use autonormal &g

Re: [Dri-devel] NURBs + Autonormal peculiarity

2002-07-11 Thread Andy Isaacson
that is simply latent on SGI | NV. I ran the test on a Solaris 8 system with the OpenGL "ogl123_rt32_64" downloaded from Sun's OpenGL for Solaris website (Ultra 10 with Elite3D graphics) and it rendered correctly. -andy --- This

Re: [Dri-devel] SIGSEGV on VT switch

2002-06-27 Thread Andy Isaacson
* > I dont't think this is more informative. The output went into the /var/log/XFree86.0.log (or to the console where you started the X server), not to the GDB screen. This caught me the first time I tried to use it, too. :) -andy

Re: [Dri-devel] slow tdfx OpenGL since Mesa-4.0.1

2002-04-14 Thread Andy Furniss
On Sunday 14 April 2002 1:47 pm, Jacek Pop?awski wrote: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 10:14:17AM +0100, Andy Furniss wrote: > > I have a 3 2000 on a PII350 and my quake3demo timedemos are the best > > yet. > > Strange. > > > glxinfo shows - > > > > OpenGL

Re: [Dri-devel] slow tdfx OpenGL since Mesa-4.0.1

2002-04-12 Thread Andy Furniss
86/MMX OpenGL version string: 1.2 Mesa 4.0.2 Note version. I guess yours should say 3dnow if you set the define in host.def and have it in kernel - see compile guide. (I guess K6-2 can use 3dnow?) As an aside does glxinfo turn your gamma up a bit - mine does but xgamma still says

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 Tuxracer doesn't work

2002-03-27 Thread Andy Furniss
lots of action around as low as 12 fps (this was after tweaking - no gun drawn etc.). I'm in the same position now with a Voodoo3 - 10fps on beach in wolfenstein :-( What happens if you try software under wine? Andy. ___ Dri-devel mailing list

Re: [Dri-devel] [PATCH] Wolfenstein on r128

2002-02-21 Thread Andy Furniss
/ the drivers to be optimised / quality reduced in a game specific hack of any sort? Thanks. Andy. ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

[Dri-devel] Option "omit xfree86-dga" Voodoo3

2001-06-20 Thread Andy
I notice that this isn't commented out in the example config on the resources page. I know there used to be problems - but without it the mouse in Quake 3 was 'orrible for me (USB Intellimouse). Should it be changed - or a comment ad

Re: [Dri-devel] GL_DECAL and texture corruption fixes for MGA driver

2001-06-14 Thread Andy Isaacson
is patch takes Tribes2 from "utterly unplayable at 0.5 FPS" to "at least I can look around and shoot at stuff" at something like 10 or 20 FPS. (G400 OEM 32MB, dual PIII 666.) I'm still not sure it's up to snuff with the Windows version, but this is a huge improvement.

Re: [Dri-devel] linux drm version dont match

2001-06-04 Thread Andy Isaacson
;[dri] mga.o kernel module version is 2.0.1 but version 3.0.x is needed. > [dri] Disabling DRI." It's probably looking for the one in xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel. Go to that directory and do "make -f Makefile.linux TREE=/path/to/linu

Re: [Dri-devel] DRI locking up on gears w/ mga

2001-05-31 Thread Andy Isaacson
ourself, or wait for 4.1.0 which should have the fixes. -andy ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

[Dri-devel] -ldl seems to be required on latest Debian

2001-05-04 Thread Andy Isaacson
rget($(LIBNAME),$(SOREV),$(OBJS),$(OBJS) $(THREADOBJS) $(LIBDL),.,.) InstallSharedLibrary($(LIBNAME),$(SOREV),$(SHLIBDIR)) #if LinkGLToUsrLib && AlternateUsrLibDir install:: -andy ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sou

Re: [Dri-devel] G400 and blending

2001-05-04 Thread Andy Isaacson
has done a great job, and I'm > working with them to make Linux T2 with the DRI the best combination to > play with :-) Er, where?! I want to buy a Linux boxed version (no reason to add one to the beancounter's Windows column) but I can

Re: [Dri-devel] Featurelist

2001-05-03 Thread Andy Isaacson
cult to navigate because it's so finely broken down. If significant new information were added (statuses on each supported card for example) then perhaps that should go on a new page, but I don't think that's what you're proposing here. -andy ___

Re: [Dri-devel] CVSUp access?

2001-05-03 Thread Andy Isaacson
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 09:42:46AM -0700, Daryll Strauss wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:09:46AM -0400, David Dawes wrote: > > On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 02:48:10PM -0500, Andy Isaacson wrote: > > > Does the DRI project offer CVSUp access? > > It doesn't, but I&#

[Dri-devel] CVSUp access?

2001-05-02 Thread Andy Isaacson
e.net - cvs.dri.sourceforge.net isn't listening on port 5999 - no documentation mentions CVSUp. but I thought I'd ask anyways, just in case I missed something. -andy ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] Anyone still using 2.3.x ?

2001-04-26 Thread Andy Isaacson
. I say kill it. The existence of 2.4 should obviate any reason to run 2.3. -andy ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel