, Chris Johns wrote:
>
>> On 03/04/2018 02:10, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>> > Sure if you want to crack at it.
>> >
>> > If you pull the ini-update branch again, I've included the other files
>> you'll need.
>> >
>> > Now if you
On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 11:18 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> I got the rtems-test running
>
> I found that get_item_names(section, err) in configuration.py was
> returning an empty list to the
> item_names in load(bsp,opts) for config.py this was giving out the error
> mandatory item not found .
>
>
gt;> return opts.defaults['bsp']
>>>> File
>>>> "/home/lunatic/development/rtems/rtems-tools/rtemstoolkit/macros.py", line
>>>> 190, in __getitem__
>>>> raise IndexError('key: %s' % (key))
>>>> In
b.com/AdaCore/qemu
>
> I guess this is regular qemu , please send a link for couverture qemu for
> manual build.
>
> -- vijay
>
> On 12 April 2018 at 22:23, Cillian O'Donnell
> wrote:
>
>> Ah that's good progress, those .cov files are supposed to be generate
>
> On 13 April 2018 at 11:43, Cillian O'Donnell
> wrote:
>
>> No that's the right one. I think it might be something to do with
>> qemu.cfg in rtems-tools then. What's in your qemu.cfg? It's in
>> rtems-tools/tester/rtems/testing
>>
>> On F
> %define bsp_qemu_opts %{nil}
> %endif
> %define qemu_cmd qemu-system-%{bsp_arch}
> %define qemu_opts %{bsp_qemu_opts}
>
> #
> # Executable
> #
> %execute %{qemu_cmd} %{qemu_opts} -kernel %{test_executable}
>
> -- vijay
>
> On 13 April 2018 at 22:19, Cilli
%if %{coverage_supported}
> error: qemu.cfg:77: macro '%{coverage_supported}' not found
> warning: switched to dry run due to errors
> error: qemu.cfg:77: invalid if bool value: %if %{coverage_supported}
>
>
>
> -- vijay
>
> On 13 April 2018 at 22:54, Cillian O'Donnell
gt;>> tst.reraise()
>>> File
>>> "/home/lunatic/development/rtems/test/rtems-tools/tester/rt/test.py", line
>>> 160, in reraise
>>> _test_reraise(*self.result)
>>> NameError: global name '_test_reraise' is not defined
>&g
Is there anywhere in that output that it shows the qemu command that is
running?
On Fri, 13 Apr 2018, 19:02 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
>
> -- vijay
>
> On 13 April 2018 at 23:29, Cillian O'Donnell
> wrote:
>
>> I can't say for certain but I don't th
e/lunatic/d
> evelopment/rtems/kernel/leon3/sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites/samples/hello/hello.exe
> 26 WARNING: Unable to read coverage file
> /home/lunatic/development/rtems/kernel/leon3/sparc-rt
> ems5/c/leon3/testsuites/samples/hello/hello.exe.cov
>
>1,1 Top
>
&
; is not defined
>>
>>
> The reraise logic was moved to the rtemstoolkit last year:
>
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/commit/?id=fa81491764861e6
> 3785a3faa241c488469087209
>
> It had some issues that have been fixed and it is being reused else where
> in the tester.
>
>
>&g
Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 14 April 2018 at 16:42, Cillian O'Donnell
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14 April 2018 at 07:11, Chris Johns wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 14/4/18 8:02 am, Vijay Kumar Banerj
On 15 April 2018 at 06:46, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
>
>
> On 15 April 2018 at 01:45, Cillian O'Donnell
> wrote:
>
>> Switch one of these lines out in qemu.cfg.
>>
>> #%define qemu_opts_base -no-reboot -monitor none -serial stdio -nographic
>> #%d
Not sure what's happening there. Send me a link to your github branch.
On 15 April 2018 at 09:35, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
>
>
> On 15 April 2018 at 14:02, Cillian O'Donnell
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 15 April 2018 at 06:46, Vijay Kumar Banerjee >
On 15 April 2018 at 10:09, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
> Not sure what's happening there. Send me a link to your github branch.
>
> On 15 April 2018 at 09:35, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 15 April 2018 at 14:02, Cillian O'Donnell
&g
is time I'm not sure because we haven't changed anything like
that. If I think of any clues, I'll let you know.
On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, 05:36 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
>
>
> On 15 April 2018 at 15:33, Cillian O'Donnell
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On
output that will give me an idea of what it should
> look like ?
>
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, 11:13 Cillian O'Donnell,
> wrote:
>
>> Probably what'll happen is, when the reports are generating properly,
>> Chris will review the changes and come up with a list
to look into covoar.
>> Do you have any sample output that will give me an idea of what it should
>> look like ?
>>
>> On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, 11:13 Cillian O'Donnell,
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Probably what'll happen is, when the reports are generating prop
On 16 April 2018 at 17:46, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 2:33 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> current status :
>> the coverage is running now with rtems-test and generating the report,
>> however, the report doesn't show any data.
>>
>
> I'v
Banerjee,
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, 03:19 Joel Sherrill, wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17 April 2018 at 01:43, Cilli
Also if there's any file in covoar directory of coverage-merge branch
that's called symbol-set.c symbol_set_reader.h or any variation of that,
that you don't already have pull all of them into your current branch.
On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, 07:19 Cillian O'Donnell, wrote:
> Som
/sparc-rtems5/c/
>> leon3/testsuites/samples/base_sp/base_sp.exe/60)
>>
>> INFO: DesiredSymbols::mergeCoverageMap - Unable to merge coverage map
>> for _Workspace_Allocate_or_fatal_error because the sizes are different
>>
>> Am I still possibly missing somethi
the
> generated code more closely match the source.
>
> I suppose the next step is to work to get Cillian's updated work merged.
>
> Then for me to try to duplicate the results.
>
> FWIW I am teaching an RTEMS class next week and won't be around as much.
>
> -
patches up a bit more, I'm just trying to give everyone a look at
what I have locally here. I'm not sure how much of this is superfluous
with Chris's propesed changes but its a starting point for us to see
what we want to do with all this.***
Cillian O'Donnell (2):
covoar: A
Co-author: Krzysztof Miesowicz
Co-author: Vijay Kumar Banerjee
---
tester/rtems/testing/bsps/leon3_qemu.ini | 52 ++
tester/rtems/testing/coverage.ini | 49 +
tester/rtems/testing/coverage/Categories.txt | 19 ++
tester/rtems/testing/coverage/Explanati
Add ability to organize symbol sets of libraries in symbol_set.cfg
and then read them with covoar (Krzysztof Miesowicz))
Also the symbols are now loaded in from ELF data rather than relying
on nm.(Cillian O'Donnell)
Co-author:"Krzysztof Miesowicz "
---
tester/covoar/SymbolSet.
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018, 03:27 Chris Johns, wrote:
> On 26/04/2018 06:33, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
> > *** ALright so here is everything that exists locally for covoar that
> > was never merged. It amounts to the symbol set reader and the ability
> > to load the symbols
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, 04:48 Chris Johns, wrote:
> On 27/04/2018 08:51, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> >// Create the set of desired symbols.
> >SymbolsToAnalyze = new Coverage::DesiredSymbols();
> > - SymbolsToAnalyze->load( symbolsFile );
> >
> >
> > I am having trouble seeing wh
The .css file is a support file for the output.
>
> Not sure where the else fall but these seems like a handful of small
> patches
> rather than one larger patch.
>
> --joel
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 3:33 PM, Cillian O'Donnell
> wrote:
>
>>
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, 08:32 Chris Johns, wrote:
> On 27/04/2018 17:21, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, 04:48 Chris Johns, > <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote:
> >
> > On 27/04/2018 08:51, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > >
> &
On 26 April 2018 at 08:50, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 26/04/2018 16:11, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Apr 2018, 03:27 Chris Johns, > <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote:
> >
> >> Also, are there any RSB changes outstanding to build a suitable QEMU
On 28 April 2018 at 01:25, Chris Johns wrote:
>
>
> On 28/4/18 7:41 am, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 26 April 2018 at 08:50, Chris Johns > <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote:
> >
> > On 26/04/2018 16:11, Cillian O'Do
---
source-builder/config/couverture-qemu-2-1.cfg | 104 ++
1 file changed, 104 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 source-builder/config/couverture-qemu-2-1.cfg
diff --git a/source-builder/config/couverture-qemu-2-1.cfg
b/source-builder/config/couverture-qemu-2-1.cfg
new f
---
bare/config/devel/couverture-qemu.bset | 25 +
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 bare/config/devel/couverture-qemu.bset
diff --git a/bare/config/devel/couverture-qemu.bset
b/bare/config/devel/couverture-qemu.bset
new file mode 100644
index 000..
---
bare/config/devel/couverture-qemu-git-1.cfg | 32 +
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 bare/config/devel/couverture-qemu-git-1.cfg
diff --git a/bare/config/devel/couverture-qemu-git-1.cfg
b/bare/config/devel/couverture-qemu-git-1.cfg
new file mod
On 28 April 2018 at 08:08, Chris Johns wrote:
> From: Cillian O'Donnell
>
> Add ability to organize symbol sets of libraries in INI file
> and then read them with covoar and load the symbols directly from the
> libraries.
>
> rtems-tools/../testing: Add configuration f
; File "/home/lunatic/development/rtems/test/rtems-tools/tester/wscript",
> line 35, in recurse
> ctx.recurse(sd)
> File "/home/lunatic/development/rtems/test/rtems-tools/.waf-1.9.9-
> 75529a659e4f06cb4254801e52405e0a/waflib/Context.py", line 129, in recurse
>
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, 20:39 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
>
> This is the log file that I'm getting after running the test
>
> I'm getting a lot of 'invalid' results , am I missing something ?
>
What we had in coverage.py and test.py will need to be updated with Chris'
change to covoar. It's prob
On 28 April 2018 at 08:08, Chris Johns wrote:
> From: Cillian O'Donnell
>
> Add ability to organize symbol sets of libraries in INI file
> and then read them with covoar and load the symbols directly from the
> libraries.
>
> rtems-tools/../testing: Add configuration f
On Sun, 29 Apr 2018, 23:30 Chris Johns, wrote:
> On 29/04/2018 20:50, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
> > On 28 April 2018 at 08:08, Chris Johns > <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote:
> > + for (const std::string set : sets) {
> > +if
On Tue, 1 May 2018, 00:52 Chris Johns, wrote:
> On 28/04/2018 20:18, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
> > ---
> > source-builder/config/couverture-qemu-2-1.cfg | 104
> ++
>
> Why a new file? Could the existing qemu config be used?
>
We were thin
On Thu, 3 May 2018, 16:23 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to ask some things about the project to get a clear understanding
> of the objectives/milestones and current status of the project. I also seek
> advice on my Tasks/obectives.
>
> 1. The covoar has been updated to read sym
On Fri, 4 May 2018, 01:15 Chris Johns, wrote:
> On 04/05/2018 09:04, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com
> > <mailto:vijaykumar9...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > On 3 May 2018 at 22:58, Cilli
On Fri, 4 May 2018, 00:04 Joel Sherrill, wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 3 May 2018 at 22:58, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu,
On Fri, 4 May 2018, 07:51 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 4 May 2018, 12:17 Cillian O'Donnell,
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 4 May 2018, 00:04 Joel Sherrill, wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 3, 2018
Hi Chris,
Getting some build errors here. It complains about dwarf.h and libdwarf.h
so theres 2 packages that I can get them from but both end up producing
some problems. 'Elf' has a previous declaration in one and missing typedef
for the other. Is there a particular version of these libraries tha
On 5 May 2018 at 21:12, Chris Johns wrote:
>
>
> > On 6 May 2018, at 2:44 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> > Looks similar to Cillian's failure. Chris will have to show me where
> libdwarf comes from. It needs to be supplied with RTEMS tools for
> consistency.
>
> You need to apply the patches aga
Yeah I'm seeing the same as Joel, at least were further then we were :).
I've been mostly working on the rtems-tester support, so just to give an
update. I spent all day Saturday and today on it. It's taking longer than
expected, re-orienting myself and deciding what is needed and not needed
now w
oel Sherrill wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 7 May 2018, 22:57 Cillian O'Donnell,
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yeah I&#
Here's the branch with work in progress for the tester. Have a look when
you can Vijay.
https://github.com/cillianodonnell/rtems-tools/tree/tester-support
On 7 May 2018 at 19:59, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>
> On 7 May 2018 at 18:56, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>>
fo
(this=0x6bc3c0,
theExecutableName=, theLibraryName=0x0)
at ../tester/covoar/ExecutableInfo.cc:33
#15 0x004054b6 in main (argc=, argv=)
at ../tester/covoar/covoar.cc:330
On 7 May 2018 at 20:03, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 1:59 PM, Cillian O'Donnell
&
ossibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==20928==still reachable: 6,603,039 bytes in 39,760 blocks
==20928== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==20928== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==20928==
==20928== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==2092
Just running covoar there, we seem to be running into some problems at the
source line lookup stage
cpod@cpod ~/development/rtems/leon3 $ covoar -S
/home/cpod/development/rtems/test/rtems-tools/tester/rtems/testing/coverage/score-symbols.ini
-O /home/cpod/coverage_test/test/score
-E/home/cpod/deve
On Thu, 10 May 2018, 03:43 Chris Johns, wrote:
> On 10/5/18 8:47 am, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
> > Just running covoar there, we seem to be running into some problems at
> the
> > source line lookup stage
>
> Thank you for testing this. I assume it builds OK and we
On Thu, 10 May 2018, 16:01 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
>
>
> On 8 May 2018 at 00:33, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>> Here's the branch with work in progress for the tester. Have a look when
>> you can Vijay.
>>
>> https://github.com/cillianodonnell
On Thu, 10 May 2018, 11:48 Chris Johns, wrote:
> On 10/5/18 2:43 pm, Chris Johns wrote:
> > On 10/5/18 8:47 am, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> GDB
> >>
> >>
> >> (gdb) bt
>
On 10 May 2018 at 19:39, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 11/5/18 5:37 am, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 May 2018, 11:48 Chris Johns, >
> > It is not a exception in an exception or in a stack unwind path, it
> is an
> > exception being thrown with no cat
is is doing now, we can keep an eye on what's happening and help
with testing but we won't need to wait for it to move forward. So getting
the tester to run covoar is separate and we can crack on with that.
>
>
> On 10 May 2018 at 23:40, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>> On Thu,
On Thu, 10 May 2018, 22:23 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 11 May 2018, 02:19 Cillian O'Donnell,
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 10 May 2018 at 20:15, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Frankly, I'm totally confused at th
On Fri, 11 May 2018, 06:17 Chris Johns, wrote:
> On 11/5/18 4:44 pm, Chris Johns wrote:
> >
> > I am looking into the reason for the error which is proving difficult to
> find.
> >
>
> Cillian, could you please compress and email me offlist the ELF file for
> the cov
> file is for?
>
Will do. It
Ah NZ almost exact opposite sides of the world, that worked out nicely.
On Fri, 11 May 2018, 07:54 Chris Johns, wrote:
>
> On 11 May 2018, at 6:21 pm, Cillian O'Donnell
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 11 May 2018, 06:17 Chris Johns, wrote:
>
>> On 11/5/18 4:44 pm
It does seem to be having some knock on effect. Covoar made it past these
checks before.
-
Total: 13
Average test time: 0:00:03.178923
Testing time : 0:00:41.326000
Running covoar for score
covoar results directory:
/home/cpod/development/rtems/leon3/coverage/score
ERRO
t;
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018, 16:09 Cillian O'Donnell,
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It does seem to be having some knock on effect. Covoar made it past
>>>> these checks befo
but that's just collaborative development, you'll have to get
used to it :)...
On 13 May 2018 at 12:39, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 13 May 2018, 17:02 Cillian O'Donnell,
> wrote:
>
>> But you see the thing is that if you remove the changes you m
On 13 May 2018 at 13:35, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 13 May 2018, 17:32 Cillian O'Donnell,
> wrote:
>
>> I understand but that's a separate issue. I can do a full coverage run
>> from the top of the build tree by changing hello.exe.cov to hello.co
On 13 May 2018 at 13:47, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 13 May 2018, 18:14 Cillian O'Donnell,
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 13 May 2018 at 13:35, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018, 17:32 Cillian O
=leon3-qemu-cov --coverage
$HOME/development/rtems/leon3/sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites/samples
On 13 May 2018 at 13:58, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 13 May 2018, 18:24 Cillian O'Donnell,
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 13 May 2018 at 13:47, Vijay Kumar
On 13 May 2018 at 16:32, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
> On 13 May 2018 at 19:00, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>> Is there supposed to be a message there?
>>
>> Anyway just to clear this up, try this for me.
>>
>> 1. Grab a new branch of
>>
>>
---
tester/covoar/covoar.cc | 10 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tester/covoar/covoar.cc b/tester/covoar/covoar.cc
index 5c87402..c6b0589 100644
--- a/tester/covoar/covoar.cc
+++ b/tester/covoar/covoar.cc
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static void createBuildPath(Execu
On Sun, 13 May 2018, 22:15 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> On 14 May 2018 at 02:15, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>> ---
>> tester/covoar/covoar.cc | 10 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tester/covoar/cov
On Mon, 14 May 2018, 16:46 Joel Sherrill, wrote:
> I'll commit this once there is a log message. :)
>
You want the word 'Fix' is it?... :)
>
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Cillian O'Donnell
> wrote:
>
>> ---
>> tester/covoar/covoar.c
On Mon, 14 May 2018, 09:50 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> On 14 May 2018 at 12:10, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 13 May 2018, 22:15 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 14 May 2018 at 02:15,
---
tester/covoar/covoar.cc | 10 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tester/covoar/covoar.cc b/tester/covoar/covoar.cc
index 5c87402..c6b0589 100644
--- a/tester/covoar/covoar.cc
+++ b/tester/covoar/covoar.cc
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static void createBuildPath(Execu
On Thu, 17 May 2018, 21:32 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> hello,
>
> I have attached the html report !
>
Report looks good! Well done. Was that just for samples. Did the other
sections appear in the report if you click through the links?
Well it looks good but I hardcoded the paths, at least th
On Fri, 18 May 2018, 07:46 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2018, 11:52 Cillian O'Donnell,
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 17 May 2018, 21:32 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> hello,
>>&g
On Fri, 18 May 2018, 12:36 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
>
> On 18 May 2018 at 12:30, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>
>> Cool, you should run it for the full testsuite and take a look at that
>> report (takes a while.. around 575 tests)
>>
>>>
>>>
On Fri, 18 May 2018, 14:55 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
>
>
> On 18 May 2018 at 19:09, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 18 May 2018, 12:36 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> O
, 19 May 2018, 03:06 Joel Sherrill, wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
>>>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 19 May 2018 at 02:29, Vijay Kumar Ban
On Sat, 19 May 2018, 12:28 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> On 19 May 2018 at 16:47, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>>
>> God these messages again... at least I'm an expert in fixing these :)
>> Vijay I'm only seeing the headings in the report on my end using
On Sat, 19 May 2018, 13:28 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> On 19 May 2018 at 17:56, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> wrote:
>
>> On 19 May 2018 at 17:50, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 May 2018 at 17:44, Cillian O'Donnell
>>> wrote:
>>
It works.. Sorry I was using the right covoar but the wrong rtems-test. Ahh
its nice to see the data back in the reports again. Did you manage to track
down 2 exes with the mismatch in symbol size?
On 19 May 2018 at 13:59, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
> On 19 May 2018 at 18:28, Cillian O'
On Sat, 19 May 2018, 20:59 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My end sem exams are starting next week from 22nd May and will go till
> 31st May. During this period I will be less efficient.
> I understand that the project is in a crucial state and 10 days of
> inactivity is unacceptable so
On Sun, 20 May 2018, 15:35 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> On 20 May 2018 at 00:53, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 20 May 2018, 00:45 Cillian O'Donnell,
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It works.. Sorry I was using the right covoar but t
On Sun, 20 May 2018, 22:33 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> On 21 May 2018 at 02:29, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 20 May 2018, 15:35 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 20 May 2018 at 00:53
On Mon, 21 May 2018, 11:49 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> On 21 May 2018 at 11:56, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 20 May 2018, 22:33 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 21 May 2018 at 02:29,
On Mon, 21 May 2018, 12:08 Cillian O'Donnell, wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 21 May 2018, 11:49 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
> wrote:
>
>> On 21 May 2018 at 11:56, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 20 May 2018, 22:33 Vijay Kumar Ban
On Mon, 21 May 2018, 12:18 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> On 21 May 2018 at 16:39, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 21 May 2018, 12:08 Cillian O'Donnell,
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 21 May 2018, 11:49 Vi
samples/fileio/fileio.exe/84 !=
> /home/lunatic/development/rtems/kernel/leon3/sparc-
> rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites/samples/base_sp/base_sp.exe/60)
> =
>
>
>> I have never seen a case where the code matched by hand and covoar messed
>&g
On Sun, 27 May 2018, 19:59 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The support for letting users input specific symbols
> for coverage analysis is now working in my
> cov-tester-support branch
>
> https://github.com/thelunatic/rtems-tools/tree/cov-tester-support
>
Brilliant Vijay, I'll take a
On Wed, 30 May 2018, 16:58 Gedare Bloom, wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> wrote:
> > On 30 May 2018 at 20:18, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello Vijay,
> >>
> >> Do you expect/need an answer to something in here?
> >>
> >> gedare
> >>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I wante
On Wed, 30 May 2018, 18:15 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 30 May 2018, 22:42 Cillian O'Donnell,
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 30 May 2018, 16:58 Gedare Bloom, wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
&g
On Wed, 30 May 2018, 18:21 Gedare Bloom, wrote:
> Please provide your name in your commits (git config --user.name "My
> Name") that you submit.
>
> The first line of this commit, and therefore the email subject, is
> overly vague. Provide a slightly more specific description.
>
> On Wed, May 30,
On Wed, 30 May 2018, 18:54 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> On 30 May 2018 at 22:51, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
>> Please provide your name in your commits (git config --user.name "My
>> Name") that you submit.
>>
>> OK Noted :)
>
>> The first line of this commit, and therefore the email subject, is
>>
On 31 May 2018 at 19:07, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
> Add support in tester to run covoar and generate an html report to display
> the summary of the coverage reports generated from covoar.
>
> Co-authored-by : Cillian O'Donnell
> ---
> tester/rt/coverage.py
;> wrote:
>> > On 1 June 2018 at 01:07, Cillian O'Donnell
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 31 May 2018 at 19:07, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >&g
Thu, 31 May 2018, 21:29 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> On 1 June 2018 at 01:57, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>> So is it checking whether it's --coverage or --coverage=set1,set2? Are
>> those the 2 possibilities your checking?
>>
>> Yes, right. :)
>
>>
On Thu, 31 May 2018, 22:03 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> On 1 June 2018 at 02:14, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>> There is now a seperate bsp config for coverage, leon3-qemu-cov. That is
>> enough to trigger coverage now and --coverage could be reserved for picking
>&
On 4 June 2018 at 19:03, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
> On 2 June 2018 at 01:00, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> wrote:
>
>> On 2 June 2018 at 00:48, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 11:21 AM Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
>>> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
On 1 June 2018 at 20
ve, and then create a master index.html for listing all the
>>> report htmls.
>>>
>>
>> A single run of the tester will test a single BSP. If you open two shell
>> windows
>> and run the tester in both, will those collide?
>>
>> In it's cur
On Mon, 4 Jun 2018, 21:20 Vijay Kumar Banerjee,
wrote:
> On 5 June 2018 at 01:28, Cillian O'Donnell wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 4 June 2018 at 20:29, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5 June 2018 at 00:51, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
