On 13 May 2018 at 16:32, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 13 May 2018 at 19:00, Cillian O'Donnell <cpodonne...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Is there supposed to be a message there? >> >> Anyway just to clear this up, try this for me. >> >> 1. Grab a new branch of >> >> https://github.com/cillianodonnell/rtems-tools/tree/tester-support >> >> which is the current master plus one patch with the tester support in >> progress. >> >> 2. Apply your patch to that and make no other changes. >> >> 3. Build covoar again. >> >> 3. Run the tester from the top of the build tree and tell me what you see. >> >> cpod@cpod ~/development/rtems/leon3 $ >> $HOME/development/rtems/test/rtems-tools/tester/rtems-test >> --rtems-tools=$HOME/development/rtems/5 --log=coverage-analysis.log >> --rtems-bsp=leon3-qemu-cov --coverage $HOME/development/rtems/leon3/ >> sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites/samples >> >> Yes it's breaking . > when used with a single executable say unlimited.exe , it works but when > it's run with samples/ it returns the error : > executable build prefix does not match : sparc-rtems5 > Yeah that's the one I'm seeing. Right so the difference is actually single or multiple executables. Interesting... > > That's strange . > I think it has something to do with the parsing of the path from the ini > file. >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
