PS: This is getting better incrementally, you're doing a good job getting through your first real patch :) It can be a real challenge sometimes especially since there are a lot of nit-picky things to learn with the coding style issues.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 12:51 PM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > > I liked it better before, when the test prints nothing if it is > successful. I think this is the trend we are heading toward in rtems > tests. > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 11:46 AM Eshan Dhawan <eshandhawa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I ran the code using qemu for risc-v architecture. > > The value of r = 0 for the function to run without error > > while the error is raised when the value is not matched with the correct > > value defined in > > rtems_test_assert(). > > > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list > > devel@rtems.org > > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
