On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, 20:39 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, <vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This is the log file that I'm getting after running the test > > I'm getting a lot of 'invalid' results , am I missing something ? > What we had in coverage.py and test.py will need to be updated with Chris' change to covoar. It's probably best not to run it with rtems-test until we've revised that. We'll just be testing covoar by itself for the moment. The focus will probably be on removing covoars dependency on external tools next. Chris will we pass in the score ini to -S option now and then the other options are picked up from there? (Excluding -p and -E). > > after this patch along with with the c++ cleanup patch, we have to start > working on parsing the coverage right? >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
