Re: GSOC proposal - new POSIX APIs 2024

Hi! Requesting comments on my proposal for GSOC 2024 - implementing new POSIX APIs: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iwgzx72TZ0aokNLww-y-IlyEkaRCovjGUhpdQXdP9mg/edit?usp=sharing Abhinav. -- *"Free society* *Has, at its core, privacy* *You must act in trust." - *Salyzyn

Re: GSOC Task

Thanks. Please add yourself to the table at https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2024 and (continue to) discuss your project ideas here/Discord. On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 2:10 PM Matheus Pecoraro wrote: > > Hello, I am a fresh graduate from Brazil. I have developed a simple > x86_64 kernel in Rust in

Re: GSoC Contributor Introduction: Integrating Renode to RTEMS

On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 7:46 AM Muhammad Sulthan Mazaya < msulthanmaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the feedback Joel, > > This is known to work. I think Alan Cudmore has reproduced this and there >> is some information on the web about this: >> https://antmicro.com/blog/2021/09/leon3-support-

Re: GSoC Contributor Introduction: Integrating Renode to RTEMS

Thanks for the feedback Joel, This is known to work. I think Alan Cudmore has reproduced this and there > is some information on the web about this: > https://antmicro.com/blog/2021/09/leon3-support-in-renode/ > I don't think you will be adding code to renode. I hope you will submit > documentatti

Re: GSoC Contributor Introduction: Integrating Renode to RTEMS

First, congratulations on being accepted. This project was my idea initially so I hope it is as fruitful to the community as I hope. Second, use the devel@ mailing list since that is where most of the developers are. Other comments inline. On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 4:06 AM Muhammad Sulthan Mazaya

Re: GSoC Hello World Test Completed

Good job! Add yourself to the table here: https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2023 Do you have any project in mind? The sparc/erc32 may or may not be the best BSP to do that on. --joel On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 10:07 AM Siddharth Khattar wrote: > Hello, > I've successfully completed the GSoC Hell

Re: GSoC project suggestion for the BSP Raspberry pi 4B aarch64

The Pynq is a low cost Zynq board I have wanted to have support for. http://www.pynq.io/board.html Basic support should be a matter of tweaking the settings and adding a bsp variant On Sat, Feb 25, 2023, 10:21 AM Alan Cudmore wrote: > Improving Raspberry Pi 4 support would be a great GSOC proj

Re: GSoC project suggestion for the BSP Raspberry pi 4B aarch64

Improving Raspberry Pi 4 support would be a great GSOC project. Right now the Beagleboard is my default for a low cost network enabled RTEMS board. But a Pi4 with network and SMP support would be a great board to learn RTEMS. Even better if the supply problems are addressed this year. In addition t

Re: GSoC project suggestion for the BSP Raspberry pi 4B aarch64

That's all great information to include in the ticket and/or the Users Guide. On Sun, Feb 19, 2023, 7:44 AM Noor Aman wrote: > I booted freeBSD on the Raspberry pi, I was able to confirm that it used > genet driver together with miibus for the NIC. This is further confirmed > with the FreeBSD

Re: GSoC project suggestion for the BSP Raspberry pi 4B aarch64

I booted freeBSD on the Raspberry pi, I was able to confirm that it used genet driver together with miibus for the NIC. This is further confirmed with the FreeBSD manual page. https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=genet One more thing to follow is that i noticed that FreeBSD is using PSCI, so

Re: GSoC project suggestion for the BSP Raspberry pi 4B aarch64

On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 11:09 AM Noor Aman wrote: > > Hey everyone, > Last year I helped with the porting of RTEMS-aarch64 for Raspberry Pi 4B > with Kinsey, Alan and Hesham. I'm looking forward to continuing my project > further. As of now, I have 2 projects in my mind. > Every GSoC project sho

Re: GSoC 2022:

Hi Christian, I created a patch (attached in the mail) for review, which has CAN support. Shall I send the patch for review to @rtems-de...@rtems.org ? Regards Prashanth S On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 10:03, Prashanth S wrote: > Hi Christian, > > This is to update the status. > > Yesterday, pushed

Re: [GSoC] Help needed for the continuation of project RPi4B

I verified that my RPi400 (RPi4 with keyboard) enables the console on UART 1, the "Mini UART" by default. (0xfe215040) If I add this line to config.txt on the SD card: dtoverlay=disable-bt The console comes up with the PL011 UART on the same pins (0xfe201000) So if you want to use the PL011 UART as

Re: [GSoC] Help needed for the continuation of project RPi4B

On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 11:13 AM Noor Aman wrote: > Hello, I wanted some help on my project and what do I need to do next. > Here is a summary of what I have done so far. > > TESTING > - Tested bare-metal from https://rpi4os.com, worked good > - (Suggested by Alan) Tested VxWorks from >

Re: GSoC 2022 - CAN API test

Hello Prashanth S and others, I am copying reply to the list for recrd and others consideration On Sunday 19 of June 2022 17:30:16 Christian Mauderer wrote: > Would that be a generic test for the CAN API that all BSPs can run? Or > would it be a hardware specific one? The CAN base test can be HW

Re: GSoC - CAN driver for BBB Was: CAN Options and Licensing, Testing, etc

Hello Prashanth, On Thursday 14 of April 2022 20:20:45 Prashanth S wrote: > This is to summarize the things suggested from the discussions and clarify > on CAN generic APIs. > > Things on the plate: > >- CAN driver for BBB. OK >- CAN driver for any one of the QEMU supported SoC (SJA1000 on

Re: GSoC: Hello World Patch

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 2:59 PM Kamlesh Bharodiya wrote: > Hi Joel, > > I had tried to run the program using integrated simulator with gdb. That > didn't work for me (need to figure out). > Hmm.. sis as integrated with gdb was disabled in favor of the more powerful standalone newer versions of s

Re: GSoC: Hello World Patch

Looks good. Email (or send it to me on Discord) a screenshot in gdb with that program. Then add yourself to https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2022 Feel free to discuss any projects you are interested in here or Discord. On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 1:10 PM Kamlesh Bharodiya wrote: > Hi, > > I woul

Re: GSoC-2022 Hello-World Project for BeagleBone Black

Congratulations! Send me and gedare@ your snapshot and diff privately or via Discord. You also need to add yourself to the table of interested folks https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2022 On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 10:39 AM Prashanth S wrote: > Hi All, > > This is to send the Hello-World Project

Re: [GSoC-Entry PATCH] RTEMS port for Raspberry pi 4 AArch64

Hi Mohd Noor Aman, Got it, thanks. Hopefully you can entice a mentor to express interest in the port :) That always helps. We'll get proposal preparation started in earnest soon. Gedare On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 9:28 PM Noor Aman wrote: > > Hello, This is my patch for qualifying the RTEMS GSoC pr

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

Hello everyone, I wrote the style checking tool and looking forward to some feedback to improve it... https://github.com/Idadelveloper/rtems-tools/blob/master/misc/tools/style.py On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, 5:07 pm Gedare Bloom, wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 3:21 PM Ida Delphine wrote: > > > > Hi e

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 3:21 PM Ida Delphine wrote: > > Hi everyone, > I was able to successfully build LLVM from source using "ninja" instead of > "make" after a couple of failed attempts because I kept running out of > resources. > > Is there anything else I am supposed to do as far building L

Re: GSOC 2021: USB Device Drivers - Beaglebone Black

Hello Kevin, I'm working on porting the CDC Serial device driver to beagle. (RTEMS is the device and Linux as host) I see you have ported USB Serial drivers some time back. I hope that you can help me clear my doubts. In your case how did you use a USB Serial adapter and how did you start a shell

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

Hi everyone, I was able to successfully build LLVM from source using "ninja" instead of "make" after a couple of failed attempts because I kept running out of resources. Is there anything else I am supposed to do as far building LLVM is concerned? Or will every user first have to clone the llvm re

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

Hi, I will bring the discussion to the devel list and I hope the comments are in line with the purpose of the project. Please correct what I say if it is not. The pre-commit script that is in github review is a good base and I believe it solves that problem for those on Linux. It is a great start

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

I will check on this On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 3:39 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 5:19 AM Ida Delphine wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > From the discussion on discord it looks like clang-format cannot be > installed on MacOS and FreeBSD. Is there any alternative or way to hav

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 5:19 AM Ida Delphine wrote: > > Hello everyone, > From the discussion on discord it looks like clang-format cannot be installed > on MacOS and FreeBSD. Is there any alternative or way to have it on these > operating systems? > What are the challenges with them? Can clang-

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

Hello everyone, >From the discussion on discord it looks like clang-format cannot be installed on MacOS and FreeBSD. Is there any alternative or way to have it on these operating systems? On Wed, 5 May 2021, 10:21 pm Ida Delphine, wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Regarding this project (https://deve

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

Hello, What I did was copy and paste the script into my local rtems/.git/hooks/pre-commit file, intentionally made some wrong style changes in some files and tried making a commit. I have documented how it works here https://github.com/Idadelveloper/rtems-docs/commit/a30407e159726ce745df7ab4813c5b3

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

Hello Ida, It would be great if you make a README.md at https://github.com/Idadelveloper/rtems/tree/master/hooks to guide potential users how to use your pre-commit hook and provide some examples. I tried to find the information from your blog, but the update stopped at the second week (https://i

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

Hello Ida, On 10/07/2021 01:08, Ida Delphine wrote: I added the functionality for my script to ignore certain directories like /bsps/, /testsuites/, '/cpukit/zlib', '/cpukit/mghttpd'. https://github.com/Idadelveloper/rtems/blob/master/hooks/pre-commit

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

Hello everyone, I added the functionality for my script to ignore certain directories like /bsps/, /testsuites/, '/cpukit/zlib', '/cpukit/mghttpd'. https://github.com/Idadelveloper/rtems/blob/master/hooks/pre-commit Are there any extra directories I should exclude? Also open to more suggestions an

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

Hello mentors, I got some feedback and I have improved my code based on it - https://github.com/Idadelveloper/rtems/blob/master/hooks/pre-commit Will love to get some more feedback and ways to make it look better. And is it okay I start working on its documentation though it hasn't been approved y

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

Thank you. I will make changes accordingly. On Thu, 1 Jul 2021, 5:31 pm Gedare Bloom, wrote: > Hi Ida, > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 1:11 PM Ida Delphine wrote: > > > > Hello mentors, > > > > Here is the code for my pre-commit hook script. How it works is by > default, upon commiting it outputs a

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

Hi Ida, On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 1:11 PM Ida Delphine wrote: > > Hello mentors, > > Here is the code for my pre-commit hook script. How it works is by default, > upon commiting it outputs a warning stating the number of style issues in > case there are mismatches. > The user can trigger the stri

Re: GSOC: Adding all generated changes in patch to RSB?

> Once it's set, If I'm not rebuilding the toolset, I'd guess I go > straight to steps 2.5, 2.6 in the quick-start guide? I'm sorry, I should have been more specific...I meant 2.5 (Build a BSP) and 2.6 (Test a BSP) from the RTEMS quick-start? Thanks again! On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 7:21 PM Joel Sh

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

Hello mentors, Here is the code for my pre-commit hook script. How it works is by default, upon commiting it outputs a warning stating the number of style issues in case there are mismatches. The user can trigger the strict mode which gives a more detailed output of the style issues by running add

Re: GSOC: Adding all generated changes in patch to RSB?

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 11:55 AM Matthew Joyce wrote: > > Dr. Joel, > > Thanks! This made me re-read your discord workflow advice from last > week, and it brings me to another question...You wrote: > > "You don't have to rebuild the entire toolsuite at this point. Just > add a functional test for

Re: GSOC: Adding all generated changes in patch to RSB?

Dr. Joel, Thanks! This made me re-read your discord workflow advice from last week, and it brings me to another question...You wrote: "You don't have to rebuild the entire toolsuite at this point. Just add a functional test for sig2str.c to the testsuite (e.g. psxsigNN or similar based on existin

Re: GSOC: Adding all generated changes in patch to RSB?

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 8:07 AM Matthew Joyce wrote: > > Dear Mentors, > > I've implemented my new functions locally in Newlib, created basic > tests in RTEMS, now I want to add the patches to the RSB to test them. > > I think I understand that once I submit these patches to newlib, they > should

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 1:13 AM Ida Delphine wrote: > Hello everyone, > I updated the hooks script. About the modes, we have the default, "strict" > and "nonstrict" (couldn't think of better names). With the default mode, it > prints a warning specifying the number of style issues if any and abor

Re: GSoC POSIX Compliance: Can't Build RTEMS Tool Suite Anymore

Thanks for your note, Sir! I'll never get that day back, but I'm glad to be back on track now and have made a bit of progress. I made the change locally in libc/sys/signal.h to use the *__restrict. I then configured and (successfully!) built newlib for sparc-rtems6. I see the various build binarie

Re: GSoC POSIX Compliance: Can't Build RTEMS Tool Suite Anymore

On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 8:33 AM Matthew Joyce wrote: > Dear Mentors, > > I'm sorry to report that I've taken one step forward and three steps > back. Since last night, I'm having trouble building the RTEMS tool > suite at all. I keep getting the same error (attached). > > Steps I've taken to atte

Re: GSOC POSIX Compliance: Stuck trying to build Newlib

Ok, thanks! I'm about to sign off for dinner, but I'll send the patch (with disclaimer) tonight. So since the code fails to compile, I need to start making some changes. Do I need to rebuild the rtems tool chain each time? I'm averaging about 1.33 hours on that :-( . Is that where some of the sc

Re: GSOC POSIX Compliance: Stuck trying to build Newlib

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:37 AM Matthew Joyce wrote: > I hate to ask, but where should the build binaries be if "make all" > was actually successful? > For newlib, there should be various libc.a and libm.a files in the build directory. Use find to locate them: find . -name libc.a And use "nm"

Re: GSOC POSIX Compliance: Stuck trying to build Newlib

I hate to ask, but where should the build binaries be if "make all" was actually successful? Thanks! Matt On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 6:16 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > On 16-Jun-2021, at 9:27 PM, Matthew Joyce wrote: > > > > Hi Dr. Joel, > > > > I tried that in newlib/libc and there we

Re: GSOC POSIX Compliance: Stuck trying to build Newlib

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:16 AM Eshan Dhawan wrote: > Hi Matt, > > On 16-Jun-2021, at 9:27 PM, Matthew Joyce wrote: > > > > Hi Dr. Joel, > > > > I tried that in newlib/libc and there were at least no errors. > > (Nothing leading me to believe it was successful either!) > > > > However I still

Re: GSOC POSIX Compliance: Stuck trying to build Newlib

Hi Matt, > On 16-Jun-2021, at 9:27 PM, Matthew Joyce wrote: > > Hi Dr. Joel, > > I tried that in newlib/libc and there were at least no errors. > (Nothing leading me to believe it was successful either!) > > However I still got the same error when I sudo make install. > (sparc-rtems-ranlib: co

Re: GSOC POSIX Compliance: Stuck trying to build Newlib

Hi Dr. Joel, I used the following, based on Vaibhav's blog: $ export PATH=$HOME/development/rtems/6/bin:$PATH $ ../newlib-cygwin/configure --target=sparc-rtems6 --disable-shared --disable-nls --enable-werror --enable-newlib-supplied-syscalls --enable-interwork --enable-multilib --with-gnu-as --w

Re: GSOC POSIX Compliance: Stuck trying to build Newlib

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:57 AM Matthew Joyce wrote: > Hi Dr. Joel, > > I tried that in newlib/libc and there were at least no errors. > (Nothing leading me to believe it was successful either!) > > However I still got the same error when I sudo make install. > (sparc-rtems-ranlib: command not f

Re: GSOC POSIX Compliance: Stuck trying to build Newlib

Hi Dr. Joel, I tried that in newlib/libc and there were at least no errors. (Nothing leading me to believe it was successful either!) However I still got the same error when I sudo make install. (sparc-rtems-ranlib: command not found) (among others!) Thanks again! Sincerely, Matt On Wed, Ju

Re: GSOC POSIX Compliance: Stuck trying to build Newlib

Does adding --no-recursive and running it only from the directory you touched a build system file in help? It is regenerating a lot you don't want to touch anyway. --joel On Wed, Jun 16, 2021, 5:32 AM Matthew Joyce wrote: > Hi Eshan, > > Thanks very much for your follow up! Ok, I see now that

Re: GSOC POSIX Compliance: Stuck trying to build Newlib

Hi Eshan, Thanks very much for your follow up! Ok, I see now that if I go into development/newlib/newlib-cygwin/newlib and run autoreconf -fvi with the v2.69 using the PATH that Dr. Joel just showed, it starts to run. It always eventually exits with an error though. (please see attached .txt). I h

Re: GSOC POSIX Compliance: Stuck trying to build Newlib

Hi Vaibhav, Thanks very much for your note! Fantastic job on your blogs. I read the entry on managing the two versions of autoconf and have been trying to follow it carefully. Could you please see the attached txt file? I'm in development/newlib/newlib-cygwin. I get the error where it tells me t

Re: GSOC POSIX Compliance: Stuck trying to build Newlib

Hello Matthew, On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 12:58 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > @RTEMS_TOOLS_BIN@ should have been replaced with the real directory where > your RTEMS tools are located. Something like this: Exactly. I was wondering the same when I saw his output of 'echo $PATH'. Matthew, the newlib an

Re: GSOC POSIX Compliance: Stuck trying to build Newlib

@RTEMS_TOOLS_BIN@ should have been replaced with the real directory where your RTEMS tools are located. Something like this: $ export PATH=${HOME}/rtems-work/tools/6/bin:$PATH And to check you have the PATH right, do something like this: $ type sparc-rtems6-gcc sparc-rtems6-gcc is /home/joel/rte

Re: GSOC POSIX Compliance: Stuck trying to build Newlib

Hi matt It would work if run inside newlib instead of newlib-cygwin run command inside of ../newlib-cygwin/newlib instead of ../newlib-cygwin On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 10:59 PM Matthew Joyce wrote: > Ah, ok will do! Thank you for the tip. > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 7:17 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: >

Re: GSOC POSIX Compliance: Stuck trying to build Newlib

Ah, ok will do! Thank you for the tip. On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 7:17 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > Just a note, it's more efficient to capture your terminal dump into a > text file and attach that, rather than put a screenshot up. > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 11:14 AM Matthew Joyce wrote: > > > > Hi

Re: GSOC POSIX Compliance: Stuck trying to build Newlib

Just a note, it's more efficient to capture your terminal dump into a text file and attach that, rather than put a screenshot up. On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 11:14 AM Matthew Joyce wrote: > > Hi Gentlemen, > > Thanks very much for your quick replies! > > I just tried both, but perhaps I'm misinterpre

Re: GSOC POSIX Compliance: Stuck trying to build Newlib

Hi Gentlemen, Thanks very much for your quick replies! I just tried both, but perhaps I'm misinterpreting your suggestions. (Could you please see the attached commands / errors!) Eshan, I did see that link, but it wasn't clear to me what the solution was...Sorry! Sincerely, Matt On Tue, Jun

Re: GSOC POSIX Compliance: Stuck trying to build Newlib

Hi Matt, Try running the command with autoconf version 2.69 that's shipped with RTEMS in the rtems bin That works as well. Also From a quick google search this is what I found : https://superuser.com/questions/617872/cant-locate-autom4te-channeldefs-pm-in-inc-when-it-definitely-is-there On Tue, J

Re: GSOC POSIX Compliance: Stuck trying to build Newlib

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 10:42 AM Matthew Joyce wrote: > Hello Dr. Joel and Eshan, > > I have a patch ready to send to Newlib for the sig function prototypes > and STR2SIG_MAX. > > But to do that, I think I need to have Newlib built, which I must > still be doing wrong. The error that I am getting

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

Okay. I will do that. On Fri, 4 Jun 2021, 10:48 pm Gedare Bloom, wrote: > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 2:57 PM Ida Delphine wrote: > > > > Okay, I will take a look. > > > > Regarding me asking a question in the appropriate clang-format mailing > list should it be just regarding the parentheses and br

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 2:57 PM Ida Delphine wrote: > > Okay, I will take a look. > > Regarding me asking a question in the appropriate clang-format mailing list > should it be just regarding the parentheses and braces being aligned? > That would be the right question to ask, if you can't find a w

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

Okay, I will take a look. Regarding me asking a question in the appropriate clang-format mailing list should it be just regarding the parentheses and braces being aligned? On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 8:41 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 12:39 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> On Fri,

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 12:39 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 8:47 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 12:24 AM Ida Delphine wrote: > >> > >> Hello everyone, > >> > >> I applied the configuration Sebastian used and ran clang-format on > cpukit/score/src

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 8:47 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 12:24 AM Ida Delphine wrote: >> >> Hello everyone, >> >> I applied the configuration Sebastian used and ran clang-format on >> cpukit/score/src/threadqenque.c and so far these are the differences I could >> notic

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 12:24 AM Ida Delphine wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I applied the configuration Sebastian used and ran clang-format on > cpukit/score/src/threadqenque.c and so far these are the differences I > could notice... > Below are some example areas in the code you can spot the diffe

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

Hello everyone, I applied the configuration Sebastian used and ran clang-format on cpukit/score/src/threadqenque.c and so far these are the differences I could notice... Below are some example areas in the code you can spot the differences: - In line 68, the ")" at the end of the parameter lis

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 2:59 PM Ida Delphine wrote: > > Hi Gedare, > > With regards to your comment on discord on me looking for a tool that works > on both patches and source files, it turns out clang-format has that > functionality already. Here's what I found - > https://clang.llvm.org/docs/

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

Hi Gedare, With regards to your comment on discord on me looking for a tool that works on both patches and source files, it turns out clang-format has that functionality already. Here's what I found - https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormat.html#script-for-patch-reformatting Does it match what yo

Re: [GSoC 2021] Beagle BSP USB OTG Support

Hi, I tried the CDC Ethernet in FreeBSD. My Laptop detects an ethernet interface with an IPv6. I tried to ping the IPv6, but it didn't work . The serial and ethernet works. I'll check the mass storage. --Husni On Thu,

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 2:18 PM Ida Delphine wrote: > > Hello everyone, > Still waiting for some feedback :) > > Cheers, > Ida. > > On Mon, 10 May 2021, 5:59 am Ida Delphine, wrote: >> >> Hello everyone, >> Went through some previous emails and it turns out Sebastian already came up >> with a co

Re: [GSoC 2021] Beagle BSP USB OTG Support

Hi, I couldn't set up the JTAG using Launchpad as it requires some adapters. While discussing in the Element14 forum, it seems it would require a lot of work to set up JTAG us

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

Hello everyone, Still waiting for some feedback :) Cheers, Ida. On Mon, 10 May 2021, 5:59 am Ida Delphine, wrote: > Hello everyone, > Went through some previous emails and it turns out Sebastian already came > up with a configuration for clang format which works well for RTEMS except > for the

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

Hello everyone, Went through some previous emails and it turns out Sebastian already came up with a configuration for clang format which works well for RTEMS except for the fact that some configurations haven't been implemented into clang-format yet. Using AlignConsecutiveDeclarations: false Point

Re: [GSoC 2021] Beagle BSP USB OTG Support

Hello Ahamed, I'm using a J-Link to debug Beagle. I think that it doesn't have a EMU pin either. Only difference: It has an additional TRST. I would suggest to just try it. I think on OpenOCD there are a few options regarding RST. You can have SRST only, TRST only, both connected together an

Re: GSoC Project - Beagle BSP Projects

Hi, Sorry for not providing detailed explanations and for the late response. On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 5:31 PM Christian Mauderer wrote: > Hello Husni, > > On 01/05/2021 23:38, Ahamed Husni wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > My project proposal > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CN3ri7g6NJeFPb5h8y4

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 12:47 PM Christian Mauderer wrote: > Hello Ida and Gedare, > > On 06/05/2021 06:26, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > hi Ida, > > > > On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 3:21 PM Ida Delphine wrote: > >> > >> Hello everyone, > >> > >> Regarding this project (https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3860) I

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

Hello Ida and Gedare, On 06/05/2021 06:26, Gedare Bloom wrote: hi Ida, On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 3:21 PM Ida Delphine wrote: Hello everyone, Regarding this project (https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3860) I went with clang-format as we all agreed. I have tested it on some "score" files and it ma

Re: GSoC - Code Formatting and Style Checking for RTEMS score

hi Ida, On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 3:21 PM Ida Delphine wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Regarding this project (https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3860) I went with > clang-format as we all agreed. I have tested it on some "score" files and it > made some changes which I don't think are very much in lin

Re: GSoC Project - Beagle BSP Projects

Hello Husni, On 01/05/2021 23:38, Ahamed Husni wrote: Hi all, My project proposal https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CN3ri7g6NJeFPb5h8y4smr1aziGWyXbiiXUsFMhdUu4/edit?usp=sharing I tried to set

Re: GSoC Project - Beagle BSP Projects

Hi all, My project proposal https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CN3ri7g6NJeFPb5h8y4smr1aziGWyXbiiXUsFMhdUu4/edit?usp=sharing I tried to set up the JTAG Environment for the Beaglebone Black. But I couldn't find the hardware anywhere in my country (Sri Lanka). I tried to, 1. Find TI XDS Debugg

Re: GSoC 2021 Student Applications Open and Deadline

Hi Joel and students, On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 7:46 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to > > About 15 hours until the deadline per that countdown. > The deadline is +12 hours from that. But still, there is no reason to delay submitting a "final" PDF since the "final

Re: GSoC 2021 Student Applications Open and Deadline

https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to About 15 hours until the deadline per that countdown. Tick.. tick.. Please fill out the application and submit your proposal as is. Hopefully the mentors will be providing more feedback over the next few hours. You can replace the PDF of the proposal unti

Re: GSOC project: #4272 BSP Executable Conversion

Hello everyone , I am working on project "BSP Executable Conversion" (https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4272) where I have to make BSP specific script for conversion of executables from RTEMS executable format to the BSP boot loader format so that it can be run on target. I know that the previous vers

Re: GSoC Project - Beagle BSP Projects

Hi all, I have prepared a draft proposal . Added the proposal link to RTEMS Wiki. Husni Faiz - https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2021 Please have a look and let me know your thoughts. The project desc

Re: GSOC project: #4272 BSP Executable Conversion

Sir I have made a draft for the project https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4272 after some discussion about it on discord and mail-list . I would be highly grateful to get some comments and reviews about it in improving the draft (for example the part related to adding support of newly created scripts

Re: GSOC project: #4272 BSP Executable Conversion

On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 6:22 AM Ayushman Mishra wrote: > I checked all the BSPs having bsp-post-link in their config file (find > . -name *.cfg | xargs -e grep define | grep bsp-post-link) but > couldn't find similarity between them (other than "$(OBJCOPY) -O > binary --strip-all \ $(basename $@)$

Re: GSOC project: #4272 BSP Executable Conversion

On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 5:22 AM Ayushman Mishra wrote: > > I checked all the BSPs having bsp-post-link in their config file (find > . -name *.cfg | xargs -e grep define | grep bsp-post-link) but > couldn't find similarity between them (other than "$(OBJCOPY) -O > binary --strip-all \ $(basename $@)

Re: GSOC project: #4272 BSP Executable Conversion

I checked all the BSPs having bsp-post-link in their config file (find . -name *.cfg | xargs -e grep define | grep bsp-post-link) but couldn't find similarity between them (other than "$(OBJCOPY) -O binary --strip-all \ $(basename $@)$(EXEEXT) $(basename $@)$(BINEXT) " in most of them . Sir I wante

Re: GSoC'21 Raspberry Pi BSP project

Hi, I can try to give you some background, hopefully others will correct me if I don't get everything right. You are correct that the BSP just covers the original Pi1 and Pi Zero (not Pi Zero W) models + the Pi 2. I don't think the I2C and GPIO interfaces were ported to the Pi2. At some point, I t

Re: GSoC 2021 Student Applications Open and Deadline

On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 11:26 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 12:13 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> As I recall, students can submit their 'final' PDF proposals multiple >> times, so unless a student is not certain about submitting a proposal >> to RTEMS, they should feel free

Re: GSoC 2021 Student Applications Open and Deadline

On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 12:13 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > As I recall, students can submit their 'final' PDF proposals multiple > times, so unless a student is not certain about submitting a proposal > to RTEMS, they should feel free to submit their drafts as final once > they have the bulk of it don

Re: GSoC 2021 Student Applications Open and Deadline

As I recall, students can submit their 'final' PDF proposals multiple times, so unless a student is not certain about submitting a proposal to RTEMS, they should feel free to submit their drafts as final once they have the bulk of it done. Probably should confirm that however. Gedare On Mon, Apr

Re: GSoC Project- BSP Executable Conversion

On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 1:29 PM Daman Bir Singh wrote: > > Thanks for the update. > > If It's not too late, another project I would like to suggest is 4213, > libbsd: Reduce footprint of minimal buildset. Please tell me if I can go > ahead with this project. > Yes, #4213 would be suitable for pro

Re: GSOC project: #4272 BSP Executable Conversion

Boot-loader is used to initialize the hardware device , but is there any way to simulate the boot-loader without hardware?. And I suppose the command "rtems-boot-image" performs somewhat similar function to one of the objective of this project "This project is about capturing the commands and logic

Re: GSoC 2021 - Raspberry Pi projects

In addition to the previous mail, i've completed the basic Hello task. If a mentor who has previously worked on the raspberry pi bsp could let me know if the ticket is obsolete or not, I can immediately get started with the required work on it. On Fri, 2 Apr 2021, 14:35 Pranav Dangi, wrote: > Hi

Re: GSoC Project- BSP Executable Conversion

Thanks for the update. If It's not too late, another project I would like to suggest is 4213 , libbsd: Reduce footprint of minimal buildset. Please tell me if I can go ahead with this project. Thanks & Regards, Daman On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 9:48 PM Gedare Blo

Re: GSoC Project - Beagle BSP Projects

On 02/04/2021 08:36, Ahamed Husni wrote: >     Yes, this seems like an area that can be chipped away at, with a >     strong plan of activities. My concern would be whether it is about >     writing code or not? > > > After completing the above

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >