--- Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 02:24, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> >>>
> >>>I added devfs support, and I also wrote some initail Hot-Plug support.
> >>>However after the fifth week of trying to keep my DRI relitivly new I
> >>>gave up.
>
> I looked though the l
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL
shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-15-08 21:33 ---
The latest news from me is that
linux/pci_ids.h just had a check-in which caused a big
merge conflict with my patch. I have tried to sort it
out.
Please check Radeon PCI IDs and chip families in
radeonfb driver. It is important that the PCI IDs of
secondary devices be marked as such.
This patch merges Rage128 and Radeon changes
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 13:13:13 -0700
Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Felix Kühling wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > this is hopefully the final version of the per-screen dynamic GLX
> > extensions patch. Major changes from the last version:
> >
> > - per-screen data in __GLXscreenConfigs
> >
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 21:25:55 +0200
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian Romanick wrote:
> > >I'm using a Radeon 7500 (RV200 QW) on an Athlon XP1700+,
> > >but glxgears does only reach about 370-440 fps, which is
> > >(AFAIR on IRC) way below the expected performance for that
> > >ma
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL
shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-15-08 17:37 ---
Ok, as an addendum to my own co
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL
shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-15-08 17:30 ---
Jan: In comment #101, your prob
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL
shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-15-08 16:19 ---
Hi folks,
thanks again for the
Felix Kühling wrote:
Hello,
this is hopefully the final version of the per-screen dynamic GLX
extensions patch. Major changes from the last version:
- per-screen data in __GLXscreenConfigs
- __DRIscreen has an opaque pointer back to the screenConfigs
- Bumped the internal libGL API version to 200
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL
shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-15-08 10:02 ---
Wow, I've actually got some 3D
Ian Romanick wrote:
> >I'm using a Radeon 7500 (RV200 QW) on an Athlon XP1700+,
> >but glxgears does only reach about 370-440 fps, which is
> >(AFAIR on IRC) way below the expected performance for that
> >machine. I tested both 4.3.0 (Debian pre1v1) and latest
> >binary DRI on top, but it didn't ch
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL
shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-15-08 13:55 ---
Is it possible to get the drive
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Hi,
I'm using a Radeon 7500 (RV200 QW) on an Athlon XP1700+,
but glxgears does only reach about 370-440 fps, which is
(AFAIR on IRC) way below the expected performance for that
machine. I tested both 4.3.0 (Debian pre1v1) and latest
binary DRI on top, but it didn't change
Mike Mestnik wrote:
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 02:24, Mike Mestnik wrote:
--- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 04:27, Mike Mestnik wrote:
I have made patches for DRI, but thay never seam to get maintained.
What are those patches
On Gwe, 2003-08-15 at 01:13, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > +config DRM_SIS
> > + tristate "SiS video cards"
> > + depends on DRM && AGP && FB_SIS
> > + help
> > + Choose this option if you have a SiS 630 or compatibel video
Typo - compaible, also only works with XFree 4.2
> >
---
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL
shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=555
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-15-08 10:50 ---
Sorry for taking so long. I ju
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL
shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-15-08 10:50 ---
Michel, thank you for your comm
Hi,
I'm using a Radeon 7500 (RV200 QW) on an Athlon XP1700+,
but glxgears does only reach about 370-440 fps, which is
(AFAIR on IRC) way below the expected performance for that
machine. I tested both 4.3.0 (Debian pre1v1) and latest
binary DRI on top, but it didn't change much.
I tested both the DR
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL
shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-15-08 09:51 ---
Are you using the patched versi
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 11:43:40AM -0700, Philip Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 07:47:11AM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > ...
> > Indeed I have. And there is a reason that we have a policy at BitMover
> > where "formatting changes" are prohibited and we make people redo their
> > changesets
> Putting the EDID data into the RAM copy will never
> work the case where there are multiple cards since
> there is only one copy of the ROM in low RAM.
Yup, but at least it works for single cards, and that
helps a lot of users until radeonfb can do better
> Personally I'd just like to ignore t
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL
shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-15-08 04:01 ---
Hi, I think there is a problem
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL
shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-15-08 07:00 ---
My expertise in linux is not ye
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL
shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-15-08 06:54 ---
Erlend, you need to make sure t
On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 22:31, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Ok,
> I just did another kernel merge to pick up the i810 compatibility bits,
> and decided it is time to try to merge back some of the stuff that has
> accumulated in the standard kernel and that makes it more painful than
> necessary to exa
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 11:21:23PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> To get it to work well you need a card that can push data by DMA
> from the framebuffer to the other card and kernel side driver code
> to do the push triggering since XFree86 Get/PutImage methods don't
> do DMA (tiled DMA Get/PutIm
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 11:13:05AM -0600, Nicholas Leippe wrote:
> Is it possible to put the older (pci) card in the system w/the radeon,
> have the radeon render to a texture, and have the older card simply
> display the texture?
If you want to blit the whole desktop from one card to the o
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL
shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-15-08 07:28 ---
Apart from loading the agpgart
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL
shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-15-08 07:57 ---
One additional thing I noticed
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL
shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-15-08 07:41 ---
Hm, I tried this:
/sbin/mo
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.Please do not reply to this
email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter
your comments there.]
You have one or more bugs assigned to you in the Bugzilla
bugsystem (http://bugs.xfree86.org/) that require
attention
31 matches
Mail list logo
