On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 12:47 PM Christian Mauderer <o...@c-mauderer.de> wrote:
> Hello Ida and Gedare, > > On 06/05/2021 06:26, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > hi Ida, > > > > On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 3:21 PM Ida Delphine <idad...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hello everyone, > >> > >> Regarding this project (https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3860) I went > with clang-format as we all agreed. I have tested it on some "score" files > and it made some changes which I don't think are very much in line with the > RTEMS coding style. However, it wasn't really clear if we will chage the > RTEMS coding style or try to make changes to clang-format to fit the style. > >> Please will love to know the best option. > >> > > We will likely need to consider our choices carefully. If we can find > > a suitably close style that is already well-supported by clang, and > > get consensus from the maintainers on a change, then that might be the > > best route forward. > > +1 > > > I think the first thing to do is take the examples > > that have been shown by Sebastian that are "close" but not quite > > perfect, and identify the cases where they differ with RTEMS style in > > order to present for discussion here. If consensus can't be reached to > > change the style, then we would need to have a plan for how to improve > > the existing tools for what we have. > > I also found the following tool quite useful to play with the clang > style config: > > https://zed0.co.uk/clang-format-configurator/ > > Maybe it can help a bit to find out what certain options mean. > > > > > However, I think there is interest in doing less work on the tool > > side, and more work on how to integrate it into our workflows better. > > +1 > I agree with all of this from the student perspective. But we will have to come to some agreement on a machine producible format to be able to use the integration. A report on what doesn't match would give us something to chew on while Ida works the integration. --joel > > > > >> Cheers, > >> Ida. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> devel mailing list > >> devel@rtems.org > >> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list > > devel@rtems.org > > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
