Am 21.02.2006 um 22:58 schrieb Jacob Kaplan-Moss:
> I, for one, want to get m-r wrapped up and merged back to trunk as
> soon as humanely possible.  I feel like it's starting to be a drag on
> new users trying to figure out why development on trunk seems to have
> stopped, and I want to get us all back to one codebase.

I agree 100% with that goal... but I'm curious on how you want to get  
there. In its current state, magic-removal is severely broken in many  
significant ways. Don't get me wrong, I'm a big fan of the general  
direction of the branch... the "magic modules" part of Django was  
really a turnoff for me before.

To an outsider like myself, it looks like there's been a rush towards  
a major refactoring that (pretty much) stopped somewhere along half  
the way, leaving quite a number of those features that make Django  
such a great framework non-functional. And there's no documentation  
(and only sparse archived discussion) about how the currently broken  
functionality should be fixed... otherwise I'd have contributed a  
good share of patches by now.

IMHO, what the Django community needs at this point is for someone in  
the know to update the RemovingTheMagic page, and add meat to the  
"What's not done yet" section. Limit the scope of the branch, point  
out what areas need fixing and how those are supposed to be  
approached. I'm sure the "masterplan" is somewhere in the heads of  
the developers, but it needs to be communicated to users and  
potential contributors if we are to test and contribute to the branch.

Cheers,
Chris
--
Christopher Lenz
   cmlenz at gmx.de
   http://www.cmlenz.net/


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to