Re: Status of magic-removal

2006-02-24 Thread pbx
Thanks in advance for the status update, Adrian, I think it's a good idea. I'm not surprised things stalled out a little -- with 0.92 slated to incorporate magic-removal, there's less incentive to work on the current trunk, and with so much backwards-incompatible stuff the merge is sure to be chal

Re: Status of magic-removal

2006-02-23 Thread Adrian Holovaty
On 2/23/06, Christopher Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To an outsider like myself, it looks like there's been a rush towards > a major refactoring that (pretty much) stopped somewhere along half > the way, leaving quite a number of those features that make Django > such a great framework non-fu

Re: Status of magic-removal

2006-02-23 Thread Christopher Lenz
Am 21.02.2006 um 22:58 schrieb Jacob Kaplan-Moss: > I, for one, want to get m-r wrapped up and merged back to trunk as > soon as humanely possible. I feel like it's starting to be a drag on > new users trying to figure out why development on trunk seems to have > stopped, and I want to get us all

Re: Status of magic-removal

2006-02-22 Thread Tim Keating
Would it be worthwhile for the people with a thorough understanding of what's going on under the hood to create a tickets in Trac for the work remaining to finalize m-r? Then you could ostensibly set a target date for the completion of the milestone. That would give everyone something to strive fo

Re: Status of magic-removal

2006-02-22 Thread Arthur
> I, for one, want to get m-r wrapped up and merged back to trunk as > soon as humanely possible. I feel like it's starting to be a drag on > new users trying to figure out why development on trunk seems to have > stopped, and I want to get us all back to one codebase. +1 Arthur --~--~

Re: Status of magic-removal

2006-02-21 Thread Nick Phillips
On 22/02/2006, at 12:34 PM, Luke Plant wrote: > > For now, if you have deadlines then trunk is the way to go (yep, bad > timing for that advice, sorry). While migration will be a bit of a > pain and tedious, it will at least be reasonably straightforward. > > Sorry for the difficulties you've ha

Re: Status of magic-removal

2006-02-21 Thread limodou
On 2/22/06, Luke Plant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 21 February 2006 22:57, Nick Phillips wrote: > > > "Bugger. NameError at /admin/foo/bar/person/1/delete/ > > global name 'ObjectDoesNotExist' is not defined. What have I let > > myself in for here? I mean, does anyone actually *run*

Re: Status of magic-removal

2006-02-21 Thread Luke Plant
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 22:57, Nick Phillips wrote: > "Bugger. NameError at /admin/foo/bar/person/1/delete/ > global name 'ObjectDoesNotExist' is not defined. What have I let > myself in for here? I mean, does anyone actually *run* this magic- > removal stuff?" > > > If it weren't for the fac

Re: Status of magic-removal

2006-02-21 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On 2/22/06, Luke Plant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - #1346 (and probably others)A quick heads up - I've been working on this one, and I've almost got it sorted out. Russ Magee %-) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl

Re: Status of magic-removal

2006-02-21 Thread Nick Phillips
On 22/02/2006, at 10:58 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > > I, for one, want to get m-r wrapped up and merged back to trunk as > soon as humanely possible. I feel like it's starting to be a drag on > new users trying to figure out why development on trunk seems to have > stopped, and I want to get u

Re: Status of magic-removal

2006-02-21 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On Feb 21, 2006, at 3:33 PM, gabor wrote: > http://wiki.python.org/moin/PyCon2006/Sprints/DjangoSprint > > unfortunately no trace of magic-removal :( That's really only a rough guide. I'd hoped that magic-removal would be mostly done by PyCon, but as that won't happen chances are much of PyC

Re: Status of magic-removal

2006-02-21 Thread gabor
Luke Plant wrote: > > Also, Jacob is doing Django sprint at PyCon AFAIK, which might affect > all this. I'm not sure whether Jacob was planning on working on > magic-removal or trunk. http://wiki.python.org/moin/PyCon2006/Sprints/DjangoSprint unfortunately no trace of magic-removal :( gabor

Re: Status of magic-removal

2006-02-21 Thread Luke Plant
Hi Christopher, I'll speak out of turn here and say I how see things from my limited experience with the project/code. > Other issues include the broken content-types stuff (#1280... why's > that patch not checked in yet?) There hasn't been that much activity on magic-removal for the past few

Status of magic-removal

2006-02-21 Thread Christopher Lenz
Hey folks, We've just started a new project here with Django and decided to build it on top of the magic-removal branch, since the project is going to be worked on for a couple of months. Now, actually using the magic-removal is currently raising more problems than I had hoped. I've been l