On 2/23/06, Christopher Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To an outsider like myself, it looks like there's been a rush towards
> a major refactoring that (pretty much) stopped somewhere along half
> the way, leaving quite a number of those features that make Django
> such a great framework non-functional. And there's no documentation
> (and only sparse archived discussion) about how the currently broken
> functionality should be fixed... otherwise I'd have contributed a
> good share of patches by now.
>
> IMHO, what the Django community needs at this point is for someone in
> the know to update the RemovingTheMagic page, and add meat to the
> "What's not done yet" section. Limit the scope of the branch, point
> out what areas need fixing and how those are supposed to be
> approached. I'm sure the "masterplan" is somewhere in the heads of
> the developers, but it needs to be communicated to users and
> potential contributors if we are to test and contribute to the branch.

Hey Chris,

Yeah, development has slowed down a bit for a variety of reasons --
mostly time and other distractions. But I appreciate your bringing
this up: We should do a better job of communicating the status. I'll
update the RemovingTheMagic wiki page with the latest status.

Adrian

--
Adrian Holovaty
holovaty.com | djangoproject.com | chicagocrime.org

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to