On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 3:17 PM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 2:57 PM Eshan Dhawan <eshandhawa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> hello, >> >> I didn't quite understand the ticket >> If I could get some more detail on it. > > > Newlib has a search dirtectory: > > https://github.com/RTEMS/sourceware-mirror-newlib-cygwin/tree/master/newlib/libc/search > > Is all the code that could run on RTEMS enabled? Check which methods in there > are built currently and which are not. > > https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/ is the top of the current > version > of the POSIX standard. Search for search.h and check the list off with what > newlib > has and what's enabled when building for RTEMS. You can check build logs for > the > tools or do something like CPU-rtems5-nm ...../libc.a and look for the symbol > to be > present and have a non-zero length. > > Then we address what methods are missing. And what need tests inside the > RTEMS test suite. > > My very quick review shows that this may all be present and then it is a > matter > of test cases and the compliance document. And that's a good result. Sometimes > people do work and don't update tickets. > My hazy recollection is that someone looked into this. Maybe in prior POSIX Compliance projects?
> --joel >> >> >> thanks >> -Eshan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> devel@rtems.org >> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
