On Sun, 20 May 2018, 15:35 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, <vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 20 May 2018 at 00:53, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, 20 May 2018, 00:45 Cillian O'Donnell, <cpodonne...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> It works.. Sorry I was using the right covoar but the wrong rtems-test. >>> Ahh its nice to see the data back in the reports again. Did you manage to >>> track down 2 exes with the mismatch in symbol size? >>> >> Great! so next is the parsing of the symbol file. >> I couldn't manage to track down the mismatch. >> >> I have pushed these to my master branch. > > The latest update to cov-tester-support branch (please have a look) > parses the symbol-set ini file from the coverage script. The parsing > is working but currently it's not generating reports, as covoar > needs to be updated . > It's best if covoar reads it's own config file, otherwise it creates a dependency on the tester. Scanning over the recent changes to covoar there, it looks like it can already handle multiple sets, so the one ini with multiple sets in it is the way to go. > Here are the things that I have done and that needs to be > done in order to generate reports : > > I have added a symbol-sets.ini file and parsed it from the coverage script > this is how it works : > > > - The ini file can be updated with all the symbols, separated by ' , ' > (comma) > > This is the way covoar is actually handling it now. You should test a multi set ini and see if that's working. > > - > - The coverages splits them and makes a list of all the sets > - The respective libraries are parsed from the libraries section. > - It returns a dict with all the symbols and thir resp. library > addresses. > - The library addresses are absolute so it can be run from anywhere > top of build tree is not necessary. > > This was a good idea but it's just that dependency issue we want to stay away from. Covoar has something to find the build directory too, it just hasn't been connected up yet, so running it from the top of the build directory is ok for the moment. Probably the most pressing thing now is investigating those mismatch in symbol size. > This way we can parse all the symbols from the same ini file. > > what needs to be done : > > - I have added #FIXME s in the code , those are the small fixes that > would be needed . > - The covoar needs to be updated. My proposal is that we can feed the > parsed dict to the covoar instead of feeding the symbol file and > letting > covoar parse it ( As I mentioned previously). > > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
