>
>
> > My very quick review shows that this may all be present and then it is a
> matter
> > of test cases and the compliance document. And that's a good result.
> Sometimes
> > people do work and don't update tickets.
> >
> My hazy recollection is that someone looked into this. Maybe in prior
> P
I have submitted the draft proposal and proof of enrollment
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 4:20 PM Eshan Dhawan
wrote:
> Will do it ASAP..
>
> Thanks for the heads up
> > On 21-Mar-2020, at 3:55 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> >
> > Hello Aspiring Students,
> >
> > I wanted to let you know that you can sub
I have incorporated the valuable suggestions of Dr Bloom in my proposal.
Looking forward for any further suggestions.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OerM8Iix7PbDUCyb_J_KEzcMgLbvdqxd4FnK_BqI7XI/edit
Thank you
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 3:17 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 2:57 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote:
>>
>> hello,
>>
>> I didn't quite understand the ticket
>> If I could get some more detail on it.
>
>
> Newlib has a search dirtectory:
>
> https://github.com/RTEMS/sourceware-mirror-n
Hi Eshan,
It can be tricky to apply a patch from an email. I used to have a
script to help for gmail, but it doesn't work anymore with Google's
"Insecure Apps" filtering. What you can do is, if you have the email
in your inbox, you can go to "Show Original" and then copy/paste the
content to a tex
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 4:05 PM Aditya Upadhyay wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 1:56 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020, 3:16 PM Aditya Upadhyay
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 1:30 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 a
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 2:57 PM Eshan Dhawan
wrote:
> hello,
>
> I didn't quite understand the ticket
> If I could get some more detail on it.
>
Newlib has a search dirtectory:
https://github.com/RTEMS/sourceware-mirror-newlib-cygwin/tree/master/newlib/libc/search
Is all the code that could ru
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 1:56 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020, 3:16 PM Aditya Upadhyay wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 1:30 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 3:03 AM Aditya Upadhyay
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, 21 Mar 20
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020, 3:16 PM Aditya Upadhyay wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 1:30 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 3:03 AM Aditya Upadhyay
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, 21 Mar 2020, 10:29 Eshan Dhawan,
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I went through the FreeBSD and
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 1:30 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 3:03 AM Aditya Upadhyay wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 21 Mar 2020, 10:29 Eshan Dhawan, wrote:
>>>
>>> I went through the FreeBSD and NetBSD sources for implementation
>>> In FreeBSD there is an architecture-specifi
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 1:30 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 3:03 AM Aditya Upadhyay
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 21 Mar 2020, 10:29 Eshan Dhawan, wrote:
>>
>>> I went through the FreeBSD and NetBSD sources for implementation
>>> In FreeBSD there is an architecture-specific
Thanks
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 1:31 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 2:53 PM Eshan Dhawan
> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone
>> I tried to apply this patch but it fails.
>> Since I have done this before so I might be doing something wrong.
>> if you all could guide me
>>
>> patch
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 2:53 PM Eshan Dhawan
wrote:
> Hello everyone
> I tried to apply this patch but it fails.
> Since I have done this before so I might be doing something wrong.
> if you all could guide me
>
> patch : https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-March/058516.html
>
Should be
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 3:03 AM Aditya Upadhyay wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2020, 10:29 Eshan Dhawan, wrote:
>
>> I went through the FreeBSD and NetBSD sources for implementation
>> In FreeBSD there is an architecture-specific implementation with
>> different header file for each architecture it
hello,
I didn't quite understand the ticket
If I could get some more detail on it.
thanks
-Eshan
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello everyone
I tried to apply this patch but it fails.
Since I have done this before so I might be doing something wrong.
if you all could guide me
patch : https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-March/058516.html
thanks
eshan
___
devel mailing l
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 12:19 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:14 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 7:56 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I think something is wrong with the build of spike that ends up with
>>> a hard-coded path to ins
PS: This is getting better incrementally, you're doing a good job
getting through your first real patch :) It can be a real challenge
sometimes especially since there are a lot of nit-picky things to
learn with the coding style issues.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 12:51 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> I li
I liked it better before, when the test prints nothing if it is
successful. I think this is the trend we are heading toward in rtems
tests.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 11:46 AM Eshan Dhawan wrote:
>
> I ran the code using qemu for risc-v architecture.
> The value of r = 0 for the function to run with
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:14 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 7:56 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I think something is wrong with the build of spike that ends up with
>> a hard-coded path to inside a build tree:
>>
>> Result: invalidTime: 0:00:01.197748 mimfs_fsli
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 10:38 AM Niteesh G. S. wrote:
> Which architecture should I try then? Maybe powerpc or mips? If you have
> any
> of them already built can you please try them out? Building everything from
> source takes a lot of time in my dev machine.
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:41 PM
Thanks for the feedback, I will do this as soon as possible.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 9:33 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020, 6:14 AM Utkarsh Rai wrote:
>
>> I am interested in updating the user's guide as described in
>> https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3912. When I had built RTE
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020, 8:47 AM Eshan Dhawan wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
> I went through the POSIX Compliance guide and it showed that
> wcsncasecmp_l () was not supported in wchar.h
> But when I checked newlib it had been implemented in libc/string
> so I think it needs to be updated in the docs.
>
I ran the code using qemu for risc-v architecture.
The value of r = 0 for the function to run without error
while the error is raised when the value is not matched with the correct
value defined in
rtems_test_assert().
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.o
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 11:04 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 10:48 PM Aditya Upadhyay wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 9:32 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote:
>> >
>> > I have added the changes as told by Aditya
>> > I would like to know is any other changes are required to be ma
Hello,
I know you might be consumed in some work, But can you please clarify a few
things or some other developer from the community. Please explain a bit
about "The entire API will need to be tested using pytest" and your
feedback on
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_G0-q7J2b-5kJzZGI32a-KpC6gMz
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 10:48 PM Aditya Upadhyay
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 9:32 PM Eshan Dhawan
> wrote:
> >
> > I have added the changes as told by Aditya
> > I would like to know is any other changes are required to be made to
> make the patch usable
> >
> > Thanks
> > Eshan
> > > On 21
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 9:32 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote:
>
> I have added the changes as told by Aditya
> I would like to know is any other changes are required to be made to make the
> patch usable
>
> Thanks
> Eshan
> > On 21-Mar-2020, at 8:20 PM, Eshan dhawan wrote:
> >
> > ---
> > testsuites/psx
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020, 6:14 AM Utkarsh Rai wrote:
> I am interested in updating the user's guide as described in
> https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3912. When I had built RTEMS for the first
> time this was one of the questions I faced, so I guess adding this would be
> useful for new users.
> I thi
I have added the changes as told by Aditya
I would like to know is any other changes are required to be made to make the
patch usable
Thanks
Eshan
> On 21-Mar-2020, at 8:20 PM, Eshan dhawan wrote:
>
> ---
> testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c | 89 ++--
> 1 file cha
Which architecture should I try then? Maybe powerpc or mips? If you have any
of them already built can you please try them out? Building everything from
source takes a lot of time in my dev machine.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:41 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 12:54 AM Niteesh G.
---
testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c | 89 ++--
1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c
b/testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c
index cdb0fa596e..0ea820c523 100644
--- a/testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c
++
Hello everyone
I went through the POSIX Compliance guide and it showed that wcsncasecmp_l
() was not supported in wchar.h
But when I checked newlib it had been implemented in libc/string
so I think it needs to be updated in the docs.
Thanks
Eshan
___
d
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 12:54 AM Niteesh G. S. wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 11:43 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 11:56 AM Niteesh G. S. wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > While looking for small tasks to take up, Gedare mentioned about adding
>> > GDB BSPs
>> > to rte
I am interested in updating the user's guide as described in
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3912. When I had built RTEMS for the first
time this was one of the questions I faced, so I guess adding this would be
useful for new users.
I think we could place the differences under quick-start section 2
Will do it ASAP..
Thanks for the heads up
> On 21-Mar-2020, at 3:55 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> Hello Aspiring Students,
>
> I wanted to let you know that you can submit and revise your
> application including your "Final" proposal as many times as you like
> in the Official website, and tha
Will do it! Thank you
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 11:51 AM Denil Verghese wrote:
> Will do!
>
> On Sat, 21 Mar, 2020, 4:03 AM Gedare Bloom, wrote:
>
>> PS: And gather your proof documentation to submit :)
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 4:24 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello Aspiring Students,
Thanks for the heads up, Surely complete it asap.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 11:51 AM Denil Verghese wrote:
> Will do!
>
> On Sat, 21 Mar, 2020, 4:03 AM Gedare Bloom, wrote:
>
>> PS: And gather your proof documentation to submit :)
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 4:24 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> >
>>
On Sat, 21 Mar 2020, 10:29 Eshan Dhawan, wrote:
> I went through the FreeBSD and NetBSD sources for implementation
> In FreeBSD there is an architecture-specific implementation with different
> header file for each architecture it supports .
> Whereas in NetBSD there is a single fenv.h defined bu
39 matches
Mail list logo
